Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “CHARLENE CONWAY ESTATE v. CONWAY”
Charlene C. Bradford v. Josh Terrypublic domain
12/27/2021 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE September 1, 2020 Session CHARLENE C. BRADFORD v. JOSH TERRY ET AL. Appeal from the Chancery Court for Williamson County No. 43291, 2014-201 James G. Martin III, Chancellor _______________________________
NUMBER 13-98-499-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI ___________________________________________________________________ CHARLENE MILLS BROWN, ET AL., Appellants, v.
Raymond v. Halifax Hospital Medical Centerpublic domain
COWART, Judge. This case involves the question of whether an insured has a cause of action against an insurer because the insurer mistakenly paid a third party (a hospital) and the third party voluntarily refunded to the insurer; the hospital bill being admittedly not covered by the insurance policy. An insured, now deceased, had a medical insurance policy with appellee Blue Cross providing medical covera
Maverick Gaming LLC v. USApublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MAVERICK GAMING LLC, No. 23-35136 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:22-cv- 05325-DGE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; OPINION U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR; DEB HAALAND, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Interior; BRYAN NEWLAND, in his official capacity as Assistant Secretary Ind
2020 IL App (1st) 191648 No. 1-19-1648 Opinion filed September 14, 2020 First Division ______________________________________________________________________________ IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINO
Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest to Illinois Official Repor
State v. DeBartolopublic domain
[Cite as State v. DeBartolo, 2012-Ohio-3449.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 97453 STATE OF OHIO PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE vs.
County of Cameron v. Brownpublic domain
Justice O’NEILL delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Chief Justice PHILLIPS, Justice ENOCH, Justice BAKER, Justice HANKINSON, and Justice RODRIGUEZ joined. In this wrongful-death action, plaintiffs claim that a failed block of lights at the end of an elevated and curving causeway, with narrow shoulders and limited access, suddenly and unexpectedly plunged motorists into darkne
Barkley v. United Homes, LLCpublic domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER MATSUMOTO, District Judge. Plaintiffs Sandra Barkley, Mary Lodge, Dewitt Mathis, Sylvia Gibbons, Sylvia Gibbons as the Administrator of the Estate of Rodney Gibbons, Lisa McDale, Miles McDale, and Charlene Washington (collectively “plaintiffs”) commenced this action against United Homes, LLC; United Property Group, LLC; Galit Network, LLC (the “UH Defendants”); Yaron Hershc
Williams v. National Security Insurancepublic domain
OPINION MYRON H. THOMPSON, District Judge. This civil-rights action was brought by two African-American plaintiffs, Mary V. Williams and Terrence D. Williams Merriweather on behalf of themselves and a putative class of similarly situated persons.1 As last amended, the plaintiffs’ complaint claims, among other things, that defendant National Security Insurance Company (“NSIC”)
Hutt v. Gibson Fiber Glass Products, Inc.public domain
NATHANIEL R. JONES, Circuit Judge. Plaintiffs-appellants, Joseph D. Hutt, administrator of the estate of decedent Kathy Sue Deuser, Jack S. Deuser and Todd Deu-ser (collectively referred to as “the Administrators”) appeal the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of defendant Fuhry, Inc. For the following reasons, we affirm in part and reverse in part. I. On July 29, 1986, Jack and Kat
Lord v. Secretary of Health and Human Servicespublic domain
In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS Filed: February 9, 2016 * * * * * * * * * * * * * PUBLISHED DECISION LESLIE LORD and RANDALL * MAGNUSKI, legal representatives of a * No. 12-255V deceased minor child, C.L., *
Hutt v. Gibson Fiber Glass Productspublic domain
914 F.2d 790 Prod.Liab.Rep.(CCH)P 12,587Joseph D. HUTT, Administrator of the Estate of Kathy SueDeuser; Jack S. Deuser, Jr.; and Todd Deuser,Co-Administrators of the Estate of JackS. Deuser, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.GIBSON FIBER GLASS PRODUCTS, INC., et al., Defendants,Fuhry, Inc., Defendant-Appellee. No. 89-5731. United States Court of Appeals,Sixth Circuit.
West 17th Resources, LLC, Pamela Mika Wolf, and Thomas Mika v. Lucian A. Pawelek and Carleen J. Pawelekpublic domain
ACCEPTED 04-14-00668-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 2/6/2015 3:59:47 PM
Beres v. United Statespublic domain
OPINION HORN, Judge. At issue is the scope of the rights of way in these multifaceted takings cases, involving numerous plaintiffs, multiple statutory land grants, different deed types, a prescriptive easement and subsequent conveyances over a more than one hundred year time period for property located along the eastern shore of Lake Sammamish in King County, Washington. The plaintiffs in these consolidated<
Weinberger v. Jacksonpublic domain
ORDER INGRAM, District Judge. Plaintiff moves for certification of plaintiff and defendant-underwriter classes pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 23 and Local Rule 200-6 1 in this action for violations of the federal securities laws and state claims.2 *842I. ORDER OF CERTIFICATION
Lilley v. Copelandpublic domain
Jim Johnson, Justice. This is a suit for rescission of a deed and includes a third-party complaint. Appellees W. F. and Minnie Bradford owned property which had been subdivided into building lots and then re-subdivided. This action involves Lot 23 of Bradford’s Replat. Appellants Wayne and Lillian Lilley had bought several lots in Bradford’s Replat over a period of time. Th
Digitally signed by Susan Williams Reason: I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS document Date: 2023.07.12 16:12:00 -05'00' Opinion Delivered: April 2, 2020 IN RE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE REVISED ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO. 10 PER CURIAM The court hereby adopts and implements the revised Administrative Order No. 10. Effective immediately, the new guidelin
In Re Derderianpublic domain
DECISION The issue before the Court relates to the criminal case ofState v. Michael Derderian, case number K1-03-0655A. On February 20, 2003, the Defendant's nightclub, The Station, burned to the ground, killing 100 people. The Defendant was charged with 100 counts of involuntary manslaughter under the criminal negligence theory and 100 counts of involuntary manslaughter under the misdemeanor manslaughter theory.<
ACCEPTED 03-14-00510-CV 4243321 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS