Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “CHRISTINA MARIE WHITNEY”
Kelly-Whitney v. Kelly-Whitneypublic domain
2011 VT 12 Marie Kelly-Whitney, v. Christina Kelly-Whitney. No. 2010-075, OCTOBER TERM, 2010. Supreme Court of Vermont. Filed: January 31, 2011. ENTRY ORDER In the above-entitled cause, the Clerk will enter: ¶ 1. Plaintiff Marie Kelly-Whitney appeals from a decision of the family court, which reversed and remanded a magistrate's decision on c
Whitney Information Network, Inc. v. Gagnonpublic domain
353 F.Supp.2d 1208 (2005) WHITNEY INFORMATION NETWORK, INC. and Russ Whitney, Plaintiffs, v. Matt GAGNON and Mazu Publishing Company, Defendants. No. 2:03-CV-677-FTM29SPC. United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Fort Myers Division. January 14, 2005. *1209 Scott W. Rothstein, Christina Marie Kitterman, Melissa Britt Lewis, Ro
347 F.Supp.2d 1242 (2004) WHITNEY INFORMATION NETWORK, INC. and Russ Whitney, Plaintiffs, v. XCENTRIC VENTURES, LLC; Badbusinessbureau.org; and Ed Magedson, Defendants. No. 2:04-CV-47-FTM-29SPC. United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Fort Myers Division. December 8, 2004. Christina Marie Kitterman, Rothstein Rosenfeldt, Scott W. Rothstein, Rothstein,
EBC I, Inc. v. America Online, Inc.public domain
356 B.R. 631 (2006) In re EBC I, INC., f/k/a eToys, Inc., Reorganized Debtor. EBC I, Inc., f/k/a eToys, Inc., Plaintiff, v. America Online, Inc., Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 01-00706 (MFW). Adversary No. 03-50003. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware. December 7, 2006. *632 *633 Derek
Astropower Liquidating Trust v. Xantrex Technology, Inc. (In Re Astropower Liquidating Trust)public domain
335 B.R. 309 (2005) In re ASTROPOWER LIQUIDATING TRUST, f/k/a Astropower, Inc., Debtor. Astropower Liquidating Trust, f/k/a Astropower, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Xantrex Technology, Inc.; Mossadiq S. Umedaly; and Raymond James Ltd., Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 04-10322 (MFW). Adversary No. 05-50867. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware. December 22, 2005.
EOG Resources, Inc. v. Soo Line Railroad Co.public domain
Filed 7/15/15 by Clerk of Supreme Court IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2015 ND 187 EOG Resources, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Soo Line Ra
740 F.Supp.2d 1207 (2010) In Re: BANK OF AMERICA WAGE AND HOUR EMPLOYMENT LITIGATION This Order Relates to All Cases. No. 10-MD-2138-JWL. United States District Court, D. Kansas. September 10, 2010. *1208 Brendan J. Donelon, Donelon, P.C., George A. Hanson, Virginia Stevens Crimmins, Stueve Siegel Hanson, L.L.P., Kansas City, MO, Cha
Lippe v. Bairnco Corp.public domain
249 F.Supp.2d 357 (2003) Richard A. LIPPE, Archie R. Dykes, and John J. Robbins, as Trustees for Keene Creditors Trust, Plaintiffs, v. BAIRNCO CORPORATION et al., Defendants. No. 96 CIV. 7600(DC). United States District Court, S.D. New York. March 14, 2003. *360 Levy Phillips & Konigsberg, LLP by Stanley J. Levy, Esq., Brian
In re Application to the Bar of Statepublic domain
On motion of F. Aaron Negangard, Chief Deputy Attorney General of the State of Indiana, and Cathleen M. Shrader, President of the State Board of Law Examiners, both members of the Bar of this Court, each applicant named in Exhibit A is by Order of this Court now duly sworn and admitted to practice as an attorney at law, and their respective names are ordered entered upon the Roll of Attorneys of this Court in the office of the Clerk of the Supreme Court, Cou
Lesch v. United Statespublic domain
612 F.3d 975 (2010) Sherry LESCH, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America; Louis Gumpenburger, Appellees. No. 09-1968. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: January 15, 2010. Filed: July 15, 2010. *977 Brian S. McChesney, argued, of St. Louis, MO, for appellant. Christina Bahr Moore, AU
