Cases

149 P.3d 25 (2007) CITIZENS BANK, N.A. v. KANSAS BANKERS SUR. CO. No. 95136. Court of Appeals of Kansas. January 5, 2007. Decision without published opinion. Reversed.

Robb, P.J. {¶ 1} Plaintiff-Appellant Citizens Bank, N.A. appeals the decision of the Columbiana County Common Pleas Court confirming a foreclosure sale to a third-party purchaser after finding the bank had no right to redeem the property. The appeal revolves around the language in R.C. 2329.311(A), which allows the judgment creditor and first lienholder to redeem the residential proper

OPINION MILLER, Judge: ¶ 1 First Citizens Bank appeals the trial court’s ruling dismissing its breach of contract action as to the spouses of three guaranty signatories. It argues the court erred by *564applying Arizona law to the guaranties rather than California law, which led the court to dismiss the action, It also argues the court abused its d

ORDER PER CURIAM. AND NOW, this 19th day of June, 2013, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal and Application to File a Reply to the Answer are denied.

ORDER PER CURIAM. AND NOW, this 19th day of June, 2013, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal and Application to File a Reply to the Answer are denied.

Hunt, J. ¶1 Daniel L. and Jeanne Allison, guarantors of three commercial promissory notes issued by Cornerstone Homes & Development LLC, appeal the superior court’s judgment on the pleadings, ordering them to pay a deficiency following a nonjudicial trustee’s sale of Cornerstone’s properties that secured the notes with construction deeds of trust. The Allisons argue that (1) these construction deeds of trust also secured thei

[Cite as RBS Citizens, NA v. Sharp, 2015-Ohio-5438.] STATE OF OHIO, MAHONING COUNTY IN THE COURT OF APPEALS SEVENTH DISTRICT RBS CITIZENS, NA ) CASE NO. 13 MA 11 ) PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE ) ) VS.

VANASKIE, Circuit Judge. This interlocutory appeal authorized by Rule 23(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure presents us with two significant questions. First, did the District Court err in certifying a class of Citizens Bank (N.A.) Mortgage Loan Officers from ten different states who bring claims alleging that they were unlawfully denied overtime pay? And second, may we exercise

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 22-2107 ___________________________ Larry Muff, Executor of the estate of Joseph A. Muff Plaintiff - Appellant v. Wells Fargo Bank NA

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan June 12, 2015 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice 150642

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan June 12, 2015 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice 150642

OPINION HUDDLESTON, Judge. Bank One Kentucky NA, formerly known as Liberty National Bank and Trust Company of Kentucky, appeals from an order dismissing its petition for a declaration of rights under a loan agreement and mortgage between it and other banks, as obligees, and LHR-Partners, Ltd., as obligor. Jefferson Circuit Court dismissed the petition on the ground that no justiciable controversy w

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., : : Plaintiff, : Civil Action No.: 18-2381 (RC) : v. : Re Document No.: 2 : ZENOBI

[Cite as Citizens Bank, N.A. v. Leek, 2018-Ohio-3427.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COLUMBIANA COUNTY CITIZENS BANK, NA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. KIRK A. LEEK et al., Defen

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER CHRISTOPHER R. COOPER, United States District Judge Plaintiffs Gregory and-Christina Walsh purchased their Virginia home with a variable-rate mortgage in 2006. ■ When their interest charges increased beyond their ability to pay, the Walshes brought suit in the Eastern District of Virginia in 2011, asserting proce

LYNCH, Circuit Judge. This putative class action alleges that Citizens Bank's "Sustained Overdraft Fees" for overdrawn checking accounts are usurious interest charges in violation of Section 85 of the National Bank Act, 12 U.S.C. § 1 et seq. The district court concluded that Citizens Bank's fees were not "int

BOONSTRA, P.J. In this insurance dispute, plaintiff Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., appeals by right the September 4, 2012 order of the trial court granting summary *510disposition in favor of defendants Elizabeth A. Null and Auto-Owners Insurance Company under MCR 2.116(C)(10).1 Specifically, the trial court ruled that Wells Fargo, the mortgagee, was

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 26a0163p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ VIVY VOUTSIOTIS, Executor of the Estate of George │ Voutsiotis, GEOR

AMENDED ORDER G. MURRAY SNOW, District Judge. Before the Court is Plaintiffs Motion to Remand (Doc. 17) and the Motion to Dismiss filed by MTC Financial, Inc. (“Trustee Corps”) (Doc. 6.) For the following reasons, the Court denies Plaintiffs Motion to Remand and grants the Motion to Dismiss. BACKGROUND In 2006, Plaintiff, Julie M. Vawter, took out a loan from Countr

MEMORANDUM OPINION BERYL A. HOWELL, Chief Judge Plaintiff Mark Fam, who is proceeding pro se, brings this action against his loan servicers Bank of America, N.A. (“BANA”) and Green Tree Servicing LLC, now known, as Ditech Financial LLC (“Di-tech”). First Am. Compl. (“FAC”) at 1, ECF No. 18. The plaintiff asserts claims for violations of the Truth in Lending Act (“TILA”), 15 U.S.C. § 1634 et s