⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

18 opinions for “CHYNOWETH v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES”

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990-11-28 · Published · cited 19× · 920 F.2d 648; 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 20691; 1990 WL 182322
BALDOCK, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff-appellant Mary Chynoweth appeals from a district court ruling denying her request to exceed the $75 per hour cap on attorney’s fees awarded to her pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412. Plaintiff argues that her attorney’s expertise in Social Security disability law constituted a “special factor” under U.S.C. § 2412(
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995-01-11 · Published · cited 29× · 44 F.3d 1355; 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 466; 1995 WL 8233
*1357 RIPPLE, Circuit Judge. After William Raines won entitlement to social security disability benefits and supplemental security income, the district court awarded him attorney fees and expenses under the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(2)(A). The Secretary of Health and Hum
United States Court of International Trade · 2007-10-15 · Published · cited 10× · 519 F. Supp. 2d 1291; 31 Ct. Int'l Trade 1600; 31 C.I.T. 1600; 29 I.T.R.D. (BNA) 2550; 2007 Ct. Intl. Trade LEXIS 151
519 F.Supp.2d 1291 (2007) FORMER EMPLOYEES OF BMC SOFTWARE, INC., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES SECRETARY OF LABOR, Defendant. Slip. Op. 07-150, Court No. 04-00229. United States Court of International Trade. October 15, 2007. Miller & Chevalier Chartered (Alexander D. Chinoy, Hal S. Shapiro, Kevin P. DiBartolo, and James B. Altman), for Plaintiffs.
District Court, District of Columbia · 2009-04-23 · Published · cited 8× · 609 F. Supp. 2d 85; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 34338; 2009 WL 1097413
609 F.Supp.2d 85 (2009) The HUMANE SOCIETY OF the UNITED STATES, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Defendant. Civil Action No. 07-1233 (JR). United States District Court, District of Columbia. April 23, 2009. *88 Jonathan Russell Lovvorn, Kimberly Denise Ockene, Rebecca Gerber Judd, The Humane Society of the United Stat
District Court, District of Columbia · 2009-04-23 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA THE HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE ) OF THE UNITED STATES, ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 07-1233 (JR) ) UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, ) ) Defendant. ) _________________
District Court, D. New Mexico · 2003-12-04 · Published · cited 2× · 305 F. Supp. 2d 1229; 174 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2911; 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24752
305 F.Supp.2d 1229 (2003) NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Plaintiff, and LOCAL UNION NO. 1385, Western Council of Industrial Workers, Plaintiff in Intervention, v. PUEBLO OF SAN JUAN, Defendant. No. CIV. 98-35 MV/RLP. United States District Court, D. New Mexico. December 4, 2003. *1230 Margery E. Lieber, Eric G. Moskowitz, Na
Caplash v. Nielsenpublic domain
District Court, W.D. New York · 2018-03-23 · Published · cited 19× · 294 F. Supp. 3d 123
ELIZABETH A. WOLFORD, United States District Judge BACKGROUND Plaintiff Jolly Manoj Caplash ("Plaintiff") commenced this litigation on December 29, 2015, and requested that this Court set aside the denial and subsequent refusals to reopen Plaintiff's Form I-130 family-based immigration petition (the "Petition") filed on behalf of his brother with the United States Citizenship and Immigratio
Asylumworks v. Wolfpublic domain
District Court, District of Columbia · 2023-03-31 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ASYLUMWORKS, et al., Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. 20-cv-3815 (BAH) v. Judge Beryl A. Howell ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION On February 7, 2022, this Court held that two rules co
Healey v. Leavittpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007-04-17 · Published · cited 41× · 485 F.3d 63
KATZMANN, Circuit Judge. This case arises out of a class action suit filed on behalf of home-bound Medicare beneficiaries who rely on Medicare coverage for various in-home services provided by home health agencies (“HHAs”). The merits of the plaintiffs’ action have already been resolved, and we are called upon to determine whether the plaintiffs are entitled to attorneys’ fees under
Healey v. Leavittpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007-04-17 · Published · cited 42× · 485 F.3d 63; 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 8697
485 F.3d 63 Ruth HEALEY, Marcia Lutwin, Jane Kozlowski, Margaret A. Walz, Roger Audette, Marion Morgan, by Her Next Friend Dorothy M. Hiltz, Julia M. Culver, by Her Next Friend Rev. Horace Mitchell, Bertha P. Chiplin, by Her Next Friend Alfred J. Chiplin, Sr., Linda Wierda, Plaintiffs-Appellees-Cross-Appellants,Madalyn Rovner, Roland Cote, Florentina Calderon, By Her Next Friend Eva Moreno, Helen Bagwell, Maxine Marmor, Deborah Sergesketter, Ka
Roark v. Barnhartpublic domain
District Court, W.D. Missouri · 2002-08-27 · Published · cited 7× · 221 F. Supp. 2d 1020; 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16169; 2002 WL 1997950
221 F.Supp.2d 1020 (2002) Larry ROARK, Plaintiff, v. Jo Anne BARNHART, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. No. 00-4084-CV-C-REL-SSA. United States District Court, W.D. Missouri, Central Division. August 27, 2002. *1021 Dewey Crepeau, Columbia, MO, for plaintiff. David Detar Newbert, Assistant United States Attorney
Marcus v. Sullivanpublic domain
District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1992-05-26 · Published · cited 2× · 793 F. Supp. 812; 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7152; 1992 WL 154021
793 F.Supp. 812 (1992) Esther MARCUS, Michelle W., by her next friend Marie W., Larry Ryne, Consuelo Allen, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs, v. Louis W. SULLIVAN, M.D., Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services, Defendant. No. 85 C 453. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, E.D. May 26, 1992.
