Cases

GEORGE J. HAZEL, United States District Judge *396In these related cases, Plaintiffs challenged Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross's decision to include a citizenship question on the 2020 Census. Plaintiffs claimed the decision was arbitrary and capricious in violation of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), unconstitutional in violation of the Constitution's Enumeration

GEORGE J. HAZEL, United States District Judge TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Findings of Fact...692 A. The Secretary's Decision (Administrative Record)...693 1. Genesis of Secretary Ross's Interest in Including a Citizenship Question...693 2. Manufacturing DOJ's VRA Rationale...695 3. Census Burea

1. Concrete injury-in-fact To establish standing's injury-in-fact element, a plaintiff must show it "has sustained or is immediately in danger of sustaining a direct injury" as a result of the challenged action. Spokeo , 136 S.Ct. at 1552 (quotation omitted). A plaintiff's injury or threat of inj

GEORGE J. HAZEL, United States District Judge Every ten years, the Census Bureau takes on the herculean task of counting the entire population of the United States. The Census Bureau expends considerable resources on this task, presumably to ensure that the count is as accurate as possible because an accurate count is essential to ensure, among other things, equal representation-a hallmark of our Constitution. As the 2020 Census app

JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part: I concur in the majority’s decision to vacate the district court’s order denying Maxi Dinga Sopo’s 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition and to remand for entry of judgment in Mr. Sopo’s favor, ordering that Mr. Sopo promptly receive an individualized bond hearing. I join fully in Section V of the majority opinion, wh

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA VO TRAN, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 18-739 (RDM) U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff Vo Tran, proceeding pro se, brings this action against the U.S. Department of Justice, the Federal Bureau

Cho v HJB of Bayside Corp. (2025 NY Slip Op 03702) Cho v HJB of Bayside Corp. 2025 NY Slip Op 03702 Decided on June 18, 2025 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. Thi

19-3376-cv Cho et al. v. BlackBerry Ltd. et al. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term, 2020 Argued: October 30, 2020 Decided: March 11, 2021 Docket No. 19-3376-cv YONG M. CHO, BATUHAN ULUG,

¶ 1 A party must provide sufficient competent evidence to establish the essential elements of the action or, at the very least, a genuine issue of material facts as to those elements. Here, an inattentive drunk driver struck the plaintiff and several pedestrians in an unmarked crosswalk. The plaintiff’s assertion that had the city of Seattle (City) installed a pedestrian island, she would have stopped and waited for all oncoming traffic to proceed before c

REGGIE B. WALTON, United States District Judge Catholic Charities and eight individual plaintiffs brought this civil action against the defendant, the United States Department of Homeland Security, under the Freedom of Information Act ("FOIA"), 5 U.S.C. § 552 (2012), seeking, inter alia, documents relating t

Filed 6/24/19 CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION * IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE PNEUMA INTERNATIONAL, INC., Plaintiff and Appellant, A151536 v. YONG KWON CHO et al., (Alameda County

168 P.3d 17 (2007) Calvin K. CHO, Hee Cho, David Cho, Tenny Cho, Karen Cho, and Sharon Cho, Petitioners/Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. STATE of Hawai`i, Respondent/Defendant-Appellee. No. 27458. Supreme Court of Hawaii. September 19, 2007. *19 Peter Van Nam Esser, Honolulu, and Mark S. Kawata, for petitioners/plaintiffs-appellants, on

TATEL, Circuit Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part: I agree that the BOP regulation prohibiting electric and electronic instruments is a reasonable interpretation of the Zimmer Amendment and therefore does not violate the Administrative Procedure Act. I also have no doubt that the government can constitutionally restrict the use and possession of electric guitars in

Charles M. Caldwell, United States Bankruptcy Judge This Memorandum Opinion and Order serves as the Court's findings of fact and conclusions of law. The United States Trustee (Plaintiff) alleges that Tobias Harold Elsass (Defendant) concealed property and provided false information when filing his bankruptcy case. This pattern continued during the course of administration. Plaintiff seeks denial of Defendant's discharge under Secti

BY THE COURT: *953 On June 15, 2016, this Court published a decision vacating the district court's March 4, 2014, order dismissing Appellant's 28 U.S.C. § 2241

I. Background A. Factual and Statutory Background The lengthy factual history of the Dakota Access Pipeline, a 1,200-mile domestic-oil pipeline running from North Dakota to Illinois, is set forth in this Court's prior Opinions and need not be repeated here. See, e.g., Standing Rock Sioux Tribe v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Standing Rock I),

MEMORANDUM OPINION KETANJI BROWN JACKSON, United States District Judge On February 18, 2017, Plaintiff Young Cho filed an eleven-count complaint in D.C. Superior Court alleging that Defendants Steven McCool, Joseph Mallon, and Mallon & McCool, LLC (collectively, “Defendants”) committed a series of fraudulent and negligent acts while representing Cho

Gerard E. Lynch, Circuit Judge: This case requires us to consider the application of the Rooker - Feldman doctrine where plaintiffs complain of injuries flowing from settlement agreements that were "so-ordered" by state-court judges. Plaintiffs-Appellants Sung Cho, Nagle Washrite LLC (Cho's business entity), David Diaz, and Jameelah El

CALABRESI, Circuit Judge: This appeal concerns the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) denial of an alien’s motion to remand his case so that he could apply, under 8 U.S.C. § 1186a(e)(4)(A), for an extreme hardship waiver of the ordinary requirement that a conditional permanent resident file a joint petition with his spouse to remove the

PER CURIAM: John Tsibo Fynn, a native and citizen of Ghana, seeks review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’s (“BIA”) order affirming the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of his application for a waiver of the joint-filing requirement to remove the conditions on his lawful permanent residence under 8 U.S.C. § 1186a(c)(4)(B). The