Cases

Opinion DUARTE, J. Plaintiff Uriel Jimenez (Jimenez) was injured at a middle school within defendant Roseville City School District (District). The 14-year-old Jimenez was in a classroom where fellow middle school students were purportedly practicing break dancing, but in which some were also performing “flips.” This violated school rules in two ways: first,

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JANELLE PEREZ, No. 15-16430 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 2:13-cv-02150- GEB-DAD CITY OF ROSEVILLE; ROSEVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT; STEPHAN MOORE, Captain; DANIEL HAHN, ORDER AND Chief; CAL WALSTAD, Lieutenant,

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JANELLE PEREZ, No. 15-16430 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 2:13-cv-02150- GEB-DAD CITY OF ROSEVILLE; ROSEVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT; STEPHAN MOORE, Captain; DANIEL HAHN,

296 F.3d 431 Sally DOE, as Next Friend of Jane Doe, a minor, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.CITY OF ROSEVILLE, Roseville Community Schools; John Kment; Frank Mayer; Betty Slinde; Leroy Herron; Dorothea Sue Silavs, in their individual and official capacities, jointly and severally, Defendants-Appellants. No. 01-1385. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Argued: Decemb

66 Cal.Rptr.3d 337 (2007) 155 Cal.App.4th 821 James PATTERSON, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. SACRAMENTO CITY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, Defendant and Respondent. No. C052703. Court of Appeal of California, Third District. September 25, 2007. *340 Gurnee & Daniels and Jerry M. Duncan, John A. Mason, Rosevil

ORDER Kimberly J. Mueller, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Approximately one month ago, doctors at a Kaiser Permanente hospital in Rose-ville, California determined that two-year-old Israel Stinson had suffered the irre*856versible cessation of all functions of his entire brain, including the brain stem. Under California law, this determination means

137 Mich. App. 118 (1984) 357 N.W.2d 829 ROSEVILLE COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTRICT v. ROSEVILLE FEDERATION OF TEACHERS Docket No. 73091. Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided September 4, 1984. LaBarge, Dinning, Lyons & Greve, P.C. (by Ronald H. Greve), for plaintiff. Miller, Cohen, Martens & Sugerman, P.C. (by M

*139Opinion BANKE, J.— I. Introduction This case involves the validity of a parcel tax approved by Alameda Unified School District (District) voters in June 2008 as Measure H. The issue before us is whether the tax violates Government Code section 50079, which authorizes school districts to levy “qualified special taxes.” (Gov. Code, §

132 Cal.Rptr.2d 1 (2003) 106 Cal.App.4th 1178 HOWARD JARVIS TAXPAYERS ASSOCIATION et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. CITY OF ROSEVILLE, Defendant and Appellant. No. C039942. Court of Appeal, Third District. February 10, 2003. *2 Eisen & Johnston Law Corporation, Jay-Allen Eisen, Marian M. Johnston,

132 Cal.Rptr.2d 748 (2003) 107 Cal.App.4th 1352 Christopher J. THOMPSON, a Minor, etc., et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. SACRAMENTO CITY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, Defendant and Respondent. No. C039862. Court of Appeal, Third District. March 25, 2003. *752 Jay-Allen Eisen, Jay-Allen Eisen Law Corporatio

OPINION BATCHELDER, Circuit Judge. Defendants Betty Slinde, Frank Mayer, Leroy Herron, John Kment and Dorothea Sue Silavs, appeal the district court’s order denying them summary judgment on qualified immunity grounds on the claims against them in their individual capacities under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Those claims allege that these individual defendants deprived Jane Doe, a minor, of her constitutional right

509 F.3d 934 (2007) Cheryl BLANCHARD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MORTON SCHOOL DISTRICT; Russ Davis, Superintendent; Regine Aleksunas, SE Teacher; Jim Grossman, SLP; Robyn Goodwin, Principal, Defendants-Appellees. No. 06-35388. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted July 31, 2007. Filed September 20, 2007. Amended Dece

504 F.3d 771 (2007) Cheryl BLANCHARD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MORTON SCHOOL DISTRICT; Russ Davis, Superintendent; Regine Aleksunas, SE Teacher; Jim Grossman, SLP; Robyn Goodwin, Principal, Defendants-Appellees. No. 06-35388. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted July 31, 2007. Filed September 20, 2007.

Ryan, J. (dissenting). This case requires us to determine whether an individual who has not acquired tenure by serving as a classroom teacher nonetheless earns such tenure for purposes of the teachers’ tenure act1 while employed as a superintendent of a local school district under a contract that precludes attainment of tenure as a superintendent.

WOOD, Chief Judge. Matthew Stanek, now 20 years old, is autistic. While he was a high school student in the St. Charles Community Unit School District # 303 (“the District”), he received special-education services. Although he is now in college, he and his parents, Bogdan and Sandra Stanek, still have some accounts to settle with the District. Invoking their rights under the fed

119 Cal.Rptr.2d 91 (2002) 97 Cal.App.4th 637 HOWARD JARVIS TAXPAYERS ASSOCIATION et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. CITY OF ROSEVILLE, Defendant and Appellant. No. C036295. Court of Appeal, Third District. April 12, 2002. As Modified on Denial of Rehearing May 13, 2002. Review Denied July 10, 2002. Mark J

ENGEL, Chief Judge. This action is before us on cross-appeals by the plaintiff Jack R. Cremeans and by defendants Thomas H. Asman and Thomas VanDamme. Cremeans claims that the trial court erred in refusing to reinstate him to his position as a patrolman following a favorable jury verdict on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim. Asman and VanDamme allege that as a matter of law plaintiff failed to present sufficient evidence to create a

861 F.2d 878 47 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 38,386 Jack R. CREMEANS, Plaintiff-Appellee, Cross-Appellant,v.CITY OF ROSEVILLE, a Municipal Corporation, City ofRoseville Police Department, Thomas H. Asman, Chief ofPolice Department and member of the City of RosevilleRetirement Board, Roseville Police Officer's Association, anonprofit labor organization, The City of RosevilleRetirement Board, and T. Vand

OPINION BYBEE, Circuit Judge: We agreed to rehear this case en banc to clarify under what circumstances the IDEA’S exhaustion requirement bars non-IDEA federal or state law claims. Appellant Windy Payne, on behalf of herself and her son, D.P., appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment to the defendants. The district court dismissed her claim for lack of subject matter juri

625 F.3d 459 (2010) Jonathan DOE, a minor, by Dorothy DOE, his legal guardian and next friend, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. TODD COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al., Defendants-Appellants. South Dakota Advocacy Services, Inc., Amicus Curiae. No. 09-3221. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: June 17, 2010. Filed: November 12, 2010.