Cases

PER CURIAM. Respondent Charles E. Houston, Jr. failed to perfect an appeal for a client and, in two separate matters, neglected to pay a videographer and court reporting service. Additionally he failed to cooperate with the disciplinary investigations into the ensuing complaints. We suspend Respondent for nine months, order him to pay the costs of the proceeding, and require him

MEMORANDUM OPINION JAMES E. BOASBERG, United States District Judge Suits brought before federal courts based on diversity jurisdiction under 28 *151 U.S.C § 1332 must meet a minimum amount-in-controversy requirement of $75,000. Whether this requirement has been

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Charles E. Parker, Jr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court

MURPHY, Judge. *104 *183 Plaintiff, Terry Parker ("Parker"), challenges the trial court's order granting summary judgment to Defendant, Barbara Colson Myers ("Myers"), on Parker's negligence

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON CHARLES DAMIEN DARDEN v. TONY PARKER, WARDEN Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lake County No. 04-CR-8670 Lee Moore, Judge No. W2005-00982-CCA-R3-HC - Filed November 30, 2005 The Petitioner, Charles Damien Darden, appeals the lower court’s denial of his petition for habeas corpus relief. The State has filed a motio

OPINION BY JUSTICE D. ARTHUR KELSEY Lindsey Parker sued Carilion Clinic, Carilion Healthcare Corporation (collectively, "Carilion"), and two Carilion employees, Christy Davis and Lindsey Young, claiming that they had disclosed her confidential medical information to others. Parker served process on Carilion but did not serve Davis or Young. The circuit court granted Carilion's demurrers

DAVIS, Judge. Terry Parker ("Plaintiff") appeals from the trial court's 31 March 2016 order granting the motion for summary judgment of Barbara Colson Myers ("Defendant"). After careful review, we dismiss for lack of appellate jurisdiction. Factual and Procedural Background Defendant's brother, Henry Colson ("Henry"), owned two pit bulls, which were kept at a residence owned by their

IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

Opinion HUFFMAN, J. Stephen C. Parker, as administrator of the estate of Irma E. Young, deceased (the Estate), filed this petition under Probate Code section 850, subdivision (a),1 to request an order and judgment establishing the Estate’s ownership of certain real property and personal property held by and associated with a number of land trusts and business trusts created during th

314 S.W.3d 798 (2010) Theresa PARKER, Respondent/Cross-Appellant, v. AMERICAN PUBLISHING CO., et. al., Appellants/Cross-Respondents. Nos. ED 92334, ED 92386. Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three. June 29, 2010. Thomas R. Carnes, St. Louis, MO, for appellants. D.B. Amon, St. Charles, MO, for respondent. LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, Judge.<

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Nathaniel E. Dozier, Jr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his civil action against Henry Parker and William A. Robertson, Jr., members of the Board of Supervisors of Prince George County, Virginia, and Joseph A. Leming, a former member.

PER CURIAM: Appellants Carey K. Parker and Mary E. Parker appeal the tax court’s dismissal of their petition challenging tax deficiencies found by the Internal Revenue Service. Finding the Parkers’ arguments to be entirely meritless, we affirm. The Parkers did not file income tax returns for the years 1991 t

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Nathaniel E. Dozier, Jr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his civil action against Henry Parker and William A. Robertson, Jr., members of the Board of Supervisors of Prince George County, Virginia, and Joseph A. Leming, a former member.

V. Plaintiffs second contention-that Parker's insurance application contains critical misstatements-also has merit. Below, *384the application is reproduced in pertinent part: Question 3b and its answer are at issue: In the past 3 years have you had or been treated for: * * *<

455 S.E.2d 502 (1995) Michael J. NASSER, Sr., Administrator, etc. v. Charles E. PARKER, M.D., et al. Record No. 940758. Supreme Court of Virginia. March 3, 1995. William F. Krebs, Fairfax (Kellogg, Krebs & Moran, on briefs), for appellant. Brian N. Casey, Norfolk (John Franklin, III, Taylor & Walker, on brief), for appellee Charles E. Parker, M.D.

CLAY, Circuit Judge. Plaintiffs Charles Brian and Megan Fox, individually and as parents and next friends of their minor children Hailey, Matthew, Rebecca, and Sarah Fox, appeal the district court's May 30, 2018 order granting summary judgment in favor of Defendant Amazon.com, Inc. Plaintiffs' complaint alleges that Defendant (1) sold Plaintiff Megan Fox a defective or unreasonably dang

ON SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and KING, GARWOOD, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, DUHÉ, WIENER, BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, STEWART, PARKER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. BY THE COURT: A member of the court in active service having requested a poll on the su

MESKILL, Circuit Judge, dissenting: I respectfully dissent. The majority opinion holds that Charles Hemstreet’s (Hemstreet) petition for a writ of habeas corpus must be denied because “the record does not show that Hem-street suffered prejudice from any alleged omissions by his counsel.” The majority marshals the evidence of Hemstreet’s guilt as if the sufficiency of the evidence, considere