Cases

*75 ORDER CALDWELL, District Judge. THE BACKGROUND OF THIS ORDER IS AS FOLLOWS: The defendant, Besser Company, has filed a motion for summary judgment based on 42 Pa.C.S. § 5536, a Pennsylvania statute of repose prohibiting suits for injuries inflicted by an improvement to real property more than twelve years after constru

448 F.Supp.2d 397 (2006) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. NEW YORK CITY BOARD OF EDUCATION; City of New York; Lilliam Barrios-Paoli, Personnel Director, New York City Department of Personnel (in her official capacity); New York City Department of Personnel, Defendants, and John Brennan; James G. Ahearn; Dennis Mortenson and Scott Spring, Intervenors, and Janet. Caldero, Celia I. Calderon, Martha Chellemi, Andrew Clement, Kr

MEMORANDUM OPINION SIMANDLE, Chief Judge: On March 27, 2015, the Court granted in part Plaintiff City Select Auto Sales, Inc.’s (hereinafter, “City Select” or the “Plaintiff Class”) motion for class-wide summary judgment, and entered Judgment in favor' of the City Select Class and against Defendant David/Randall Associates, Inc. (hereinafter, “David/Randall”), in the amount of $22,405,000 for violations o

OPINION OF THE COURT (October 1, 2014) Swan, Associate Justice. Frank E. Hughley appeals the Superior Court’s orders, denying his Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, which alleges constitutional rights violations, and denying his Motion for Sentence Reduction based upon his alleged change in circumstance. We affirm the Superior Court’s order denying his Motion for Sentence Reduction,

493 F.Supp.2d 215 (2007) Diliana HERNANDEZ-PAYERO, Plaintiff, v. COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO, et al., Defendants. Civil No. 02-2470 (FAB). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. April 27, 2007. *216 *217 Carlos A. Piovanetti-Rivera, Piovanetti Law Office, Carlos A. Piovanetti-Dohnert, S

Mr. Justice Belaval, with whom Mr. Justice Hernández Matos and Mr. Justice Santana Becerra agree, dissenting. San Juan, Puerto Rico, June 14,1967 On September 24, 1963 the intervener Pedro Ángel Torres was owner of a motor vehicle, a GMC Panel Delivery, license No. C-336-371; since 1961 the vehicle had been leased by the intervener to Nicolás Ortiz to be used in the bakery business w

92 N.J. Super. 1 (1966) 222 A.2d 110 ADRIENNE ROLAND, ETC., ET AL., PLAINTIFFS, AND BERNARD SHAPIRO, AS CONNECTICUT STATE WELFARE COMMISSIONER, ADDED PARTY PLAINTIFF, v. MODELL'S SHOPPERS WORLD OF BERGEN COUNTY, INC., ET AL., DEFENDANTS AND THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF, v. N.J. WAREHOUSE DISTRIBUTORS, INC. (AND THREE OTHERS), THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANTS AND FOURTH-PARTY PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. KAYSERROTH AND JEFF RIC

427 P.2d 833 (1967) PEPSI COLA BOTTLING CO. OF ANCHORAGE, Inc., Appellant, v. SUPERIOR BURNER SERVICE CO., Inc., Appellee. No. 625. Supreme Court of Alaska. May 19, 1967. *834 Warren Matthews, Jr., and Theodore M. Pease, Jr., of Burr, Boney & Pease, Anchorage, for appellant. Daniel A. Moore, Jr., and James K. Singleton

OPINION OF THE COURT (August 1, 2017) Hodge, Chief Justice. The Superior Court, in a February 14, 2017 order, certified several issues addressed in its prior interlocutory orders for immediate appellate review pursuant to the procedure set forth in title 4, section 33(c) of the Virgin Islands Code. For the following reasons, we affirm in part and reverse in part. I.

310 F.Supp.2d 402 (2004) Margarita VIVES et. al., Plaintiff(s) v. Cesar REY, Secretary Department of Education, et. al., Defendant(s). Civil No. 00-2496(JAG). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. March 1, 2004. Nora Vargas-Acosta, Rio Piedras, PR, for Plaintiffs. *403 Jose R. Cintron-Rodriguez, Yvonne M. Menendez-

FRANCOIS, Judge MEMORANDUM OPINION (April 24, 2015) On February 14, 2014, Defendant Daas Enterprises, Inc. (“Daas”) filed Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Monetary Damage Claims), (Daas’ “Motion”).1 Plaintiffs filed their Opposition on March 10, 2014, and Daas filed its Reply on March 24, 2014. On July 8, 2014, the Court heard oral arguments o

MEMORANDUM SURRICK, District Judge. Presently before the Court is the Motion for Summary Judgment of Defendant, Officer David Brockway, and Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of Defendant, Officer Joshua Dewees. (ECF No. 33.) For the following reasons, the Motion will be granted in part and denied in part. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiffs Kevin Wilson and Julius

536 F.Supp. 578 (1982) HISPANIC COALITION ON REAPPORTIONMENT; Alfred Delgado, Nitza Santiago, Nayda Cintron, and Julio Olmedo, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. LEGISLATIVE REAPPORTIONMENT COMMISSION; Democratic Party City Committee of Philadelphia; David Glancey and Robert O'Donnell in their official capacities, William R. Davis, Secretary of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, his successor, if any, agents, assignees,

USCA4 Appeal: 20-1510 Doc: 42 Filed: 12/16/2022 Pg: 1 of 29 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 20-1510 ANITA TEKMEN, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. RELIANCE STANDARD LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant – Appellant.

812 F.Supp.2d 661 (2008) Gizella H. PITNER and Stanley R. Pitner, Plaintiffs, v. Sean MURRIN, Christopher McEvoy, William Cahill, and James D. Shaw, Defendants. Civil Action No. 07-355. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. June 25, 2008. Order Denying Reconsideration July 17, 2008. *664 Michael Consid

(Docs. 24, 25, 26, 27) Christina Reiss, District Judge Defendant Andrew Williams is charged with knowingly and intentionally possessing with intent to distribute cocaine base in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a) and 841(b)(1)(B). Pending before the court are Defendant's motion to suppress fruit

671 F.Supp.2d 658 (2009) JOHNSON, Petitioner, v. FOLINO, et al., Respondents. Civil Action No. 04-2835. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. November 23, 2009. *661 David L. Zuckerman, Samuel J.B. Angell, Federal Court Division, Defender Association of Philadelphia, Michael Hugh Gonzales, Fed. Comm. Def. Office Capita

88 F.Supp.2d 1351 (1999) Thomas S. FOUTS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Katherine HARRIS, et al., Defendants. No. 98-10031-CIV. United States District Court, S.D. Florida. October 25, 1999. David P. Horan, Horan & Horan, Key West, Florida, G.J. Rod Sullivan, Sullivan & Boyd, Jacksonville, Florida, for plaintiffs. *1352 Te

MEMORANDUM DALZELL, District Judge. Plaintiff Asteria Vives (“Asteria”) sues defendants Frank (“Frank”) and Miguelina (“Miguelina”) Rodriguez,1 asserting claims for breach of contract, unjust enrichment, conversion, fraud, and intentional infliction of emotional distress (“IIED”). Frank is Asteria’s brother, while Miguelina is Frank’s wife and Asteria’s sister-in-law.

642 F.Supp.2d 251 (2009) Carmen CARDOSO, Defendant-Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent. No. 05 Cr. 563 (RPP). United States District Court, S.D. New York. July 29, 2009. *253 George Royal V, Latham and Watkins LLP, Sam Schmidt, New York, NY, for Defendant-Petitioner. Levin Dassin, Acting United States Attor