in Re Eduardo Del Pinopublic domain
Opinion issued March 4, 2021 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-20-00674-CV ——————————— IN RE EDUARDO DEL PINO, SPRING DEL PINO, ROBERT RUGGLES, GLORIA RUGGLES, ROBERT DAWKINS, DEMETRIA DAWKINS, EDDIE DELANEY, JENNIFER DELANEY, LEROY DELK, CAROLE DELK, MARTI
Hahn v. Farmakis-Kingpublic domain
[Cite as Hahn v. Farmakis-King, 2024-Ohio-786.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT ASHTABULA COUNTY LINDA S. HAHN, CASE NO. 2023-A-0015 Plaintiff-Appellant, Civil Appeal from the - vs - Court of Common Pleas CHRISTINA FARMAKIS-KING, AS CO-EXECUTRIX OF
OPINION MAASSEN, Justice. I. INTRODUCTION The Office of Children's Services (OCS) took custody of two young girls because of their parents' substance abuse and neglect. OCS took custody of the parents' son shortly after his birth for the same reasons. The trial court terminated the parents' rights to all three children, who are Indian children
NOTICE: The attorneys on the attached list have the opportunity to comply with outstanding requirements prior to the effective date of the Supreme Court Order and not be administratively suspended. DATE: 11/14/2023 PENNSYLVANIA CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION PAGE: 1 TIME: 14:.42:19 NON- COMPLIANT LAWYERS USER ID: jilgenfr
San Jacinto River Authority v. Andy Raypublic domain
Reversed and Rendered and Memorandum Opinion filed May 27, 2021. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-19-00095-CV SAN JACINTO RIVER AUTHORITY, Appellant V. ANDY RAY, ET AL., Appellees1 On Appeal from the 125th District Court H
Torres v. Simpatico, Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER CATHERINE D. PERRY, District Judge. This Federal Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) class action suit is before me on defendants’ motion to compel arbitration and to dismiss without prejudice, or alternatively to stay the action pending arbitration. Plaintiffs are five individual unit franchisees of the Stratus Building Solution franchise system. D
ORDER DENYING TRANSFER KATHRYN H. VRATIL, Acting Chairman. Before the entire Panel *: Plaintiffs in one action pending in the District of Minnesota and two actions pending in the Southern District of Ohio have moved, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407, to centralize this litigation in the District of Minnesota. The litigation currently consists of the 102 actions listed on Schedule
Whitney v. Whitneypublic domain
Martin, J. At the threshold of this investigation the question is presented whether this action can be maintained. The action was in form an action in equity to obtain a construction of the last will and testament of Joshua Whitney, deceased, but its manifest object and purpose was to determine the legal title to certain real estate which was in the possession of the appellants. The appellants contend that as the questions involved
MARTIN, Circuit Judge, with whom ROSENBAUM and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges join, dissenting from the denial of rehearing, en banc: Chastity Jones, a black woman, applied for a position at Catastrophe Management Solutions (“CMS”). She got the job. But after she was hired, the human resources manager—who is white—told Ms. Jones the company had to rescind its job offer becaus
709 F.Supp.2d 1375 (2010) In re AMBULATORY PAIN PUMP-CHONDROLYSIS PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION. MDL No. 2139. United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation. May 5, 2010. Before KATHRYN H. VRATIL, Acting Chairman, JOHN G. HEYBURN II, Chairman[*], ROBERT L. MILLER, JR.[*], DAVID R. HANSEN, W. ROYAL FURGESON, JR., FRANK C. DAMRELL, JR. and DAV