Cases

678 F.Supp.2d 961 (2008) Eneida AMPARAN, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. PLAZA HOME MORTGAGE, INC.; Washington Mutual Mortgage Securities Corp., Defendants. Case No. C 07-4498 JF (RS). United States District Court, N.D. California, San Jose Division. December 17, 2008. *965 David M. Arbogast

USCA4 Appeal: 22-1660 Doc: 81 Filed: 01/23/2024 Pg: 1 of 17 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 22-1660 JOSE DAGOBERTO REYES; ROSY GIRON DE REYES; FELIX ALEXIS BOLANOS; RUTH RIVAS; YOVANA JALDIN SOLIS; ESTEBAN RUBEN MOYA YRAPURA; ROSA ELENA AMA

ORDER AFFIRMING BANKRUPTCY COURT RICHARD SEEBORG, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION Defendant-appellant William F. Garlock appeals the Bankruptcy Court’s judgment for appellees and the order denying his motion to amend that judgment. For the reasons that follow, both decisions are affirmed. II. BACKGROUND In September 2007, plaintiff-a

STEPHEN A. HIGGINSON, Circuit Judge: This appeal requires us to consider the United States Fish and Wildlife Service’s inclusion of private land in a critical-habitat designation under the Endangered Species Act. Misconceptions exist about how critical-habitat designations impact private property. Critical-habitat designations do not transform private land into wildlife refuges. A designation does not authorize the government

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT PHILIP R. MARTINEZ, District Judge. On this day, the Court considered Defendants BAC Home Loans Servicing, L.P. and the Bank of New York Mellon’s “Motion for Summary Judgment and Brief in Support” (ECF No. 32), filed on December 5, 2013 [hereinafter “Motion”]; Plaintiff Jose Santiago’s “Response to Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgme

388 B.R. 448 (2008) In re Alec G. SOHMER, Debtor. Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Plaintiff, v. Alec G. Sohmer, Individually and as Trustee of Certain Named Nominee Trusts; Jennifer Sohmer, Individually and as Trustee of Certain Named Nominee Trusts; Timeless Funding, Inc.; Andrew P. Palmer, Individually and as a Member of Andrew P. Palmer and Associates; Shaun M. Ellis, Individually and as a Member of Shaun M. Ellis, LLC; Carteret Mortgage Co

OPINION & ORDER Ronnie Abrams, United States District Judge Plaintiff Gordian Group, LLC brings this diversity action against Defendant Sy-ringa Exploration, Inc. alleging breach of an investment banking services contract. Syringa moved to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for lack of personal jurisdiction and pursuant to Rule 12(b)(7) for failure to join an ind

Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, RCFC 12(b)(6); Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 201-19; Violation of “On Time” Payment Requirement; FLSA Workweek Standard; FLSA Exempt Employees OPINION AND ORDER CAMPBELL-SMITH, Chief Judge This case arises from the fall 2013 budget impasse and resulting partial gover

MEMORANDUM & ORDER MARGO K. BRODIE, District Judge. AmTrust Bank (“AmTrust”) filed a Complaint on July 28, 2009, against Defendant Lea Jordan and others. (Docket Entry No. 1.) On January 7, 2010, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation *330(“FDIC”), as Receiver for AmTrust Bank, was substituted as Plaintiff. (January 7, 2010 Order.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER WILLIAM E. SMITH, Chief Judge. Plaintiff, Perfect Puppy, Inc., a pet store, has brought a declaratory judgment action to invalidate an ordinance passed by Defendant, the City of East Providence (the “City”). Before the Court are the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiffs motion (ECF No. 11) is DENIED and Defendant’s motion (ECF

(2008) PATRICK PATTERSON CUSTOM HOMES, INC., Patrick Patterson Development, Inc., Patrick H. Patterson and Alicia Patterson, Plaintiffs, v. Kathleen M. BACH, Defendant. No. 07 C 7204. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. November 14, 2008. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER MORTON DENLOW, United States Magistrate Judge.

795 F.Supp.2d 1255 (2011) Jamon BRIM, Plaintiff, v. MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC., Defendant. Case No. CV-10-J-369-S. United States District Court, N.D. Alabama, Southern Division. May 4, 2011. *1258 Leonard A. Bennett, Consumer Litigation Associates PC, Newport News, VA, Penny Hays Cauley, Hays Cauley PC, Darlington, SC, Ronal

813 F.Supp.2d 897 (2011) Chandra EVANS, Plaintiff, v. WALGREEN COMPANY, Defendant. No. 09-2491. United States District Court, W.D. Tennessee, Western Division. August 25, 2011. *906 Darrell J. O'Neal, Law Office of Darrell J. O'Neal, Memphis, TN, Aubrey Pittman, Kristin Kay Schroeder, The Pittman Law Firm, P.C., Dallas, TX, for P

543 U.S. 499 (2005) JOHNSON v. CALIFORNIA ET AL. No. 03-636. Supreme Court of United States. Argued November 2, 2004. Decided February 23, 2005. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. *500 *501 O'CONNOR, J., delivered the opinion of the Court,

MARCUS, Circuit Judge: Joseph Silvestri appeals his conviction after a jury trial for conspiring to launder the proceeds of mail and wire fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1956(h), and for 30 substantive counts of laundering the proceeds of mail and wire fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1957 and 2. All of the charges arose from Silvestri’s involvement in a fraudulent investm

OPINION AND ORDER HARMON, District Judge. Pending before the Court in the above referenced cause are two motions inter alia: (1) Plaintiffs Public Employees’ Retirement System of Ohio (“PERS”), State Teachers’ Retirement System of Ohio (“STRS”), School Employees’ Retirement System of Ohio (“SERS”), and Ohio State Highway Patrol Retirement System’s (“HPRS’s”) (collectively, the “Ohio Retir

449 F.3d 305 Joseph HAYDEN, on behalf of himself and all individuals similarly situated; Lumumba Akinwole-Bandelle, Wilson Andino, Gina Arias, Wanda Best-Deveaux, Carlos Bristol, Augustine Carmona, David Galarza, Kimalee Garner, Mark Graham, Keran Holmes, III, Chaujuantheyia Lochard, Steven Mangual, Jamel Massey, Stephen Ramon, Nilda Rivera, Lillian M. Rivera, Mario Romero, Jessica Sanclemente, Paul Satterfield and Barbara Scott, on behalf of thems

MEMORANDUM TRAUGER, District Judge. Pending before the court is the Motion for National Class Certification (Docket No. 537) filed by the plaintiffs Addie T. Coleman, William H. Harrison, and James L. Dixon, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, to which defendant General Motors Acceptance Corporation (“GMAC”) has responded (Docket No. 550), plaintiffs have replied (Docket N

42 F.Supp.2d 153 (1998) BRISTOL TECHNOLOGY, INC., Plaintiff, v. MICROSOFT CORPORATION, Defendant. No. Civ.A. 3-98-CV-1657. United States District Court, D. Connecticut. December 30, 1998. *154 *155 *156 *157 Patrick Lync

ACCEPTED 03-15-00085-CV 5176028 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS