Cases

Opinion of the Court by POLLACK, J. This case concerns the decision of the Department of Environmental Services of the City and County of Honolulu to discontinue frontloader collection services to 181 multi-unit residential buildings and nonprofit organizations. We address whether the elimination of these government services is prohibited by constituti

OPINION GOURLEY, District Judge: This is a negligence action in which jurisdiction is founded upon diversity of citizenship. The action arises out of an accident occurring in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, on July 30, 1968, wherein the automobile which plaintiff was driving collided with a tractor-trailer. The immediate matter before the Court is a Motion for Summary Judgment filed by original defendant Wilson Freig

Order entered December 20, 2018 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-18-00650-CV KEVIN HINDS, Appellant V. KELLY BETH CAIDWELL, ZACHARY ADAM ALLEN, TRINA T. WILSON AND ASSOCIATES, TRINA T. WILSON, GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEE INSURANCE

DISMISSED; Opinion Filed March 4, 2019. In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-18-00650-CV KEVIN HINDS, Appellant V. KELLY BETH CALDWELL, ZACHARY ADAM ALLEN, TRINA T. WILSON AND ASSOCIATES, TRINA T. WILSON, GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEE INSURANCE COMPANY, AND S

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs June 8, 2012 JEREMY D. CALDWELL v. LINDA NEAL AS CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT, WILSON COUNTY, TENNESSEE Appeal from the Circuit Court for Wilson County No. 2009CV1935 John D. Wooten, Jr., Judge No. M2011-02228-COA-R3-CV - Filed August 16, 2012 Plaintiff appea

ISHEE, J., for the Court: ¶ i. In January 2012, seven years after Maggie Atwood Caldwell and Thomas Atwood’s divorce, they filed a joint petition to modify their child-custody and child-support agreement pertaining to their daughter, Gracie. The Itawamba County Chancery Court granted the request. In 2013, Atwood filed a complaint against Caldwell for contem

OPINION OF THE COURT Pigott, J. At issue on this appeal is whether the testimony of a subpoenaed fact witness, who receives a fee alleged to be disproportionately in excess of CPLR 8001 (a)’s mandatory fee requirement for attendance at trial, is inadmissible as a matter of law. We conclude that such testimony is generally admissible, but that the trial court should, in a proper case, charge the jury as to th

OPINION OF THE COURT Skelos, J.P. A party who calls a witness to testify to facts within his or her knowledge is required by statute to pay that witness, inter alia, $15 for every day of his or her attendance at trial (see CPLR 8001). The question presented on this appeal is whether payment voluntarily made to a fact witness, far in excess of that mandatory witness fee, rendered the witness’s testimony

159 S.W.3d 695 (2004) Zulema ROSA, Individually and as Next Friend of Miguel Rosa, A Minor, Appellant, v. Richard D. CALDWELL, M.D., Childress Regional Medical Center, D. Barfield, R.N. and Perry Foster, R.N./F.N.P., Appellees. No. 07-02-0346-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Amarillo. June 30, 2004. Rehearing Overruled September 13, 2004.

ORDER PER CURIAM. AND NOW, this 29th day of September, 2010, the Order of the Commonwealth Court is AFFIRMED. Appellant’s complaint is remanded to the Court of Common Pleas of Fayette County. See Hill v. Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection, 545 Pa. 38, 679 A.2d 773, 774 n. 1 (1996).

614 F.3d 172 (2010) S&M BRANDS, INC.; Tobacco Discount House # 1, Inc.; Mark Heacock, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. James D. "Buddy" CALDWELL, in his official capacity as Attorney General State of Louisiana, Defendant-Appellee. No. 09-30985. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. August 10, 2010. *173 Hans Frank Bader, Sa

ORDER PER CURIAM. AND NOW, this 29th day of September, 2010, the Order of the Commonwealth Court is AFFIRMED. Appellant’s complaint is remanded to the Court of Common Pleas of Fayette County. See Hill v. Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection, 545 Pa. 38, 679 A.2d 773, 774 n. 1 (1996).

NEWSOM, Circuit Judge: This case arises out of the foreclosure of a home-equity conversion mortgage-commonly called a "reverse mortgage." We are asked to interpret a federal statute, 12 U.S.C. § 1715z-20, which authorizes the Secretary of the Department of Housing and Urban Development to establish a mortgage-insurance program designed to encourage lenders to offer reverse mortgages and

692 S.E.2d 885 (2010) PAY TEL COMMUNICATIONS, INC., Plaintiff v. CALDWELL COUNTY and Sheriff of Caldwell County, Defendants. No. COA09-935. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. May 4, 2010. *886 Tuggle Duggins & Meschan, P.A., by Kenneth J. Gumbiner and Martha R. Sacrinty, Greensboro, for plaintiff-appellant. Wilson, La

MEMORANDUM * The judgments of the district court in these consolidated appeals are AFFIRMED for substantially the reasons set forth in the district court’s written decision. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

EDWIN A. LOMBARD, Judge. | ,011 appeal the defendant, Tyrone A. Wilson, challenges the sufficiency of the evidence supporting his conviction for armed robbery in violation of La. Rev.Stat. 14:641 and aggravated rape in violation of La. Rev.Stat. 14:422. After review of the record in light of the applicable law and arguments of the party, we affirm the defendant’s co

Donovan, Presiding Judge. {¶ 1} This matter is before the court on the notice of appeal of Roy Howard, filed June 18, 2009. Howard appeals from the trial court’s adoption of a magistrate’s decision denying his petition for a civil protection order. {¶ 2} Howard sought the protection order in October 2008 against Kevin Wilson. Howard is married to Wilson’s ex-wife, Cassandra Howard, and they live in West C

Appeal dismissed by appellant.

PER CURIAM. We have for review a decision certifying the following question to be of great public importance: DOES THE DECISION IN [CONEY V. STATE,] 653 So.2d 1009 (Fla.1995), APPLY TO “PIPELINE CASES,” THAT IS, THOSE OF SIMILARLY SITUATED DEFENDANTS WHOSE CASES WERE PENDING ON DIRECT REVIEW OR NOT YET FINAL DURING THE TIME [CONEY] WAS UNDER CONSIDERATION BUT PRIOR TO THE ISS

HANS J. LILJEBERG, Judge. |2Pefendants, Metropolitan Development Center and the State of Louisiana, appeal the worker’s compensation court’s judgment dated February 27, 2012, in favor of claimant, Geraldyn Wilson. For the following reasons, we reverse and vacate the judgment. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY On February 19, 2005, claimant was employed by Metropolitan Development