⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “COKER v. AUSTIN”

Coker v. Thalerpublic domain
District Court, N.D. Texas · 2009-11-16 · Published · cited 0× · 670 F. Supp. 2d 541; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 107101; 2009 WL 3849647
670 F.Supp.2d 541 (2009) Thomas Lane COKER, Petitioner, v. Rick THALER, Director, Respondent. Civil Action No. 3:03-CV-2146-N. United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division. November 16, 2009. *545 Thomas Lane Coker, Rosharon, TX, pro se. Jason D. Hawkins, Federal Public Defender, Dallas, TX, for Petitioner.
Grigsby v. Cokerpublic domain
Texas Supreme Court · 1995-09-14 · Published · cited 18× · 904 S.W.2d 619; 1995 WL 277026
904 S.W.2d 619 (1995) Cyndee GRIGSBY and Robert R. Wightman, Relators, v. The Honorable B.F. COKER, Judge, Respondent. No. 95-0057. Supreme Court of Texas. May 11, 1995. Rehearing Overruled September 14, 1995. Robert R. Wightman, Dallas, for relators. R. Clayton Hutchins, Grand Prairie, Christopher Johnsen, Austin, for respondent.
Coker v. McMillanpublic domain
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019-11-06 · Published · cited 0× · 2019 NY Slip Op 7948
Coker v McMillan (2019 NY Slip Op 07948) Coker v McMillan 2019 NY Slip Op 07948 Decided on November 6, 2019 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary La
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas) · 2019-07-29 · Published · cited 0×
AFFIRM; and Opinion Filed July 29, 2019 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-17-00782-CR MUSTAPHA RAHMAN COKER, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 194th Judicial District Court
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2003-12-19 · Published · cited 14× · 2004 OK CIV APP 49; 91 P.3d 81; 75 O.B.A.J. 1641; 2004 Okla. Civ. App. LEXIS 28; 2004 WL 1193956
91 P.3d 81 (2004) 2004 OK CIV APP 49 ROADS WEST, INC., Petitioner, v. Neal AUSTIN; TTC Illinois, Inc.; Regency Insurance Company; CNA Insurance Companies; and The Workers' Compensation Court, Respondents. No. 99,568. Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma, Division No. 1. December 19, 2003. Rehearing Denied March 12, 2004. C
District Court, N.D. Mississippi · 2002-11-25 · Published · cited 9× · 232 F. Supp. 2d 682; 2002 WL 31649986
232 F.Supp.2d 682 (2002) Elizabeth Crowder AUSTIN, individually and as administratrix of the Estate of Andrew C. Austin, deceased, Heidi Elizabeth Austin, and Frank Barksdale Austin Plaintiffs v. WILL-BURT COMPANY and QUICK SET INTERNATIONAL, INC. Defendants No. 4:00CV187-M-B. United States District Court, N.D. Mississippi, Greenville Division. November 25, 2002.
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2026-03-12 · Published · cited 0×
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-25-00627-CV Lester Ayensu-Coker, Appellant v. PRB Equity 21A, LLC d/b/a Dryfield Studios, Appellee FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF TRAVIS COUNTY NO. C-1-CV-25-002895, THE HONORABLE DON R. BURGESS, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OPINION
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2022-03-11 · Published · cited 0×
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-20-00571-CV AMLI Downtown Austin, L.P., Appellant v. Peli Peli Austin, LLC, Appellee FROM THE 353RD DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY NO. D-1-GN-18-002700, THE HONORABLE TIM SULAK, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OPINION Pel
Coleman v. Cokerpublic domain
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009-10-20 · Published · cited 3× · 66 A.D.3d 812; 888 N.Y.S.2d 535
In an action, inter alia, to impose a constructive trust on certain real property and for specific performance of a contract for the sale of that real property, the plaintiffs appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Saitta, J.), dated February 8, 2008, as granted that branch of the defendants’ motion which was to vacate a notice of pendency filed in connection with the property and granted the defendants’ application for permis
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas) · 2013-07-17 · Published · cited 0×
REVERSE and REMAND; and Opinion Filed July 17, 2013. S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-12-00616-CR No. 05-12-00617-CR THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellant V. JEFFREY BRIAN
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas) · 2013-07-17 · Published · cited 3× · 406 S.W.3d 392; 2013 WL 3728819; 2013 Tex. App. LEXIS 8835
OPINION Opinion by Justice BRIDGES. The State of Texas appeals the trial courts orders granting Jeffrey Brian Cok-ers motions to suppress. In a single issue, the State argues the trial court erred in granting Cokers motions to suppress. We reverse the trial courts orders granting Cokers motions to suppress and remand for further proce
Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler) · 2010-12-08 · Published · cited 0×
NO. 12-09-00331-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS BOBBY EUGENE COKER, ' APPEAL FROM THE 2ND APPELLANT V. ' JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE ' CHEROKEE COUNTY, TEXAS
Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler) · 2010-12-08 · Published · cited 0×
NO NO. 12-09-00331-CR
Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo) · 2014-02-27 · Published · cited 0×
In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo No. 07-13-00287-CV CITY OF FRITCH, APPELLANT V. KIRK COKER, APPELLEE On Appeal from the 84th District Court Hutchinson County, Tex
District Court, N.D. Texas · 2016-04-25 · Published · cited 0× · 182 F. Supp. 3d 633; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 54625; 2016 WL 1625763
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JANE J. BOYLE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Before the Court are Defendant Kroger Texas L.P.’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 96) and Plaintiff Randy J. Austin’s Motion to Reconsider Order Denying Plaintiffs Motion for Leave to File Surre-ply (Doc. 113). For the reasons that follow, the Court GRANTS the Motion for Summary Judgment and DENIES the Motion to Reconsider.
Austin v. Austinpublic domain
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000-04-07 · Published · cited 27× · 2000 ME 61; 748 A.2d 996; 2000 Me. LEXIS 61
748 A.2d 996 (2000) 2000 ME 61 Stephen B. AUSTIN v. Valerie A. AUSTIN. Supreme Judicial Court of Maine. Submitted on Briefs February 25, 2000. Decided April 7, 2000. *997 Robert A. Laskoff, Laskoff & Associates, Lewiston, for plaintiff. Coleman G. Coyne Jr., Murphy and Coyne, Lewiston, for defen
Texas Supreme Court · 2024-06-28 · Published · cited 0×
Supreme Court of Texas ══════════ No. 22-1149 ══════════ Roger Borgelt, Mark Pulliam, Jay Wiley, and the State of Texas, Petitioners, v. Austin Firefighters Association, IAFF Local 975; City of Austin; and Marc A. Ott, in His Official Capacity as the City Manager of the City of Austin,
Austin v. Statepublic domain
Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2007-06-06 · Published · cited 11× · 648 S.E.2d 414; 286 Ga. App. 149; 2007 Fulton County D. Rep. 1854; 2007 Ga. App. LEXIS 630
648 S.E.2d 414 (2007) AUSTIN v. The STATE. No. A07A0507. Court of Appeals of Georgia. June 6, 2007. Reconsideration denied June 26, 2007. *415 Shon Robert Austin, pro se. *416 Kelly R. Burke, Dist. Atty., Jason Edward Ashford, Timothy Michael Marlow, Asst. Dist. Attys.,
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2014-02-20 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs October 15, 2013 at Knoxville STATE OF TENNESSEE v. CORY AUSTIN EDISON Appeal from the Criminal Court for Davidson County No. 2011-B-1708 Seth Norman, Judge No. M2012-02205-CCA-R3-CD - Filed February 20, 2014 The Defendant, Cory Austin Edison, challenges his jury conviction for aggravated robber
Coker v. Burghardtpublic domain
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas) · 1992-06-25 · Published · cited 19× · 833 S.W.2d 306; 1992 Tex. App. LEXIS 2115; 1992 WL 192294
Case Number: 05-91-01310-CV 12/10/1992 Record returned to Court of Appeals 12/09/1992 Motion for Rehearing - Disposed Overruled 11/30/1992 Conditional motion for rehearing No description available. 11/30/1992 Motion for Rehearing - Filed 11/30/1992 Motion for Rehearing forwarded 11/18/1992 Application for Writ of Error - Disposed proceeding denied 10/08/1992 Case forwarded to Court 10/06/1992 Reply filed 09/21/1992 Application for Writ of Error - Filed [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADN