Cases

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE CROWN CASTLE FIBER LLC, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. N21C-08-126 PRW ) CITY OF WILMINGTON and ) DELAWARE DEPARTMENT OF ) TRANSPORTATION, ) Defendants. ) Submitted: July 26, 2022

Pabst Brewing Company v. Frederick P. Winner, Ltd., No. 8, September Term, 2021. Opinion by Biran, J. STATUTORY INTERPRETATION – SUCCESSOR BEER MANUFACTURER – Maryland’s Successor Manufacturers Law defines a “successor beer manufacturer” to include “a person or license holder who replaces a beer manufacturer with the right to sell, distribute, or import a brand of beer.” Md. Code Ann., Alco. Bev. § 5-201(a)(5) (2016). The Court of Appeals held that, in order to qualify as a successor beer manu

Joseph F. Bataillon, Senior United States District Judge This matter is before the Court on the plaintiff's motion for a summary judgment of noninfringement (D.I. 85) and defendant's opposition thereto and purported cross-motion for summary judgment on its affirmative defenses.1 D.I. 88. This is an action for patent infringement, pursuant to

SEITZ, Justice, dissenting: The October 30, 2012 order from this Court remanded the case to the Superior Court, to remand to the Court of Common Pleas, to allow the presentation of facts by Eastern in support of an equitable subro-gation claim.33 In my view, the facts stipulated by the parties after remand satisfy all of the elements of an equitable subrogation claim. Equitable subr

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE TODD SWIFT, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2021-0525-LWW ) HOUSTON WIRE & CABLE ) COMPANY, ) ) Defendant.

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE JUSTIN CORNETT, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2024-1130-SEM ) COLLECTABLE SPORTS ASSETS, ) LLC ) ) Defendant. ) Repo

MEMORANDUM DECISION DENYING MOTION TO APPROVE SETTLEMENT WILLIAM T. THURMAN, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge The matter before the Court is the Motion Pursuant to Federal Rule Of Bankruptcy Procedure 9019 to Approve Settlement Agreement By and Between CS Mining, LLC and David J. Richards, LLC d/b/a Western US Mineral Investors, LLC (the ‘WUMI Motion”) filed by the Debtor and debtor-in-possession, CS Mining,

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION (Docket No. 2) HILLMAN, DISTRICT JUDGE Plaintiff moves to preliminarily enjoin Defendants from marketing and selling any product used for the collection of amalgam in dental wastewater streams under the name “HOG,” For the reasons set forth below, this motion is denied. Background The follo

Stephani W. Humrickhouse, United States Bankruptcy Judge The matters before the court are the Motion to Remand and Abstain filed by TCI Triangle, Inc. ("TCI") on March 29, *8602018, Dkt. 17 and the Motion to Remand filed by McGrath RentCorp ("McGrath") on March 29, 2018, Dkt. 22 (collectively, the "Motions to Remand"). A response in oppositio

800 F.Supp.2d 633 (2011) ZF MERITOR LLC and Meritor Transmission Corporation, Plaintiffs, v. EATON CORPORATION, Defendant. Civil No. 06-623-SLR. United States District Court, D. Delaware. August 4, 2011. *635 Karen V. Sullivan, Esquire of Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP, Wilmington, DE, for Plaintiffs. Of Counsel: R. Bruce Holcomb

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE SEOKOH, INC., ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2020-0613-JRS ) LARD-PT, LLC, ) ) Respondent, ) )

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE BOBCAT NORTH AMERICA, LLC, ) Plaintiff, ) ) V. ) CA. No. N19C-12-168 ) PRW CCLD INLAND WASTE HOLDINGS, ) BART A. BEGLEY, ) MONTGOMERY M. DAVIDSON, ) AND ROBERT A. SMITH ) Defendants. ) Submitted: May 19, 2020 Decided: August 17, 2020 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Upon Defendants Inland Waste Holdings, Bart A. