Cases

32 A.3d 351 (2011) James Robert SINNOTT, Catherine A. Pepper a/k/a Catherine Sinnott, Defendants Below, Appellants, v. Derrick THOMPSON, by his Guardian Ad Litem, Kelly M. Neville-Thompson, Plaintiff Below, Appellee. No. 319, 2011. Supreme Court of Delaware. Submitted: November 9, 2011. Decided: November 16, 2011. *352<

Graham, J. The mother and her older daughter, Amalie, appeal from a judgment granting permanent custody of Amalie to the Department of Social Services (department), and the mother appeals from a decree terminating the mother’s parental rights to her younger daughter, Elise. The mother and Amalie contend that the evidence was insufficient to support the judge’s finding that the mother is currently unfit. They also contend that the

Marshall, C.J. In this care and protection case, a judge in the Juvenile Court awarded temporary custody of a newborn infant to the Department of Children and Families (department) following a so-called “seventy-two hour hearing.” See G. L. c. 119, § 24. The infant, whom we shall call Zita, sought relief under G. L. c. 211, § 3, from a single justice of the county court, who denied her request. Zita appealed from the judgment of t

Kantrowitz, J. In this appeal, the significant issue is whether a Juvenile Court judge erred in admitting in evidence findings from a prior termination of parental rights decision (concerning three other children) in a subsequent termination of parental rights trial involving a newborn child. In the circumstances of this case, we find no error. *5201. <

ACCEPTED 13-14-00667-CV THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 4/17/20

Shvalb v Rubinshtein (2022 NY Slip Op 02827) Shvalb v Rubinshtein 2022 NY Slip Op 02827 Decided on April 27, 2022 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. <

Opinion LIU, J. Hartford Casualty Insurance Company (Hartford) issued a commercial general liability policy to Swift Distribution, Inc., doing business as Ultimate Support Systems (Ultimate), that covered “personal and advertising injury.” This term included claims arising from “[ojral, written, or electronic publication of material that slanders or libels a p

SUMMARY ORDER Finding no abuse of discretion in the District Court’s denial of appellants’ Rule 60(b) motion, we affirm the order of the District Court, for substantially the reasons stated by Judge Johnson in his Memorandum and Order, see Trowbridge v. Institute for Basic Research in Developmental Disabilities, 2003 WL 21143086 (E.D.N.Y. Mar.3, 2003). We also reject the request, made in appellants’ October 22, 2003 brief on

50 Cal.4th 1370 (2010) 118 Cal. Rptr. 3d 95 242 P.3d 1020 AMERON INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA et al., Defendants and Respondents. AMERON INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. HARBOR INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant and Respondent. No. S153852. Supreme Court o

DATO, J. *894Dr. Leah Levi, a neuro-ophthalmologist, appeals from a summary judgment in favor of her former employer, the Regents of the University of California (Regents), and Dr. Robert Weinreb, the chair of the department of ophthalmology at the University of California, San Diego (University). Levi asserted various causes of action against

Doerfer, J. The father of Leland, who was bom on January 4, 2000, appeals from a decree of the Juvenile Court finding him currently unfit to care for his son, awarding permanent custody to the Department of Social Services (DSS), terminating his parental rights, and adopting DSS’s permanency plan while denying the father’s petition for guardianship of the child. We agree with the father that the subsidiary findings taken togethe

[Cite as Risner v. Ohio Dept. of Transp., 2013-Ohio-5698.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT Paul Risner as Co-Administrator : of the Estate of Amber Risner, a Deceased Minor et al., : Plaintiffs-Appellants, : No. 12AP-828 (Ct. of Cl. No. 2011-033

Bridgewater, J. ¶1 David Frank appeals from the trial court’s order declaring that article VII, section 2 of Kenneth *313and Catherine Franks’1 wills, bequesting real property known as Cranberry Lake, to the Frank Family Foundation (Foundation), did not adeem. The court’s order declared that even if the estates acquired an interest in Cranber

38 Cal.Rptr.3d 716 (2006) 135 Cal.App.4th 958 FULLER-AUSTIN INSULATION COMPANY, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. HIGHLANDS INSURANCE COMPANY et al., Defendants and Appellants. No. B170079. Court of Appeal, Second District, Division Two. January 19, 2006. *720 Alschuler Grossman Stein & Kahan, Frank Kaplan,

[Cite as Michael v. Worthington City School Dist., 2020-Ohio-1134.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT Jay E. Michael, as Administrator of the : Estate of Franklin Clark, : Plaintiff-Appellant, No. 19AP-145 : (C.P.C. No. 18CV-1451)

776 F.Supp.2d 1101 (2011) Ted GAYLORD and Sheri Gaylord, as individuals and dba J & T Cattle Company, Plaintiffs, v. NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, an Ohio corporation, Amco Insurance Company, an Iowa corporation, Allied Group, Inc. an Iowa Corporation, and Does 1 through 100, Defendants. No. 1:10-CV-620 AWI MJS. United States District Court, E.D. California. March 4,

189 P.3d 834 (2008) In the Matter of the Estate of Kenneth FRANK, Deceased. In the Matter of the Estate of Catherine H. Frank, Deceased. David K. Frank and Patricia L. Frank, individually and as a martial community, and David K. Frank, as Personal Representative for the Estate of Kenneth and Catherine Frank, Appellants, v. Laurie McClanahan, individually and as part of her marital community; John A. Clees, individually and as part of his

103 Cal.Rptr.2d 672 (2001) 24 Cal.4th 945 16 P.3d 94 CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S OF LONDON et al., Petitioners, v. The SUPERIOR COURT of Los Angeles County, Respondent; Powerine Oil Company, Inc., et al., Real Parties in Interest. No. S084057. Supreme Court of California. February 1, 2001. Rehearing Denied

24 Mass. App. Ct. 391 (1987) 509 N.E.2d 300 COMMONWEALTH vs. ROLANDO MERCADO. Appeals Court of Massachusetts, Middlesex. April 14, 1987. June 26, 1987. Present: GRANT, KAPLAN, & WARNER, JJ. Suzanne Rudalevige for the defendant. *392 Catherine E. Sullivan, Assistant District

847 P.2d 722 (1993) Linda FRANCES, individually, and Linda Frances, as Guardian for David E. Frances and Joshua W. Frances, minor children, Appellant/Cross-Respondent, v. PLAZA PACIFIC EQUITIES, INC., A California Corporation, Respondent/Cross-Appellant. No. 22475. Supreme Court of Nevada. February 23, 1993. *723 C. Nicholas Pere