District Court, D. Arizona · 1991-08-22 · Published · cited 5× · 774 F. Supp. 559; 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13506; 1991 WL 194093
774 F.Supp. 559 (1991) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Charles D. HUGELMEYER, Defendant. No. CIV 90-317-PHX-EHC. United States District Court, D. Arizona. August 22, 1991. Suzanne M. Chynoweth, Asst. U.S. Atty., Phoenix, Ariz., for plaintiff. Stephen W. Myers, T. Dawn Farrison, Myers, Barnes & Jenkins, Phoenix, Ariz., for defendant.
Hyatt v. Barnhartpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2002-08-22 · Published · cited 1× · 315 F.3d 239; 43 F. App'x 634; 2002 WL 31399151
Affirmed in part, vacated in part, and remanded by published opinion. Judge TRAXLER wrote the opinion, in which Judge WIDENER and Judge GOODWIN joined. OPINION TRAXLER, Circuit Judge. In this latest chapter of the Hyatt class action litigation, the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (the “SSA”) appeals the district court’s order granting plaintiffs’ Seventh and Eig
Hyatt v. Barnhartpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2002-08-22 · Published · cited 143× · 315 F.3d 239; 43 Fed. Appx. 634; 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 17601; 2002 WL 1931995
315 F.3d 239 Patrick H. HYATT; Herman O. Caudle; Mary P. Lovingood, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated; North Carolina Department of Human Resources, Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.Jo Anne B. BARNHART, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-Appellant. No. 01-2021. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Argued June 3, 2002.
United States Court of Federal Claims · 2010-03-02 · Published · cited 39× · 91 Fed. Cl. 689; 2010 U.S. Claims LEXIS 45; 2010 WL 785395
OPINION AND ORDER LETTOW, Judge. A post-trial judgment was issued in plaintiffs favor in this contract ease involving rates for supply of reserved power from hydroelectric units at The Dalles Dam on the Columbia River to an irrigation district in Oregon. See Dalles Irrigation Dist. v. United States, 88 Fed.Cl. 601 (2009) (“Dalles III ”). As allowed by that judgment, plaintiff (“the Distr
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004-11-12 · Published · cited 237× · 389 F.3d 973; 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 23781; 2004 WL 2569531
McCONNELL, J., joined by TYMKOVICH, J., concurring, and joined by HARTZ, J., and O’BRIEN, J., as to Part I. This Court has traditionally required a heightened showing for preliminary injunctions in three “disfavored” categories: injunctions that disturb the status quo, mandatory injunctions, and injunctions that afford the movant substantially all the relief it may recover at the conclusion of a
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004-11-12 · Published · cited 94× · 389 F.3d 973
389 F.3d 973 O CENTRO ESPIRITA BENEFICIENTE UNIAO DO VEGETAL, also known as Uniao do Vegetal (USA), Inc., a New Mexico corporation on its own behalf and on behalf of all its members in the United States; Jeffrey Bronfman, individually and as President of UDV-USA; Daniel Tucker, individually and as Vice-President of UDV-USA; Christina Barreto, individually and as Secretary of UDV-USA; Fernando Barreto, individually and as Treasurer of UDV-USA; Chris