Cases

JUDGMENT Per Curiam (Lourie, Moore, and O’Malley, Circuit Judges). This Cause having been heard and considered, it is Ordered and Adjudged: AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON, District Judge Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment came on for hearing before this court on March 25, 2015. Plaintiff (and counter-defendants) Netflix, Inc. (“plaintiff’ or “Netflix”) appeared through its counsel, Ashok Ramani, Tina Sessions, Ed Bayley, Michael Kwun, and Sharif Jacob. Defen-' dants (and counter-claimants) Rovi Corporation,

OPINION DEARIE, Senior District Judge: Plaintiffs-Appellants Meghan Mollett and Tracy Hellwig appeal the district court’s dismissal of their claims against Defendant-Appellee Netflix, Inc. (“Net-flix”), a subscription video streaming service, for violations of the Video Privacy Protection Act (‘VPPA”), 18 U.S.C. § 2710, and California Civil Code § 179

OPINION THOMAS, Chief Judge: These consolidated antitrust actions arise out of an agreement (“Promotion Agreement”) between Netflix and Wal-mart 1 whereby Walmart transferred its online DVD-rental subscribers to Netflix, and Netflix agreed to promote Walmart’s DVD sales business. The plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT WITH LEAVE TO AMEND EDWARD J. DAVILA, District Judge. Presently before the court is Defendant Netflix, Inc.’s (“Netflix”) Motion to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”) filed by Plaintiff Donald Cullen (“Cullen”), on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated. See Docket No. 31. Having fully reviewed the mov

*940 OPINION THOMAS, Chief Judge: In this appeal, class members challenge the district court’s approval of a settlement between Walmart 1 and a class of Netflix DVD subscribers arguing, among other matters, that the gift c

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF INVALIDITY UNDER § 101 RICHARD SEEBORG, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION In this patent infringement action, defendant Netflix, Inc. seeks summary judgment that three of the patents-in-suit are invalid under 35 U.S.C. § 101 for failure to claim patent-eligible subject matter. Net-flix contends U.S. Pa

477 F.Supp.2d 1063 (2007) NETFLIX, INC., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, v. BLOCKBUSTER, INC., a Delaware corporation, Defendant. No. C 06-02361 WHA. United States District Court, N.D. California. February 20, 2007. *1064 *1065 Jeffrey R. Chanin, Ashok Ramani, Asim M. Bhansali, Daralyn J. M

672 F.Supp.2d 1022 (2009) MEDIA QUEUE, LLC, Plaintiff, v. NETFLIX, INC., et al., Defendants. No. C 09-1027 SI. United States District Court, N.D. California. December 1, 2009. *1025 Michael John Newton, Stacey G. White, Jason Woodard Cook, Alston & Bird, Dallas, TX, Patrick D. O'Connor, Moyers Martin Santee & Imel, Tulsa,

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER REGARDING MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS (Dkt. No. 43) PONSOR, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs, the National Association of the Deaf (“NAD”), the Western Massachusetts Association of the Deaf and Hearing Impaired (“WMAD/HI”), and Lee Nettles, bring this action under Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) against

Case: 22-1138 Document: 41 Page: 1 Filed: 09/11/2023 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ NETFLIX, INC., Appellant v. DIVX, LLC, Appellee ______________________ 2022-1138 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Paten

Case: 22-1203 Document: 43 Page: 1 Filed: 10/25/2023 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ NETFLIX, INC., Appellant v. DIVX, LLC, Appellee ______________________ 2022-1203, 2022-1204 ______________________ Appeals from the United States Paten

Case: 21-1484 Document: 76 Page: 1 Filed: 07/27/2022 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ REALTIME ADAPTIVE STREAMING LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant v. NETFLIX, INC., NETFLIX STREAMING SERVICES, INC., Defendants-Cross-Appellants ______________________ 2021-1484, 2021-1485, 2021-1518, 2021-1519 _____

Case: 22-1138 Document: 41 Page: 1 Filed: 09/11/2023 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ NETFLIX, INC., Appellant v. DIVX, LLC, Appellee ______________________ 2022-1138 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Paten

Case: 21-1484 Document: 76 Page: 1 Filed: 07/27/2022 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ REALTIME ADAPTIVE STREAMING LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant v. NETFLIX, INC., NETFLIX STREAMING SERVICES, INC., Defendants-Cross-Appellants ______________________ 2021-1484, 2021-1485, 2021-1518, 2021-1519 _____

Case: 24-1541 Document: 42 Page: 1 Filed: 02/13/2026 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ NETFLIX, INC., Appellant v. DIVX, LLC, Appellee ______________________ 2024-1541 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Patent and Tr

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-2905 CITY OF EAST ST. LOUIS, ILLINOIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NETFLIX, INC., et al., Defendants-Appellees. ____________________ Appeal from the United States Di

Case: 24-1669 Document: 51 Page: 1 Filed: 02/09/2026 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ GOTV STREAMING, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant v. NETFLIX, INC., Defendant-Cross-Appellant ______________________ 2024-1669, 2024-1744 ______________________ Appeals from

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ________________ No. 22-2139 ________________ BOROUGH OF LONGPORT; TOWNSHIP OF IRVINGTON, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Appellants v. NETFLIX, INC.; HULU, LLC ________________ Ap

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS SAMUEL CONTI, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs Arkansas Teacher Retirement System and State-Boston Retirement System (“Plaintiffs”) bring this putative securities class action against Netflix, Inc. (“Netflix”); Netflix Co-Founder, Chairman of the Board, and CEO Reed Hastings (“Hastings”); current Netflix CFO David Wells