Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “CHARLES D ELL”
Bunton, Charles D.public domain
P¢@W\ 5 O\/Wr\e§ 'D »/L)>w/\)m\f\ wm mt Tvc#u L&?>“m 1101 F¢~/\@LM N@~f+k o RECElvED m /DDN(L 1001 Ll/B< 1»1’503, amfth §+mD< QAME cw\M€§ Y;-Oxm»\) N@,\Dv»\'-‘D c.»O’L/Ciow'/M 141 *D¢M cf@¢\¢i _, €M(O§ed 190-v Q;M@ LSC(WL\£M@ o)@wh;¢) n zw”r@% 0(;3@4 Am.§w¢(.i} k dam wm pb-(u\/o\ro{wl V\/\ mf»(l\ZO-MVV lb %JF|/
Bunton, Charles D.public domain
.' m (WE @@U /Z/T ®/P CLK€,(/\/LWAL />vPP€/§(,§ M 001 C/b\@w\€/S @W»Jm‘n j ` Q/\a\/"{`Df v - ' " ' c /_ god/wee MOR:CE|VED lN. ~ /FW'M C@MF[ 613 A-.-{y{)ewl§ mo l@m,§, _ CDURTOF CRlM!NALAPPEALS Q%()@V,A@ML ocT 26 2015 ` Abe’tAcosta,Clevk > M@W>~ F'¢>Q vz»¢ve w me Mpu@»m@w me Wrz¢m: ,MWW§ /IY) Jf[?\@ )L}E>Ywmw€ '\/Mje§ ap “FLL@ Qom»rT'a\@ CnM./mj AW@M§ ~OWQ T@/\m§/ W¢Jh)f v\lo\/M Slfmw 1b he CQMJL`%€/ \Co\\om)l'nj f \. No M\QWJJ Fe,meelj all lau/v wade 9mm a,\/v§¢dé){)w{@m@v)f wl vb\ol ®
Charles v. Vestpublic domain
Bailey, Judge. Case Summary [1] Zerlie Charles ("Charles") appeals the trial court's ruling, following a bench trial, against her in her complaint against Vickie Vest ("Vest") for defamation. On appeal, she raises only one issue, namely, whether the trial court's ruling on her defamation claim was contrary to law. We hold that it was, and we reverse. Facts and Procedural History [2] V
Charles Hedlund v. Charles Ryanpublic domain
Opinion by Judge N.R. SMITH; Concurrence by Judge BEA; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge WARDLAW. N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judge: ORDER The opinion filed April 24, 2014, and reported at 750 F.3d 793, is withdrawn. Because the court’s opinion is withdrawn, Appellant’s petition for rehearing and petition for rehearing en banc is moot. A superseding opinion will be filed con
William Charles Hughes v. Statepublic domain
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-19-00114-CR ___________________________ WILLIAM CHARLES HUGHES, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS On Appeal from the 271st District Court
State of Tennessee v. Charles Lee Warnerpublic domain
05/09/2018 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs October 18, 2017 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. CHARLES LEE WARNER Appeal from the Circuit Court for Rutherford County No. F-72670 David M. Bragg, Judge
Prison Legal News v. Charles Ryanpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT PRISON LEGAL NEWS, a project of: No. 19-17449 other Human Rights Defense Center, Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:15-cv-02245- v. ROS CHARLES L. RYAN, in his official capacity as Director of the Arizona OPINION Department of Corrections and in his individual capacity; GAIL RITTENHOUSE,
D & D Used Autos v. Everett Frazier, Commissioner, West Virginia Division of Motor Vehiclespublic domain
IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA FILED D & D USED AUTOS, September 4, 2024 Appellant Below, Petitioner ASHLEY N. DEEM, CHIEF DEPUTY CLERK INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS
Charles D. Price v. Statepublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE FILED JANUARY SESSION, 1998 June 24, 1998 Cecil W. Crowson CHARLES D. PRICE, ) Appellate Court Clerk C.C.A. NO. 01C01-9702-CR-00042 ) Appe llant, ) ) ) DAVIDSON COUNTY VS
Wilson, Charles Claypublic domain
\.J J~gz+-11 Mr.Charles Clay Wilson T•D.C.J.-CID#521150 John M.Wynne Unit 810 FM 2821 Huntsvil
Cox, Charles Laymanpublic domain
‘M,%' '05 1a fhe,£our* op Crim/`na l A/;deals Ausiri`n From$ £harl~es Loymon[’ox //Om se .TuI¢/Z‘)/ 20/5 gill L’/S.f_mp,n{s L/m`i' RECEWE. |N' 60[ ur 59/ s c Amm 1450/730 79/07 couRT oF cRr..nmALAPp,_/u.s ' v 4 To f Abe/!lcos'hy/ C'/erl< - AUJG 2915 lea wR`ZB'qS/~DB ` Ab@m@@§ia,©&evk 779 #)e yonorablaC/e/l'< af+})e,£ourf.' &m@l?ow fha/les layman fox/am se , ana' asks H)e E/e//< +of/`/e %}$ documen+ in+p Hre faa/fo¢’,£/im.’nn/A,nnen/s Reco mlann',a/a£e in +he file wire?ond)na wi#') 'H\e a#a£h
Burrell, Ashley Charlespublic domain
<t D, F)ql_p~ A~eL "COSTA, Ct£fl ~e. RECEIVED IN t.l:ttP.;T of C.P!IMit-it\L (\PPEAI..S OFio:AS COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS P.o. Sox. tJ-308, CAPITOL ~-rATlOIJ MA
Charles Macklin v. State of Tennesseepublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs May 3, 2011 CHARLES MACKLIN v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Criminal Court for Shelby County Nos. 08-00832; 08-06106 John T. Fowlkes, Jr., Judge No. W2010-01768-CCA-R3-PC - Filed June 15, 2011 The Petitioner, Charles Macklin, appeals as of right from the Shelby County Criminal Cour
State of Tennessee v. Charles Travis Maplespublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs October 25, 2016 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. CHARLES TRAVIS MAPLES Appeal from the Criminal Court for Knox County No. 101752 Steven W. Sword, Judge No. E2016-00589-CCA-R3-CD – Filed December 5, 2016 The defendant, Charles Travis Maples, appeals his Knox County Criminal Court jury convictions of
Robert Lemke v. Charles Ryanpublic domain
OPINION CANBY, Senior Circuit Judge: Petitioner Robert D. Lemke appeals the district court’s denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus brought under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Lemke contends that subjecting him to retrial for felony murder violated the Double Jeopardy Clause because a jury earlier had impliedly acquitted him of the robbery underlying the felony murder charge. We conclude that the Arizo
CHARLES M. COATES v. UNITED STATESpublic domain
GLICKMAN, Associate Judge: On trial for murder, appellant Charles Coates admitted having shot and killed his cousin and close friend Eddie Leonard, but claimed he did so unintentionally and in self-defense when Leonard, freaking out on PCP, threatened him with a gun. The key witness against appellant— the government’s only witness capable of disputing his account of the shooting
Zerlie Charles v. Vickie Vest (mem. dec.)public domain
MEMORANDUM DECISION FILED Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), Oct 24 2017, 10:28 am this Memorandum Decision shall not be CLERK regarded as precedent or cited before any Indiana Supreme Court
State of Tennessee v. Charles Phillip Maxwellpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs October 19, 2010 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. CHARLES PHILLIP MAXWELL Appeal from the Criminal Court for Davidson County No. 2008-D-3374 Monte Watkins, Judge No. M2009-02323-CCA-R3-CD - Filed February 1, 2011 Following a bench trial, the Defendant, Charles Phillip Maxwell, was convicted of driving
Charles Lugo v. Statepublic domain
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-08-00263-CR Charles Lugo, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee
Charles Lugo v. Statepublic domain
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-08-00263-CR Charles Lugo, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, 368TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. 04-223-K368, HONORABLE BURT CARNES, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OPINION