Cases

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4752-17 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION September 16, 2021 DWAYNE D. BOSTON,

462 F.Supp.2d 601 (2006) Leonard CARMICHAEL, Plaintiff, v. PENNSAUKEN TOWNSHIP BOARD OF EDUCATION, et al., Defendants. Civil No. 05-0513 (RMB). United States District Court, D. New Jersey, Camden Vicinage. November 27, 2006. *602 *603 *604 David A. Gies, Es

OPINION Mark R. Hornak, United States District Judge In late December, 2013, Derek A. Thomas was arrested and brought to Fayette *362County Prison (“Prison”).1 Mr, Thomas was screened for suicide risk and other medical conditions by Correctional Officer Joseph Barnes and, later that evening, by Prison Nurse Shannon DeLo

7 A.3d 961 (2010) Mark RIVERA, Defendant Below, Appellant, v. STATE of Delaware, Plaintiff Below, Appellee. No. 111, 2010. Supreme Court of Delaware. Submitted: September 8, 2010. Decided: November 10, 2010. *963 Ronald G. Poliquin, Esquire, of Chasanov, Schaeffer & Poliquin, Dover, Delaware, for Appellant.</

*356 Chief Justice RAJBNER delivered the opinion of the Court. This case raises a novel question about the constitutionality of the roving wiretap provision of the State’s wiretap law. As a general rule, law enforcement officials must follow a strict set of procedures and get court ap

USCA4 Appeal: 22-1927 Doc: 119 Filed: 04/29/2024 Pg: 1 of 147 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 22-1721 MAXWELL KADEL; JASON FLECK; CONNOR THONEN-FLECK; JULIA MCKEOWN; MICHAEL D. BUNTING, JR.; C.B., by his next friends and parents; SAM

Judge LIVINGSTON concurs in part and dissents in part in a separate opinion. POOLER, Circuit Judge: Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Joanna Seybert, /.) judgment in favor of plaintiffs-appellees John Restivo and Dennis Halstead following a jury trial. Defendant-appellant Carolann Hessemann, as executrix of the Estate of Joseph Volpe, (“Volpe”) challenges the d

USCA4 Appeal: 22-1721 Doc: 130 Filed: 04/29/2024 Pg: 1 of 147 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 22-1721 MAXWELL KADEL; JASON FLECK; CONNOR THONEN-FLECK; JULIA MCKEOWN; MICHAEL D. BUNTING, JR.; C.B., by his next friends and parents; SAM

14-4662 Restivo v. Hessemann 14‐4662‐cv Restivo v. Hessemann 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 2 FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT 3 ____________________ 4 5 August Term, 2015 6 7 (Argued: April 5, 2016 Decided: January 19, 2017)

770 A.2d 741 (2001) AFFILIATED FM INSURANCE COMPANY; Allendale Mutual Insurance Company; American Modern Home Insurance Company; Arkwright Mutual Insurance Company; Calvert Insurance Company; Cambridge Mutual Fire Insurance Company; Merrimack Mutual Fire Insurance Company; Bay State Insurance Company; Chester County Mutual Insurance Company; Chrysler Insurance Company; The Church Insurance Company; Cumberland Insurance Company, Inc.; Cumberland Mutual Fi

29 A.3d 475 (2011) 422 Md. 111 Timothy A. FREY, et al. v. COMPTROLLER OF the TREASURY. No. 62, September Term, 2009. Court of Appeals of Maryland. September 29, 2011. *481 Harry D. Shapiro (Seth J. Groman of Saul Ewing LLP, Baltimore, MD), on brief, for petitioners/cross-respondents. John K. Barry,

765 So.2d 197 (2000) Stanley REINISH and Carol Reinish, Appellants, v. John K. CLARK, in his official capacity as Tax Collector of Palm Beach County and as representative of other county tax collectors in the State of Florida; Gary Nikolits, in his official capacity as Property Appraiser of Palm Beach County; and L.H. Fuchs, in his official capacity as Executive Director of Florida Department of Revenue, Appellees. No. 1D98-

JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR., UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE A pipeline operator challenges a local ordinance prohibiting loading crude oil onto tankers and new structures for that purpose on the grounds that it is preempted under numerous federal and state laws, that it violates the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution, that it violates the business's civil rights, its due process rights, its right to avoid improper delegation,

208 F.Supp.2d 470 (2002) Joseph M. YARCHAK, Plaintiff, v. TREK BICYCLE CORPORATION, Vetta U.S.A. Limited, Selle Italia, S.R.L., and Brunswick Corp., Defendants. CIVIL ACTION NO. 00-5540(JEI). United States District Court, D. New Jersey. June 25, 2002. *471 *472 *4

888 A.2d 526 (2005) 382 N.J. Super. 284 NEW JERSEY STATE BAR ASSOCIATION, a not-for-profit corporation, and Peggy Sheahan Knee, individually Plaintiffs, v. STATE of New Jersey, John E. McCormac, in his official capacity as Treasurer of the State of New Jersey; Holly C. Bakke, in her official capacity as Commissioner of the Department of Banking and Insurance; and Fred M. Jacobs, M.D., in his official capacity as Acting Com

610 F.Supp. 715 (1985) Dennis A. WALTERS, Jr., Plaintiff, v. CITY OF ATLANTA; Andrew J. Young, individually and in his official capacity as Mayor, City of Atlanta; Shirley C. Franklin, individually and in her official capacity as the Chief Administrative Officer to the Mayor; Clara H. Axam, individually and in her capacity as Commissioner, Department of Administrative Services, City of Atlanta; Geraldine H. Elder, individually and in her official

Under this writ we are asked to review the adjudication of Judge Stein, sitting as a special statutory tribunal, wherein he directed that the conviction of defendant Carmichael for violation of an ordinance of the town of Westfield be set aside and for nothing holden. There are several acts providing for such review, but it is sufficient to cite the act of 1908 (Pamph. L.,p. 442) reprinted in Comp. Stat. (at p. 1868), as pl. 145 b. The last sentenc

141 N.J. Super. 177 (1976) 357 A.2d 772 HARRY BONNET ET AL., PLAINTIFFS, v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY, ET AL., DEFENDANTS. Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division. Decided February 11, 1976. *189 Mr. William L. Brach for plaintiffs (Messrs. Brach, Eichler, Rosenberg & Silver, attorneys; Mr. William H. Eat

ACCEPTED 03-14-00197-CV 4929353 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEX

341 U.S. 341 (1951) ALABAMA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION ET AL. v. SOUTHERN RAILWAY CO. No. 395. Supreme Court of United States. Argued February 27-28, 1951. Decided May 21, 1951. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA. *342 By special leave of Court, Merton Roland Nachman