Cases

In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo No. 07-23-00295-CV GEORGE R. CHAPMAN, APPELLANT V. MARY STOY JOHNSON, STEPHANIE BROOKE JOHNSON, LLC, AND STEPHANIE BROOKE JOHNSON-TURNER, APPELLEES On Appeal from the 222nd District Court

In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo No. 07-22-00158-CV GEORGE R. CHAPMAN, APPELLANT V. MARY STOY JOHNSON, STEPHANIE BROOKE JOHNSON, LLC, AND STEPHANIE BROOKE JOHNSON-TURNER, APPELLEES On Appeal from the 222nd District Court

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia ATLANTA, September 29, 2025 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A26D0079. QUANETIA JOHNSON CHAPMAN ET AL v. SFR XII ATL OWNER 4, L.P. . Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED. LC NUMBERS: 23106720 Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

In re Chapman, Walter; — Plaintiff(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writ; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “E”, No. 260-906. Denied on the showing made. MARCUS, J., not on panel.

327 F.Supp.2d 895 (2004) Linda JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. Cissy CHAPMAN, Lee Allison Ledbetter, Chris Rogers, Carlyn Nadeau, Judy Trigo, and United States of America, Defendants. No. 3:03-CV-3. United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, At Knoxville. July 22, 2004. *896 David H Dunaway, Law Office of David H. Dunaway & Associa

Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: Plaintiff appeals from a Special Term order dismissing his cause of action, brought under section 853 of the Real Property Actions and Proceedings Law, on the ground that said action is barred by the one-year Statute of Limitations (CPLR 215, subd. 3). Although plaintiff has attempted to express his cause of action in terms of a breach of contract, in fact and in law it is an action in tort for

AMY, Judge. hThe employee appeals the workers’ compensation judge’s determination that the employer demonstrated her ability to earn ninety percent of her pre-injury wage and that it proved the availability of suitable jobs. The employee specifically con*1024tests the workers’ compensation judge’s rejection of her assertion that the employer’s rehabilitation effort

207 S.W.3d 736 (2006) Cathy L. CHAPMAN, et al. v. Rick J. BEARFIELD. Supreme Court of Tennessee, at Knoxville. September 6, 2006 Session. November 6, 2006. *737 Jason W. Blackburn, Johnson City, Tennessee, for the appellant, Rick J. Bearfield. John J. Bandeian, Bristol, Tennessee, for the appellees, Cathy L. Chapman, Brand

FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS April 11, 2014 Elisabeth A. Shumaker FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT Clerk of Court VICKIE SCHMIDT PARSON; PATRICIA SCALES;

IN THE MISSOURI COURT OF APPEALS WESTERN DISTRICT DAVID L. JOHNSON, ) ) Appellant-Respondent, ) WD86006 )(Consolidated with WD86058) v. ) )OPINION FILED: ) June 25, 2024 MARIO USERA, ) ) Respondent-Appellant. )

342 F.Supp.2d 383 (2004) John J. CHAPMAN, Plaintiff, v. LORILLARD TOBACCO COMPANY, Defendant. Civil No. 1:03CV00586. United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina. October 20, 2004. *385 Angela Newell Gray, Gray Newell Johnson & Blackmon, LLP, Winston-Salem, NC, for Plaintiff. Natalie Kay Sanders, Nicole A. Crawfor

SUHRHEINRICH, Circuit Judge, concurring. I fully concur in the majority’s reasoning. I write separately to respond to the dissent. The dissent believes that the language of § 1981 is perfectly clear: “according to subsection (c), the rights protected by sub*430section (a), ie., the rights ‘to make and enforce contracts,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ___________________________________ ) LAMAR CHRISTOPHER CHAPMAN, III, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 25-0368 (UNA) ) JAMES C. DUFF, et al., )

Manish S. Shah, United States District Judge *1160Defendant's motion for reconsideration [318] is granted. STATEMENT Yahoo!'s PC2SMS service caused a text message to be sent to Rachel Johnson by pulling her number from a database of stored numbers-an address book-and then automatically sending that number a text messa

* * * * * * * * * * * The Full Commission has reviewed the prior Opinion and Award based upon the record of the proceedings before Deputy Commissioner Gillen and the briefs and arguments before the Full Commission. The appealing party has not shown good grounds to reconsider the evidence, receive further evidence or rehear the parties or their representatives. The Full Commission AFFIRMS with some modifications the Opinion and Award of the Deputy Com

In re Chapman, Everett; — Plaintiff/s); applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; Parish of Iberia, 16th Judicial District Court, Div. “G”, No. 80079; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. CA96-0977. Denied. JOHNSON, J., would grant the writ. KNOLL, J., not on panel.

CHUTICH, Justice. This case considers whether the medical treatment parameters established under the workers' compensation act apply to an employee's claim for reimbursement of medical expenses that the employer contends are not reasonably necessary. Minnesota Rule 5221.6020, subpart 2 (2017), states that the treatment parameters "do not apply to treatment of an injury after an insurer has denied liability for the injury." Relying o

702 A.2d 132 (1997) John CHAPMAN v. Andrew SPARTA, Green Mountain Tile Distributors and Bennington House of Tile, Inc. No. 96-474. Supreme Court of Vermont. September 19, 1997. *133 John E. Brady and Timothy B. Richards of Richards and Brady, P.C., Springfield, for plaintiff-appellant. James B. Grussing of Eaton & Haye

695 So.2d 1358 (1997) Everett CHAPMAN v. Franny L. POIRRIER, et al. No. 97-C-1164. Supreme Court of Louisiana. June 20, 1997. Denied. JOHNSON, J., would grant the writ. KNOLL, J., not on panel.