Cases

Justice Pearce, opinion of the Court: INTRODUCTION ¶ 1 In 2003, L + C Unlimited Corporation (L + C) was assigned the lease that permitted the Golden Isle Restaurant to operate in a strip mall in Murray, Utah. Xiao-Yan Cao, L + C's president, personally guaranteed L + C's performance. In 2006, the lease was again assigned, this time to Hong G.

SUMMARY ORDER Petitioner Jian Xin Cao, a native and citizen of the People’s Republic of China, seeks review of a March 6, 2008 order of the BIA denying his motion to reopen. In re Jian Xin Cao, No. A78 411 918 (B.I.A. Mar. 6, 2008). We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts and procedural history in this case. We review the agency’s denial of a motion to reopen for abuse of di

915 So.2d 851 (2005) Duong CAO v. Richard L. STALDER, Secretary, Department of Public Safety and Corrections. No. 2004 CA 0650. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit. May 6, 2005. *852 Duong Cao, Plaintiff-Appellant In Proper Person. L. Bruce Dodd, Clinton, for Defendant-Appellee Richard Stalder, Secretary, Departmen

881 So.2d 1277 (2004) Cindy Phuong Cao and Kevin Khan CAO v. Dr. Randall Mark SCHAFFER and Dr. Diem Duy Do. No. 04-CA-242. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fifth Circuit. August 31, 2004. *1278 Bolen, Parker & Brenner, LTD, James A. Bolen, Jr., Donna J. Duplechian, Alexandria, LA, for Appellants. Wessel & Associates,

688 F.Supp.2d 498 (2010) ANH "Joseph" CAO, Republican National Committee, and Republican Party of Louisiana v. FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION. Civil Action No. 08-4887. United States District Court, E.D. Louisiana. January 27, 2010. *500 Joseph F. Lavigne, Thomas P. Hubert, Jones Walker, New Orleans, LA, James Bopp, Jr., Kaylan Lytl

SUMMARY ORDER Petitioner Jian Xin Cao, a native and citizen of the People’s Republic of China, seeks review of a March 6, 2008 order of the BIA denying his motion to reopen. In re Jian Xin Cao, No. A78 411 918 (B.I.A. Mar. 6, 2008). We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts and procedural history in this case. We review the agency’s denial of a motion to reopen for abuse of di

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 05-1524 ___________ Hong Zhang Cao, * * Petitioner, * * Petition for Review of an Order v. * of the Board of Immigration App

Motion for Rehearing Granted in Part and Denied in Part; Opinion of November 30, 2017, Withdrawn; Affirmed in Part, Reversed and Rendered in Part, Reversed and Remanded in Part, and Substitute Opinion filed March 8, 2018. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-16-00839-CV RICHARD NUGENT AND CAO, INC., Appellants V. THE ESTATE OF JA

POOLER, Circuit Judge. Cao He Lin petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) affirming, without opinion, an order from an Immigration Judge (“IJ”) denying Cao asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the U.N. Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). As in many such cases, the pivotal issue is petitioner’s credibility, an issue that the IJ det

In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-21-00017-CV ___________________________ MEDICAL RX SERVICES LLC; REMCO PHARMACY, INC.; PHARMACEUTICAL DEVELOPMENT GROUP, LLC D/B/A RX-DIRECT HOME DELIVERY; WESTLAKE HEALTH & BEAUTY PRODUCTS D/B/A WESTLAKE HEALTH MART PHARMACY; AND TM PHARMACY SERVICE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE March 11, 2009 Session CAO HOLDINGS, INC. v. LOREN L. CHUMLEY, COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE, STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Chancery Court for Davidson County No. 06-719-II Carol L. McCoy, Chancellor No. M2008-01679-COA-R3-CV - Filed May 27, 2009 Commissioner of Revenue assessed a

MELLOY, Circuit Judge. Hong Zhang Cao (“Cao”) seeks review of a final order of removal by the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”). The BIA summarily affirmed, without separate opinion, the decision of an immigration judge (“IJ”) denying Cao’s applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We affirm the judgment of t

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE March 11, 2009 Session CAO HOLDINGS, INC. v. LOREN L. CHUMLEY, COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE, STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Chancery Court for Davidson County No. 06-719-II Carol L. McCoy, Chancellor No. M2008-01679-COA-R3-CV - Filed May 27, 2009 FRANK G. CLEMENT , JR., J., dissen

Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL XI JUAN J. RIGAU APELACIÓN SEPÚLVEDA h/n/c JUAN Procedente del J. RIGAU & ASSOCIATES; Tribunal de Primera JUAN J. RIGAU & Instancia, Sala ASSOCIATES, INC. Caso Núm

Matter of Attorneys Inviolation of Judiciary Law § 468-a (2024 NY Slip Op 04648) Matter of Attorneys Inviolation of Judiciary Law § 468-a 2024 NY Slip Op 04648 Decided on September 26, 2024 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by

Opinion filed July 21, 2022 In The Eleventh Court of Appeals __________ No. 11-20-00181-CV __________ JAY SCHAUBLE A/K/A JUAN SCHAUBLE, Appellant V. MATTHEW SCHAUBLE, IN HIS CAPACITY AS TRUSTEE OF THE EDWARD R. SCHAUBLE TRUST, Appellee On Appeal from the Probate Court No. 2

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Green Analytics North, LLC d/b/a : Steep Hill PA, Hanging Gardens, LLC, : Pennsylvania Medical Solutions, LLC, : Curaleaf PA, LLC, AES Compassionate : Care, LLC, Standard Farms, LLC, and : Parea BioSciences, LLC, : Petitioners : : v. :

Cite as 2020 Ark. 51 Digitally signed by Susan P. Williams SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS Reason: I attest to the No. CV-19-416 accuracy and integrity of this document Opinion Delivered: February 6, 2020 Date: 2020-12-14 11:52:06 LANINA WATSON, APPEAL FROM THE MISSISSIPPI INDIVIDUALLY

Opinion issued August 30, 2024 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-23-00422-CV ——————————— PENTAIR RESIDENTIAL FILTRATION, LLC, Appellant V. PAUL BELSOME, III D/B/A BELSOME H2O INSTALLERS, ARUN ADAT, MAHESH ADI, SHARIF

OPINION McKEAGUE, Circuit Judge. Congress and the Supreme Court have made it abundantly clear that the aim of 42 U.S.C. § 1988 “is not for the purpose of aiding lawyers. The purpose of th[e] bill is to aid civil rights.” 122 Cong. Rec. 33,314 (Sept. 29, 1976) (remarks of Sen. Kennedy); Farrar v. Hobby, 506 U.S. 103, 115, 113 S.Ct. 566, 1