⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “CHRISTOPHER AARON PARNELL”

District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2018-12-11 · Published · cited 0× · 340 F. Supp. 3d 800
Brian S. Miller, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Defendant Hennessy Industries, LLC's ("Hennessy") motion for summary judgment [Doc. No. 232] is granted, and Hennessy is dismissed. *801Ronald Thomas worked as a brake mechanic and manager at auto repair shops for approximately twelve years. Thomas Dep. 8:9-25, 17:13-21, Doc. No. 24
District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2018-12-21 · Published · cited 1× · 362 F. Supp. 3d 610
BRIAN S. MILLER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE The motions for summary judgment [Doc. Nos. 196, 201, 206] are granted as to the breach of warranty claims, granted in part as to the market share liability theory, and denied as to all other claims. The notices of adoption [219, 228] are recognized. The motions for summary judgment on the issue of punitive damages and motions to bifurcate [Doc. Nos. 204, 211, 221, 223] are denied. The
District Court, S.D. Florida · 2012-08-02 · Published · cited 2× · 881 F. Supp. 2d 1361; 2013 A.M.C. 2009; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 108055; 2012 WL 3140200
MEMORANDUM OPINION ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT DANIEL T.K. HURLEY, District Judge. THIS CAUSE is before the court on motions for summary judgment filed by defendants Warren Pumps, LLC (“Warren Pumps”), Crane Company (“Crane”) and Westinghouse Company (n/k/a CBS Corporation)(‘Westinghouse”)[ECF Nos. 105, 108 and 109]. For reasons outlined below, the court has determined to grant the motions.
District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2018-12-10 · Published · cited 0× · 350 F. Supp. 3d 756
Brian S. Miller, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE *757Defendant DCo LLC's motion for summary judgment [Doc. No. 197] is granted, and DCo is dismissed. Summary judgment is appropriate when there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact, and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. See Fed. R. Civ. P
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2018-08-06 · Published · cited 0× · 190 A.3d 1090; 455 N.J. Super. 569
CURRIER, J.A.D. *579*1096In this products liability case arising out of exposure to asbestos, we consider anew whether a manufacturer has a duty to warn about the risk of harm from exposure to asbestos-containing replacement parts integral to the func
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama · 2012-03-04 · Published · cited 6× · 469 B.R. 92; 2012 WL 715635; 2012 Bankr. LEXIS 842; 56 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 66
469 B.R. 92 (2012) In re JEFFERSON COUNTY, ALABAMA, a political subdivision of the State of Alabama Debtor. No. 11-05736-TBB. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama, Southern Division. March 4, 2012. *94 Ann E. Acker, Chicago, IL, Laura E. Appleby, New York, NY, Stephen B. Porterfield, Birmingham, AL, James Spiotto, Chicago, IL, fo
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2018-08-06 · Published · cited 0×
NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3520-13T4 ARTHUR G. WHELAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION ARMSTRONG INTERNATIONAL INC.; BURNHAM LLC; CARRIER CORP., individually, August 6, 2
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008-11-04 · Published · cited 123× · 548 F.3d 85; 2008 A.M.C. 2722; 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 22838; 2008 WL 4779582
548 F.3d 85 (2008) STOLT-NIELSEN SA, Stolt-Nielsen Transportation Group Ltd., a Odfjell ASA, Odfjell Seachem AS, Odfjell USA, Inc., Jo Tankers BV, Jo Tankers, Inc., and Tokyo Marine Co. Ltd., Petitioners-Appellees, v. ANIMALFEEDS INTERNATIONAL CORP., Respondent-Appellant, KP Chemical Corp., Respondent.[*] Docket No. 06-3474-cv. United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
People v. Hendersonpublic domain
Appellate Court of Illinois · 2017-07-14 · Published · cited 3× · 2016 IL App (1st) 142259
Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Illinois Official Reports Reason: I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008-11-04 · Published · cited 0×
06-3474-cv Stolt-Nielsen SA v. AnimalFeeds Int'l Corp. 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 2 FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT 3 August Term, 2007 4 (Argued: May 30, 2008 Decided: November 4, 2008) 5 Docket No. 06-3474-cv 6 ------------------------------------ 7 STOLT-NIELSEN SA, 8 Stolt-Nielsen T
District Court, District of Columbia · 2023-08-15 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JONATHAN SCOTT GRATION, et al., Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. 21-cv-1859 (BAH) v. Judge Beryl A. Howell ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION This action arises out of the bombing on June 25,
State v. Saintcallepublic domain
Washington Supreme Court · 2013-08-01 · Published · cited 97× · 178 Wash. 2d 34; 309 P.3d 326
González, J. ¶71 (concurring) — This splintered court is unanimous about one thing: Racial bias in jury selection is still a problem — “Solutions to the Problem, Of Course, wait.” Langston Hughes, Dinner Guest: Me, in 3 The Collected Works of Langston Hughes 173 (Arnold Rampersad ed., 2001). Batson challenges have not ended racial bias in jury selection. Only once has a race-based Batson challenge re
In Re Owens Corningpublic domain
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2004-02-02 · Published · cited 9× · 305 B.R. 175; 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6795; 2004 WL 194079
305 B.R. 175 (2004) In re OWENS CORNING, et al., Debtors. In re W.R. Grace & Co., et al., Debtors. In re USG Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, et al., Debtors. No. 00-3837, No. 00-3838, No. 00-3839, No. 00-3840, No. 00-3841, No. 00-3842, No. 00-3843, No. 00-3844, No. 00-3845, No. 00-3846, No. 00-3847, No. 00-3848, No. 00-3849, No. 00-3850, No. 00-3851, No. 00-3852, No. 00-3853, No. 00-3854, No. 01-1139, No. 01-1140, N
Supreme Court of the United States · 2015-06-26 · Published · cited 962× · 192 L. Ed. 2d 609; 135 S. Ct. 2584; 2015 U.S. LEXIS 4250; 576 U.S. 644
Justice KENNEDY delivered the opinion of the Court. The Constitution promises libertyto all within its reach, a liberty that includes certain specific rights that allow persons, within a lawful realm, to define and express their identity. The petitioners in these cases seek to find that liberty by marrying someone of the same sex and having their marriages deemed lawful on the same te
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston) · 2021-11-04 · Published · cited 0×
Reversed and Remanded and Memorandum Opinion filed November 4, 2021. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018-09-13 · Published · cited 316× · 903 F.3d 1090
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DANIEL CAMPBELL; et al, * No. 15-56990 Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. v. 2:04-cv-08592- AG-AJW CITY OF LOS ANGELES, Defendant-Appellee. CESAR MATA,
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2025-06-27 · Published · cited 33× · 143 F.4th 306
RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 25a0170p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ DENNIS SPEERLY; JOSEPH SIERCHIO; DARRIN │ DEGRAND; DANIEL DRAIN; WAVERS SMITH; RICHARD
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston) · 2018-12-21 · Published · cited 1× · 566 S.W.3d 410
Reversed and Remanded and Opinion filed December 21, 2018. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court Harr
State v. Saintcallepublic domain
Washington Supreme Court · 2013-08-01 · Published · cited 0×
Fl L E IN CLERKS OFFICE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WASHINGTON AUG 01 2013 UPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON STATE OF WASHINGTON, ) ) Respondent, ) No. 86257-5 ) v.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019-05-16 · Published · cited 2× · 2019 NY Slip Op 3883
Matter of Attorneys In Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a. (2019 NY Slip Op 03883) Matter of Attorneys In Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a. 2019 NY Slip Op 03883 Decided on May 16, 2019 Appellate Division, Third Department