Cases

Irwin Industrial Tool Company v. Christine Pifer, et al., No. 49, September Term, 2021 AUTHENTICATION THROUGH CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE UNDER MARYLAND RULE 5-901(b)(4) – “REASONABLE JUROR” TEST – ALTERNATIVE GROUNDS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT – Court of Appeals held that items purchased on eBay that purportedly contained defendant’s product contaminated with asbestos were authenticated as exemplars of product, as there was sufficient circumstantial evidence for reasonable juror to find by preponderance

Irwin Industrial Tool Company v. Christine Pifer, et al., No. 49, September Term, 2021 AUTHENTICATION THROUGH CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE UNDER MARYLAND RULE 5-901(b)(4) – “REASONABLE JUROR” TEST – ALTERNATIVE GROUNDS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT – Court of Appeals held that items purchased on eBay that purportedly contained defendant’s product contaminated with asbestos were authenticated as exemplars of product, as there was sufficient circumstantial evidence for reasonable juror to find by preponderance

974 A.2d 376 (2009) 186 Md. App. 372 WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK v. Susie M. HOMAN et al. No. 1586, September Term, 2008. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. June 12, 2009. *379 Robert A. Scott (Lisa M. Welsh, Ballard Spahr Andrews & Ingersoll, LLP on the brief), Baltimore, for appellant. E. Andrew

STRINE, Chief Justice: I. INTRODUCTION Jose Campos was injured while working for Daisy Construction Company (“Daisy”). While Campos was receiving total disability payments from Daisy, Daisy performed an investigation of his social security number at the request of its workers’ *572 </

Siddoway, J. ¶1 This interlocutory appeal calls upon us to address a corporation’s responsibility for responding to discovery when members of its board of directors refuse to provide relevant information because of concern for their individual exposure to criminal prosecution. The trial court correctly recognized that while the board members had the right, individually, to invoke their privilege against self-incrimination when de

WOLFSON, United States District Judge: Plaintiffs ASAH, Spectrum360, Verona, Spectrum360, Livingston, Michele Homa, the HollyDELL School, Hurffville ("HollyDELL"), and Maureen Grossi (collectively, "Plaintiffs") bring this case against Defendants the New Jersey Department of Education (the "Department" or "DOE"), Kimberly Harrington, in her official capacity as the Department's Commissioner of Education, Kevin Dahmer, in his officia

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER AMY J. ST. EVE, District Court Judge: In this consolidated, multi-district litigation (“MDL”), Plaintiffs1 are purchasers and users of a paint product called “Deck *778& Concrete Restore” or “Restore 10X” (collectively “Restore”), manufactured by Defendant Rust-Oleum Corporation (“Rust-O