Cases

*407OPINION. Arundell: Petitioners argue that the total cost of canceling the leases was not deductible in the year of cancellation but should be spread over the 72%-month period during which the Pierce contract was effective. Similar treatment is also urged for the unamortized cost of certain improvements placed upon the relinquished leaseholds by petit

Petition for writ of certiorari to the .Court of Errors’ & Appeals of New Jersey denied.

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  No. 08-30125 Plaintiff-Appellee, v.  D.C. No. 4:05-cr-00167-SEH PATRICIA BETTERMAN PAUL, OPINION Defendant-Appellant.  Appeal fr

207 U.S. 187 (1907) PENNSYLVANIA COAL AND COKE COMPANY v. CASSATT. No. 284. Supreme Court of United States. Argued October 28, 29, 1907. Decided December 2, 1907. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. MR. CHIEF JUSTICE FULLER: For the reasons given in the preceding case the judgment is reversed, and the cause reman

Mr. Chief Justice Fuller, after making the foregoing statement, delivered the opinion of the court. The Pennsylvania Railroad Company did not except to the order nor attempt, to prosecute a writ of error therefrom if that were possible; the plaintiffs in error, who were officers of the company, excepted and carried the case up on this writ of error! They were not parties to the case between the Coal Company and

Petitions for writs of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit granted.'

Kalinowski v United Chair Co., Inc. (2019 NY Slip Op 04535) Kalinowski v United Chair Co., Inc. 2019 NY Slip Op 04535 Decided on June 7, 2019 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporti

Kun, J., This is a suit brought by bill in equity on behalf of the creditors and bondholders of the Bankers Joint Stock Land Bank of Milwaukee to enforce the stockholders’ liability under the provisions of section sixteen of the Federal Farm Loan Act. The Bankers Joint Stock Land Bank of Milwaukee is a corporation duly formed and organized under the provisions of the Federal Farm Loan Act of Congress of July

137 F.2d 745 (1943) CASSATT v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE. No. 8191. Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit. Argued March 18, 1943. Decided August 23, 1943. *746 Thomas Reath, of Philadelphia, Pa. (Calvin H. Rankin and Frederick E. S. Morrison, both of Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for petitioner.

Eldredge, J. The plaintiffs in the above-entitled cause filed their complaint to recover frolm the defendant an amount alleged to be due for certain purchases of stock made by the plaintiffs for the defendant. The complaint contains six counts. The first count alleges that the defendant ordered the plaintiffs to buy for the defendant one hundred shares of the common stock of Baldwin Locomotive Works, when issued, at a certain pr

Pee Ctieiam. The suit is brought to recover the purchase price of stock alleged to have been purchased by the defendant from the plaintiffs. The plaintiffs are a partnership whose principal office is in the city of Philadelphia and one of whom resides in the city of Camden. The defendant is a national banking association with its place of business in West New York, Hudson county, New Jersey. The suit was instituted in the Supr

207 U.S. 181 28 S.Ct. 108 52 L.Ed. 160 WEBSTER COAL & COKE COMPANY, Petitioner,v.A. J. CASSATT, John B. Thayer, Charles E. Pugh, et al. No. 283. Argued October 28, 29, 1907. Decided December 2, 1907. The Webster coal & Coke Company commenced an actio

Thompson, J., delivered the opinion of the court. The plaintiff filed as a claim in the probate court against the estate of Rudolph Bircher, deceased, in the hands of *324•John C. Vogel, his executor, the following promissory note:— “ $20,000. St. Louis, Mo., January 8, 1878. “ Five year

This is an appeal from a judgment of nonsuit in an action where the plaintiffs below, stock brokers, sought to recover from the defendant, a national bank, the purchase price and their commissions, in a transaction involving the purchase, by the plaintiffs, of one hundred shares of the common stock of the Baldwin Locomotive Works, *Page 537 when, as and if issued, and two hundred shares of the common stock of the Crocker-Wheeler Company, when, as and if i

151 F.2d 461 (1945) COLUMBIA GAS & ELECTRIC CORPORATION v. UNITED STATES et al. (three cases). Nos. 9775-9777. Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. October 9, 1945. As Amended on Petition for Rehearing November 26, 1945. Petition for Rehearing and Modification Denied January 21, 1946. *462

PER CURIAM. The appellant, in each of the above causes, petitions for rehearing and for modification of the order of the court entered November 26, 1945, 151 F.2d 461, whereby the direction for mandate in the final paragraph of the opinion rendered October 9, 1945, was amended to require that the decree be limited in remedy to the subordination of Columbia claims to the claims of creditors of every class.

Marx, J. (Orally.) I have considered the several objections that have been made tp the right of the plaintiff to continue this action. It is proper that these questions should be determined at the outset, and if it is clearly apparent at the very outset of the case that the plaintiff has no right to maintain his action, it should be so determined and' the proceedings stopped. First, as to the stock which

LURTON, Circuit Judge, after making the foregoing statement of facts, delivered the opinion of the court. The primal question which confronts the court arises upon the objection interposed by counsel for the plaintiff in error to a trial of the *940accused on account of Ms then nonsane mind and memory. The application was nominally for continuance, and t

TAFT, Circuit Judge (charging jury). We are nearing the end of a long trial. The strain upon all of v. has been great, but the burden has fallen most upon you, who, accustomed to active life in the open air, must have grown weary with the long days of the hearing. I congratulate you that your tedious service is drawing to a close, and I thank yon for the quiet patience and earnest attention which you have manifested.

OPINION OF THE COURT ALDISERT, Circuit Judge. This appeal by the government from an order of the district court, 321 F. Supp. 7, awarding $5,000 to attorney claimants from an escrow fund requires us to decide whether the claimants had perfected an attorney’s lien under Pennsylvania law and were, therefore, e