Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
4 opinions for “CALIFORNIA SPORTFISHING PROTECTION ALLIANCE v. PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY”
California Trout v. Fercpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT CALIFORNIA TROUT, Petitioner, No. 07-73664 v. FERC Project No. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY 2426-204 COMMISSION, Respondent. CALIFORNIA TROUT,
572 F.3d 1003 (2009) CALIFORNIA TROUT, Petitioner, v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, Respondent. California Trout, Petitioner, v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Respondent. Friends of the River, Petitioner, v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Respondent. Nos. 07-73664, 07-74494, 08-71593. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Tri-Realty Co. v. Ursinus Collegepublic domain
OPINION PRATTER, United States District Judge Tri-Realty Company (“Tri-Realty”) sued Ursinus College (“Ursinus”), alleging that the continuing effects of No. 6 fuel oil discharged from underground storage tanks (“USTs”) on Ursinus’s property violate the Resource Conservation Restoration Act (“RCRA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 6901-6992k, the Clean Water Act (“CWA”), 38 U.S.C. §§ 1251-1387, and several state laws. Ursinus
791 F.Supp.2d 719 (2011) SAN FRANCISCO BAYKEEPER, Plaintiff, v. WEST BAY SANITARY DISTRICT, Defendant. Case No. C-09-5676 EMC. United States District Court, N.D. California. May 23, 2011. *725 Daniel Cooper, Samantha Sue Williams, Lawyers for Clean Water, Christopher Alan Sproul, Environmental Advocates, Drevet J. Hunt, Attorney