Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “CARMEN FLORES”
Carmen Flores Castro v. Bertha Hernandez Renteriapublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT CARMEN FLORES CASTRO, No. 19-16048 Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 2:18-cv-01739- GMN-CWH BERTHA HERNANDEZ RENTERIA, Respondent-Appellee. OPINION
Del Carmen Flores v. Summit Hotel Grouppublic domain
492 F.Supp.2d 640 (2006) Maria DEL CARMEN FLORES et al., Plaintiffs, v. SUMMIT HOTEL GROUP et al., Defendants. No. EP-06-CA-256-PRM. United States District Court, W.D. Texas, El Paso Division. September 19, 2006. *641 *642 John A. Wenke, Attorney at Law, El Paso, TX, for Plaintiffs. Cha
Flores Castro v. Renteriapublic domain
Gloria M. Navarro, Chief Judge Pending before the Court is Respondent Bertha Hernandez Renteria's ("Respondent's") Objection, (ECF No. 55), to the Honorable Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman's November 2, 2018 Report and Recommendation ("First R&R"), (ECF No. 35). Petitioner filed a Response, (ECF No. 57). Also pending before the Court is Respondent's Objection, (ECF No. 60), to Judge Hoffman's November 29, 2018
Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL X BANCO POPULAR DE CERTIORARI PUERTO RICO procedente del Tribunal de Primera Demandante-Peticionario KLCE202400830 Instancia, Sala Superior de San v.
Saint Martin's University v. Florespublic domain
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Thur-ston County, No. 14-2-00021-6, Gary R. Tabor, J., entered August 21, 2015. Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded by unpublished opinion per Worswick, J., concurred in by Maxa, A.C.J., and Melnick, J.
United States v. Florespublic domain
PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Oscar Flores has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Flores has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of th
Flores v. SAIF Corp.public domain
PER CURIAM Affirmed. Carreon v. Commerce & Industry Ins. Co., 233 Or App 440, 226 P3d 73 (2010).
United States v. Meza-Florespublic domain
PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose Luis Meza-Flores has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Meza-Flores has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the re
United States v. Flores-Fangpublic domain
PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Fernando Arturo Flores-Fang has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Flores-Fang has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant po
United States v. Flores-Tamayopublic domain
PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Fausto Flores-Tamayo has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Flores-Tamayo has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant p
Ex parte Florespublic domain
OPINION J. Brett Busby, Justice Appellant Marcos Flores was charged with the offense of unlawfully carrying a handgun in a vehicle as a member of a criminal street gang. See Tex. Pen. Code Ann. §§ 46.02(a-l)(2)(C), 71.01(d) (West Supp.2014). Appellant filed pre-trial applications for writ of habeas corpus challenging the constitutionality of the statute. After a hearing, the trial court issued an o
United States v. Adam Florespublic domain
PER CURIAM: Defendant Adam Alfredo Flores appeals the district court's determination that he *683 was subject to an enhanced mandatory minimum sentence of fifteen years under the Armed Career Criminal Act (ACCA),
United States v. Luis Rocha Florespublic domain
PER CURIAM: Luis Javier Rocha Flores contends that Texas assault of a public servant is not an "aggravated felony" under 8 U.S.C. § 1326 (b)(2), because it is not a "crime of violence." See
United States v. Jose Florespublic domain
CARL E. STEWART, Chief Judge: Jose Ricardo Flores appeals his sentences for illegal reentry into the United States and violating a condition of his supervised release. He contends that the district court, which incorrectly believed that it lacked the authority to run the sentences concurrently, erred by imposing consecu
RRW Realty Corp. v. Florespublic domain
OPINION OF THE COURT George M. Heymann, J. Petitioners commenced these holdover proceedings pursuant to RPAPL 711 (5) and 715 and section 231 of the Real Property Law on the ground that illegal drug-related activity occurred on the premises known as 1806 Vyse Avenue, Bronx, New York. The three cases were consolidated for trial purposes in that the subject premises as well as the neighb
United States v. Jorge Ponce-Florespublic domain
JENNIFER WALKER ELROD, Circuit Judge: Jorge Enrique Ponce-Flores pleaded guilty to being unlawfully present in the United States after removal following his conviction for an aggravated felony. On appeal, he contends that the district court plainly erred when it applied an enhancement based on Ponce-Flores's aggregate sentence. We AFFIRM. I. J
Flores v. Gonzalespublic domain
MEMORANDUM ** This is a petition for review from the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order adopting and affirming an Immigration Judge’s order denying petitioners’ applications for cancellation of removal. We have reviewed the response to the court’s April 16, 2007 order to show cause and respondent’s motion to dismiss in part and for summary affirmance in part, and we conclude that
Jesse Flores and Carmen Flores v. United Statespublic domain
PER CURIAM. On January 24, 1956, Jesse Flores was tried and convicted, on six counts, of violating various provisions of the narcotics and conspiracy laws of the United States. His wife, Carmen, was at the same time convicted on four such counts. Jesse was sentenced to ten years imprisonment and one dollar fine on each count. His terms of imprisonment were so arranged, as to con
Figueroa-Flores v. Acevedo-Vilapublic domain
606 F.Supp.2d 212 (2009) Carmen FIGUEROA-FLORES, Plaintiff v. Hon. Anibal ACEVEDO-VILA, et al., Defendants. Civil No. 06-1939 (SEC). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. March 31, 2009. *213 Judith Berkan, Mary Jo Mendez-Vilella, Berkan & Mendez, San Juan, PR, for Plaintiff. Anabelle Quinones-Rodriguez, Depart
Figueroa-Flores v. Acevedo-Vilápublic domain
491 F.Supp.2d 214 (2007) Carmen FIGUEROA-FLORES, Plaintiff v. Hon. Anibal ACEVEDO-VILA, et al., Defendants. Civil No. 06-1939 (SEC). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. June 4, 2007. *215 *216 *217 Carlos Rodriguez-Garcia, San Juan, PR, for Plaint