Cases

VOROS, Judge (concurring): 69 I concur in the majority opinion. Alternatively, I believe this appeal is inadequately briefed. T70 For example, perhaps the Mitchells most sympathetic claim is their claim for equitable estoppel, They assert that Bank Defendants induced them to miss monthly payments on the note and consequently should be estopped from foreclosing on the house based on thos

2014 UT App 244 _________________________________________________________ THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS JIM NEBEKER, Plaintiff, Appellee, and Cross-appellant, v. SUMMIT COUNTY, Defendant, Appellant, and Cross-appellee. Amended Opinion1 No. 20120269-CA Filed October 17, 2014 Third District

Memorandum Decision ROTH, Judge: ¶1 Michael J. Van Leeuwen appeals the district court’s dismissal of his complaint under rule 12(b)(6) of the Utah Rules of Civil Procedure. We reverse the district court’s dismissal order and remand for further proceedings. BACKGROUND 1

Opinion ORME, Judge: ¶ 1 Alexis Nelson (Mother), formerly known as Alexis Veysey, appeals the district court’s order denying her claim for daycare-expense arrearages. We affirm. ¶ 2 In 2013, Mother sought reimbursement from Andrew Veysey (Father) for daycare expenses that she incurred between 2002— over a decade earlier — and 2006. The commissioner denied her claim in substantial part,

Opinion DAVIS, Judge: 1 Alexis Veysey (Mother) challenges the district court's adoption of the domestic commissioner's recommendation regarding reimbursement of daycare expenses for the parties' children. We vacate the district court's order and remand for further proceedings. BACKGROUND T2 The parties divor

OPINION VOROS, Associate Presiding Judge: {1 Petitioner Michael R. Murray seeks review of a decision of the Appeals Board of the Labor Commission (the Board) denying his workers' compensation claim due to a lack of legal causation. We decline Murray's invitation to set aside the Board's decision. BACKGROUND

253 P.3d 1096 (2011) 2011 UT App 113 Jack W. PETERSON, Plaintiff, Appellee, and Cross-appellant, v. D. Scott JACKSON; Alan D. Allred; and Peterson Allred Jackson, P.C., Defendants, Appellants, and Cross-appellees. No. 20090710-CA. Court of Appeals of Utah. April 14, 2011. *1100 James C. Jenkins and Jeremy

25 F.Supp.2d 1245 (1998) Elroy TILLMAN, Petitioner, v. Gerald L. COOK, Warden, Utah State Prison and Jan Graham, Utah Attorney General, Respondents. No. 2:95-CV-731 B. United States District Court, D. Utah, Central Division. August 31, 1998. *1246 *1247 *1248

EVELYN V. KEYES, Justice, dissenting. The majority opinion misconceives and misapplies the standard of review of modification of conservatorship of a child. It affirms a clearly arbitrary and capricious trial court judgment that removed a fit mother as sole managing conservator of her child and appointed the father as primary conservator with the right to establish residency solely on the basis of a 12-year-old

Opinion issued October 26, 2006 In The Court of Appeals For The

In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana ______________________________ No. 06-08-00139-CV ______________________________ IN THE INTEREST OF S.A.E. AND M.B.E., CHILDREN On Appeal from the County Court at Law Bowie County, Texas Trial Court No. 05D1748-CCL Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Morriss

In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana ______________________________ No. 06-08-00139-CV