Cases

McKAY, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff Glen Llewellyn filed this action asserting a Fair Debt Collection Practices Act claim, a Fair Credit Reporting Act claim, and a state law outrageous conduct claim against Ocwen Loan Servicing LLC and Nomura Credit and Capital, Inc. (together, the “Ocwen Defendants”) based on *1

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER LEE H. ROSENTHAL, District Judge. The bankruptcy debtor, Charles Cowin, a real-estate developer, appeals from the findings and conclusions the bankruptcy court issued after a six-day adversary proceeding. The plaintiffs in that proceeding, Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. (“Countrywide”), Deutsche Bank National Trust Company (“Deutsche Bank”), Chase Home Finance, LLC (“Chase”), We

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Tom S. Lee, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE On January 29, 2016, plaintiff All American Check Cashing (All American) filed a complaint' in this cause seeking money damages and injunctive relief prohibiting the Mississippi Department of Banking and Consumer Finance (DBCF or the Department) from revoking its licenses to do business in the state and from seizing assets o'f All Ameri

MEMORANDUM JOAN N. FEENEY, Bankruptcy Judge. I. INTRODUCTION The matter before the Court is the Chapter 7 Trustee’s “Motion for Summary Judgment as to All Counts of Her Second Amended Complaint,” which contains six counts as follows: Count I against Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., for unjust enrichment in the amount of $397,361.11, plus prejudgment interest at th

593 F.3d 660 (2010) MIDWEST TITLE LOANS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David H. MILLS, Director of the Indiana Department of Financial Institutions, Defendant-Appellant. No. 09-2083. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued November 10, 2009. Decided January 28, 2010. *661 Stanley C. Fickle (argued)

MEMORANDUM OPINION ON NON-DISCHARGEABILITY OF DEBTS PURSUANT TO §§ 523(a)(4) and 523(a)(6) [relates to Adv. No. 10-03583, Doc. No. 41; Adv. No. 10-03584, Doc. No. 51; Adv. No. 10-03585, Doc. No. 58] JEFF BOHM, Chief Judge. I. Introduction These adversary proceedings, which were tried simultaneously, concern the existence of certain debts pursuant to Texas state law,

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit No. 09-2083 M IDWEST T ITLE L OANS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. D AVID H. M ILLS, Director of the Indiana Department of Financial Institutions, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern

432 B.R. 671 (2010) In re Ydalia RODRIGUEZ, Debtor(s). Ydalia Rodriguez, et al, Plaintiff(s) v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., Defendant(s). Bankruptcy No. 02-10605. Adversary No. 08-01004. United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas, Brownsville Division. July 21, 2010. *677 Ellen C. Stone, The Stone Law Firm PC, McAllen, TX,

[Cite as Phillips v. Phillips, 2014-Ohio-5439.] COURT OF APPEALS STARK COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT RENEE PHILLIPS NKA BLASHAK : JUDGES: : : Hon. William B. Hoffman, P.J. Plaintiff-Appellee : Hon. Sheila G. Farmer, J.

396 B.R. 485 (2008) In re Janice B. MEADOWS, Debtor. Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. d/b/a CheckSmart, Appellant, v. Janice B. Meadows, Appellee. Nos. 08-8005 and 08-8024. United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit. Argued August 12, 2008. Decided and Filed November 12, 2008. *488 ARGUED: Danie

PRESENT: All the Justices ANDREA GAIL JONES OPINION BY v. Record No. 190643 JUSTICE D. ARTHUR KELSEY DECEMBER 3, 2020 TERRY M. PHILLIPS, ET AL. FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF POWHATAN COUNTY Paul W. Cella, Judge In this appeal, we address two questions of first impressio

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DISMISSING ADVERSARY PROCEEDING David M. Warren, United States Bankruptcy Judge The matter before the court is the viability of Sherrill Mclnnis’ Complaint/Motion in Adversary Proceeding and Objection to Discharge (“Complaint”) filed by Sherrill S. Mclnnis (“Mclnnis”) on August 4, 2014 against Bradley Morton Phillips (“B. Phillips”) and Susanna G. Phillips (collectively “Phill

296 S.W.3d 656 (2009) Claire Stanard PHILLIPS, Appellant, v. Troy D. PHILLIPS, Appellee. No. 08-06-00171-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, El Paso. March 26, 2009. Rehearing Overruled May 28, 2009. *662 Claire Stanard Phillips, Dallas, pro se. David R. Weiner, Glast Phillips & Murray PC, Dallas, for appel

Weiss v Phillips (2017 NY Slip Op 08209) Weiss v Phillips 2017 NY Slip Op 08209 Decided on November 21, 2017 Appellate Division, First Department Renwick, J. Published by New York S

Weiss v Phillips (2017 NY Slip Op 08209) Weiss v Phillips 2017 NY Slip Op 08209 Decided on November 21, 2017 Appellate Division, First Department Renwick, J. Published by New York S

(2008) Daniel FRITZ, Plaintiff, v. PHILLIPS SERVICE INDUSTRIES, INC. a Michigan corporation, Defendant. Civil Case No. 06-11149. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division. May 12, 2008. ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION PAUL V. GADOLA, District Judge. Before this Court are the parties' cross-mo

ORDER CLAY D. LAND, District Judge. Defendant BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP (“BAC”) admits that it made a mistake which it eventually corrected. For its confession and atonement, it seeks absolution. Plaintiffs Todd and Samantha Blackburn (“Blackburns”), having allegedly “gone through hell” for what they argue was more than just a simple mistake, are in no mood for mercy. They seek compensati

LIPEZ, Circuit Judge. This case raises important questions about the application of the Visual Artists Rights Act of 1990 (‘VARA”), 17 U.S.C. § 106A, to “site-specific art”, which is a subset of “integrated art”. A work of “integrated art” is comprised of two or more physical objects that must be presented together as the artist intended for the work to retain its meaning and in

Vacated and remanded by published opinion. Senior Judge HAMILTON wrote the opinion, in which Judge NIEMEYER and Judge JACKSON joined. OPINION HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. In this interlocutory appeal, Elite Financial Services, Inc. (Elite) challenges the district court’s denial of its motion to compel arbitration of, and stay proceedings with respect to, various federal and Maryland

WEAVER, J. (concurring in part and dissenting in part). I concur in the majority’s conclusion that MCL 257.401(3), which caps the amount of a lessor’s liability in motor vehicle leases of thirty days or less, does not violate plaintiffs constitutional rights to a jury trial,1 *439equal