Cases

285 S.W.3d 242 (2008) John REEVE, Bill King, Pamela Barnum, Joyce Carpenter, Bill F. Smith, Jimmy Keeland, Kenneth Keeland, Rick Henderson, Kathleen A. Clark, Anne McGowan, Leola Yeager, Bobby Yeager, Ardith Ricketts, Randel Clarida, Bill Clarida, James Glisson, Jr., Niles Rains, and all other Carroll County Residents and Taxpayers Similarly Situated, Appellants, Cindy M. Baker, Rule 11 Appellant, v. CARROLL COUNTY, Arkansas; The Carroll Coun

BENAVIDES, Circuit Judge: The appellants challenge the lower court’s dismissal of their suit on several grounds. First, they dispute the court’s ruling that they failed to plead fraud with sufficient particularity. Second, they argue that the court abused its discretion in denying their motion for leave to amend. Third, they argue that the court dismissed several tort claims

POSNER, Circuit Judge. This litigation began in 2009, when CE Design filed a class action suit under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, 47 U.S.C. § 227, against King Supply, which removed the suit to the federal district court in Chicago. King Supply had been issued commercial general liability and commercial umbrella policies by three insurance companies, but upon its request for coverage they disclaimed any obligation

KITCHENS, Justice, for the Court: ¶ 1. The Jefferson Davis County Youth Court held J.P.,1 a minor, in a juvenile detention facility for 103 days, then in the Jefferson Davis County Jail for thirty days more when J.P. attained age eighteen. J.P. was never adjudicated delinquent. No hearing was held on the question of his delinquency. After more than four months in custody, h

Affirmed by published opinion. Chief Judge WILKINSON wrote the opinion, in which Judge DIANA GRIBBON MOTZ and Judge KING joined. OPINION WILKINSON, Chief Judge: Police Officer Eric Carroll filed this suit challenging his termination by the Westminster Police Department. The Westminster Chief of Police fired Carroll because of a p

164 P.3d 1190 (2007) 214 Or. App. 333 KING CITY REHAB, LLC dba King City Rehabilitation and Living Center, dba King City Rehab Specialty Care, an Oregon limited liability company, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CLACKAMAS COUNTY, a political subdivision, Defendant, and Brian Anderson, Bruce Anderson, Karen Carroll, Kathy Crayne, Dennis Hicks, John Jensen, Nathan Silvola, Geraldine Stanley, Sharon Bighill, and Irene Shuler, bei

651 A.2d 297 (1994) Herbert MENDEL, individually and on behalf of a class of shareholders of Katy Industries, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. Wallace E. CARROLL, et al., Defendants. PENSLER CAPITAL PARTNERS, I.L.P., a Delaware limited partnership, and Pensler Capital Corporation, a Delaware corporation, Plaintiffs, v. KATY INDUSTRIES, INC., a Delaware corporation, Wallace E. Carroll, Jr., et al., Defendants. Civ. A. Nos. 13

PER CURIAM. Rebecca Carroll appeals from an order issuing a writ of restitution in favor of Darrell and Joan Purdy in an eviction action. We ordered the parties to submit memoranda addressing whether we had jurisdiction of the appeal since Carroll's counterclaim for damages remained pending before the trial court. An appeal as of right to the court of appeals generally may be taken only from a final judgment o

2023 IL 128468 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS (Docket No. 128468) JAMIE LICHTER, Appellee, v. KIMBERLY PORTER CARROLL, as Special Administrator of the Estate of Donald Christopher, Deceased, Appellant. Opinion fi

118 S.W.3d 742 (2003) KING RANCH, INC., et al. v. William Warren CHAPMAN, III, et al. No. 01-0430. Supreme Court of Texas. Argued April 2, 2003. Decided August 28, 2003. Rehearing Denied November 21, 2003. *745 Howard P. Newton, San Antonio, James H. Robichaux, Corpus Christi, Matthews & Bran

THOMAS, J., for the Court: ¶ 1. R.L.S., the natural father, appeals the lower court’s denial of custody modification which preserved custody of the child, D.K.S., with A.R.S., the natural mother. I. THE CHANCELLOR MANIFESTLY ERRED BY DENYING CUSTODY MODIFICATION CONTRARY TO THE OVERWHELMING WEIGHT'OF THE EVIDENCE. Finding error, we reverse and render. Although this

Dismissed by published opinion. Judge WIDENER wrote the opinion in which Judge KING and Senior Judge HAMILTON joined. *346 OPINION WIDENER, Circuit Judge. Fred Horne (defendant) challenges the district court’s order denying his motion for summary judgment a

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Daniel B. Carroll appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion to alter the district court’s judgment granting Vinnell Arabia, LLC’s motion to dismiss his complaint raising claims under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2012), and 42 U.S.C. § 1981

OPINION VIGIL, Judge. Defendant Thaddeus Carroll was convicted of driving while under the influence (DWI) in violation of NMSA 1978, Section 66-8-102(D) (2007, amended 2010), following a bench trial in metropolitan court. Defendant appealed to the district court for on-record review, and the district court affirmed. Defendant then appealed to this Court. The State has f

On June 27, 2007, the Cherokee County Department of Human Resources ("DHR") filed a petition to terminate the parental rights of A.R. ("the mother") and D.B. ("the father") to their son, A.L.B., and their daughter, K.M.B. DHR concurrently petitioned to terminate the mother's parental rights to another son, C.D.B.; the identity of C.D.B.'s father has never been confirmed or adjudicated. The juvenile court ("the trial court") received ore tenus evidence at a hearing on the termination p

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS THE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT MEANS, District Judge. Pending before the Court is the defendants’ Consolidated Motion To Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint, filed April 12, 2004. Having carefully considered the motion, response, and reply, the Court concludes that the motion should be GRANTED. On June 6, 2001, Paul King filed his

759 F.Supp.2d 1064 (2010) Ralph REEDER, M.D., Plaintiff, v. Thomas CARROLL, M.D., Defendant. No. 09-CV-4013-LRR. United States District Court, N.D. Iowa, Western Division. December 21, 2010. *1067 Charles T. Patterson, Patterson & Prahl, L.L.P., Custer, SD, Jeffrey C. Clark, Julie Ann Sullivan, McGuire Woods, LLP, Chicago, IL

*** FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST’S HAWAIʻI REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER *** Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX 24-JAN-2020 07:46 AM IN THE S

In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana _______________________________ 06-19-00261-CR _______________________________ THOMAS PAUL CARROLL, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 115th District Court Upshur County, Texas Trial Court No. 18310 Before Morriss, C.J., Burgess an

828 N.E.2d 1155 (2005) 215 Ill.2d 1 293 Ill.Dec. 657 Willard J. KING, Jr., et al., Appellants, v. FIRST CAPITAL FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION, d/b/a FCF Funding, Appellee. Ricky Jenkins et al., Appellants, v. Concorde Acceptance Corporation et al., Appellees. Nos. 97263, 97761. Supreme Court of Illinois. April 21, 200