Cases

ORDER Thomas S. Zilly, United States District Judge THIS MATTER comes before the Court on defendant’s motion for partial summary judgment, docket no. 15, to dismiss plaintiffs claims for insurance bad faith and violation of Washington’s Insurance Fair Conduct Act-(“IFCA”) and Consumer Protection Act (“CPA”). Having reviewed the motion and all relevant filings, the Court enters the following Order.

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT John C. Coughenour, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This matter comes before the Court on Defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company’s motion for partial summary judgment (Dkt. No. 11). Having thoroughly considered the parties’ briefing and the relevant record, the Court finds oral argument unnecessary and hereby GRANTS the motion

76 F.Supp.2d 1069 (1999) Cindy CARLSON, Plaintiff, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE CO., a corporation, Defendant. No. CV-98-122-GF. United States District Court, D. Montana, Great Falls Division. November 22, 1999. *1070 *1071 Channing Hartelius, Hartelius, Ferguson, Baker & Kazd

Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest to Illinois Official Reports the accuracy and i

2022 WI 7 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2019AP1320 COMPLETE TITLE: Elliot Brey and Estate of Ryan B. Johnson, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Defendant-Respondent-Petitioner, Channing H. Mathews,

The summaries of the Colorado Court of Appeals published opinions constitute no part of the opinion of the division but have been prepared by the division for the convenience of the reader. The summaries may not be cited or relied upon as they are not the official language of the division. Any discrepancy between the language in the summary and in the opinion should be resolved in favor of the language in the opinion.

2020 WI App 45 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2019AP1320 †Petition for Review Filed Complete Title of Case: ELLIOT BREY AND ESTATE OF RYAN B. JOHNSON, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, V. STATE FARM MUTUAL A

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. ALICIA MEDINA, Appellee. No. 4D19-954 [July 1, 2020] Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Ca

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER MARK E. FULLER, District Judge. Before the Court are Defendants State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (“State Farm”) and Shane Anderson’s (“Anderson”) (collectively “Defendants”) Notice of Removal (Doc. # 1), State Farm’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. # 4), Anderson’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. # 5), Plaintiff Joseph Broadway’s (“Broadway”) Motion to Remand (Doc. # 7), and Def

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JANE J. BOYLE, District Judge. Before the Court are Plaintiffs’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (doc. 38), filed January 27, 2012, and Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (doc. 35), filed January 27, 2012. For the reasons stated below, Plaintiffs’ Motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part and Defendant’s Motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. <

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 1161 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 1162 OPINION This five-year-old dispute arises out of the cutting of a number of Leyland cypress trees on B

*1294ORDER LEIGH MARTIN MAY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This case comes before the Court on Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment [49]. After due consideration, the Court enters the following Order: I. BACKGROUND1 Defendant MegaMart hired Plaintiff Jung Chan Lee as its IT Man

Schindler, J. ¶1 Except as authorized in RCW 9.41.290, the legislature expressly preempts municipalities from enacting firearm regulations prohibiting the possession of firearms. The City of Seattle appeals the trial court’s determination that RCW 9.41.290 preempts the Seattle Department of Parks and Recreation from enacting a rule that prohibits the possession of firearms at designated city parks and park facilities open to the

265 P.3d 169 (2011) 164 Wash.App. 549 Winnie CHAN, an individual; Robert Kennar, an individual; Raymond Carter, an individual; Gray Peterson, an individual; Gary G. Goedecke, an individual, Respondents, The Second Amendment Foundation, Inc., a Washington non-profit corporation; Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms, a Washington non-profit corporation; Washington Arms Collectors, Inc., a Washington non-profit

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of an insurance policy, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Brandveen, J.), dated June 30, 2009, which granted the motion of the defendant Allstate Insurance Company for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it. Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

351 F.Supp.2d 1197 (2005) Laural L. CHAN, Plaintiff, v. SPRINT CORPORATION, Defendant. No. 03-2608-GTV. United States District Court, D. Kansas. January 11, 2005. *1198 *1199 Barry R. Grissom, Michael M. Shultz, Law Firm of Michael M. Shultz, P.A., Overland Park, KS, for Plaintiff. Davi

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS ══════════ No. 19-0280 ══════════ LOUIS HINOJOS, PETITIONER V. STATE FARM LLOYDS AND RAUL PULIDO, RESPONDENTS ══════════════════════════════════════════ ON PETITION FOR REVI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Martha I.O. Mogaji v. Civil No. 20-cv-249-JL Opinion No. 2022 DNH 126 Tom Chan, Rosa Chan, TRC Trust, Nan King Restaurant FINDINGS OF FACT AND RULINGS OF LAW AFTER BENCH TRIAL This commercial landlord-tenant case requires the court to determine whether the

995 P.2d 276 (2000) 196 Ariz. 234 Kimberly K. ZILISCH, a single person, Plaintiff-Appellant, Cross Appellee. v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, an Arizona corporation, Defendant-Appellee, Cross Appellant. No. CV-98-0535-PR. Supreme Court of Arizona, En Banc. March 3, 2000. *277 Thur & O

OPINION OF THE COURT Carol R. Edmead, J. In this class action suit alleging, inter alia, violations of the Labor Law, defendant Chinese-American Planning Council Home Attendant Program, Inc. moves pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (1), (5) and (7) to dismiss plaintiffs’ complaint or, in the alternative, to compel arbitration pursuant to CPLR 7503 (a). Plaintiffs (or class members) are current an