Cases

OPINION BERCH, Justice. ¶ 1 This case presents the question whether a radiologist evaluating a chest x-ray for a pre-employment tuberculosis screening owes a duty to the examinee, and, if so, whether the standard of care imposes on the doctor the obligation to take reasonable steps to make known any serious abnormalities he observes. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND1

63 P.3d 1076 (2003) 204 Ariz. 339 Christine STANLEY, an individual, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Robert R. McCARVER, Jr., M.D.; Osborn, Nelson & Carr Portable X-Ray, Inc., Defendants-Appellees. No. 1 CA-CV 02-0328. Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department D. February 25, 2003. *1077 Karen L. Lugo

90 N.Y.2d 444 (1997) 684 N.E.2d 19 661 N.Y.S.2d 589 Marie A. Romano et al., Respondents, v. Horace R. Stanley, as Administrator of The Estate of Nancy A. Stanley, et al., Defendants, and Martel's of Broadway, Inc., et al., Appellants. Court of Appeals of the State of New York. Argued April 29, 1997 Decided July 1, 1997. <

Stanley v Kelly (2022 NY Slip Op 04847) Stanley v Kelly 2022 NY Slip Op 04847 Decided on August 4, 2022 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 19-1831 CHRISTINE DANCEL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GROUPON, INC., Defendant-Appellee. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the North

Supreme Court of Texas ══════════ No. 23-0067 ══════════ Christine Lenore Stary, Petitioner, v. Brady Neal Ethridge, Respondent ═══════════════════════════════════════ On Petition for Review from the Court of Appeals for the First District of

Christine Marie Stanley ("the wife") sued Jerry Lester Stanley, Jr. ("the husband"), for a divorce. In her complaint, the wife sought custody of the parties' two minor children, an award of child support, an equitable property division, and an award of alimony. The husband answered and denied the material allegations of the wife's complaint. The parties reached a settlement agreement, and on October 18, 2007, the trial court entered a divorce judgment that incorporated the term

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ No. 1D17-4429 _____________________________ BONNIE CHRISTINE JACHNA, Appellant, v. JAMES DAVIS, Appellee. _____________________________ On appeal from the Circuit Court for Bradford County. Stanley H. Griffis, III, Judge. August 31, 2018 PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. WOLF, LE

956 A.2d 1 (2008) Gary STANLEY, Respondent Below, Appellant, v. Ellen G. STANLEY, Petitioner Below, Appellee. No. 260, 2007. Supreme Court of Delaware. Submitted: May 7, 2008. Decided: August 4, 2008. *2 Megan Rush Walstrom, Esquire, Rahaim & Saints, Newark, DE, for Appellant. Christine K. Demsey, Esqu

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 19-1831 CHRISTINE DANCEL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GROUPON, INC., Defendant-Appellee. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the North

Opinion issued December 15, 2022 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-21-00101-CV ——————————— CHRISTINE LENORE STARY, Appellant V. BRADY NEAL ET

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA September 2019 Term _______________ FILED November 22, 2019 No. 19-0317 released at 3:00 p.m. _______________ EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK

Stanley v New York City Hous. Auth. (2018 NY Slip Op 03726) Stanley v New York City Hous. Auth. 2018 NY Slip Op 03726 Decided on May 23, 2018 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporti

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JOHN J. THARP, JR., District Judge. Peter Stanley, a boiler engineer who worked at a number of Midwestern power plants throughout the 1960s, died of mesothelioma on March 9, 2013. This lawsuit, which he filed with his wife after his diagnosis but before his death, seeks damages in negligence1 for his exposure to asbestos dust and fibers whi

ORDER [Motions filed November 18, 2013] JESUS G. BERNAL, District Judge. Before the Court is a Motion Summary Judgment, a Motion to Exclude Testimony of Plaintiffs Case-Specific Experts, and a Motion for Daubert Evidentiary Hearing filed by Defendant Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation. (Doc. Nos. 55, 61, 63.) After considering the papers in support of and in opposition to the

AMENDED MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS McMahon, C.J.: The issue raised by this garden-variety securities fraud complaint is simple: is an offering document that fully discloses all substantive investment risks materially misleading if it fails to disclose that a government agency, in a country very different than ours, met with the issuer to underscore the issuer’s oblig

Opinion of March 3, 2011, Withdrawn, Affirmed and Substitute Opinion filed May 26, 2011. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT STANLEY ZALESKI and DENISE ZALESKI, Appellants, v. STATE FARM FLORIDA INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee. No. 4D19-2478 [February 24, 2021] Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County;

SUMMARY ORDER Petitioners-Appellants Christine Falls Corporation and Trafalgar Power (“Trafalgar”) appeal from an Amended Judgment entered on May 15, 2012, which incorporated a February 21, 2012 decision and order of the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York (Hurd, J.) granting summary judgment in favor of U.S. Bank National Association, FKA State Street Bank & Trust (“Bank”), on Trafalgar’s breac

Matter of Stanley v Lomax (2026 NY Slip Op 00904) Matter of Stanley v Lomax 2026 NY Slip Op 00904 Decided on February 18, 2026 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opi