Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
7 opinions for “CLAWSON v. SUPERINTENDENT, EASTERN CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTE”
Doe v. Smallpublic domain
934 F.2d 743 59 USLW 2752 Jane DOE, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.George D. SMALL, Mayor of the City of Ottawa, Illinois;Barbara J. Lindquist, William C. Ferguson, Alan R. Howarterand William N. Stevenson, Members of the City Council of theCity of Ottawa, Illinois; and the City of Ottawa, Illinois,a municipal corporation, Defendants,1The Ottawa Jaycees, Intervenor-Defendant-Appellant.
ACCEPTED 04-15-00469-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 9/3
HOLLINGSWORTH, Judge. This is an original proceeding in the nature of quo warranto brought by the Attorney General at the relation of allegedly Reorganized School District R-I of Miller County, its alleged directors, and an individual resident taxpayer of said district, hereinafter referred to as Relators, against the persons allegedly elected directors of allegedly Reorganized School District R-III of Morgan County. Both of
T. J. Stevenson & Co. v. 81,193 Bags of Flourpublic domain
JOHN R. BROWN, Circuit Judge: With this decision we hopefully end, in all but a minor respect, an amphibious imbroglio 1 and commercial law practitioner’s nightmare involving three shiploads of enriched wheat flour.2 By a coincidence in this confusing case, each shipload of flour became infested, to varying degrees, with confused (triboleum confusam) and red
629 F.2d 338 30 UCC Rep.Serv. 865, 7 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 1336 T. J. STEVENSON & CO., INC., a corporation, Plaintiff andCounterclaimant, Appellee-Cross-Appellant,v.81,193 BAGS OF FLOUR, etc., Defendant.ADM MILLING CO., INC., Defendant, Counterclaimant & ThirdParty Plaintiff- Appellant, Cross-Appellee,v.T. J. STEVENSON & CO., INC., MV NEDON, etc., Defendants asto Counterclaim,
11 F.Supp. 976 (1935) RECONSTRUCTION FINANCE CORPORATION v. CENTRAL REPUBLIC TRUST CO. No. 14189. District Court, N. D. Illinois, Eastern Division. August 13, 1935. *977 *978 John L. Hopkins, O. John Rogge, James A. Sprowl, Floyd M. Rett, and George E. McMurray, all of Chicago, Ill., and James
United States v. Colepublic domain
OPINION OF THE COURT. Before the-jury were called, a motion was made by the defendants' counsel to quash the iu-dictment. The main ground upon which the motion to quash was urged was. that the act under which the indictment was found, applied, exclusively to offenses committed on the high seas, and not on our rivers and lakes. It was also urged that the act was unconstitutional, if it was intended to apply to our internal commerce. These points were argu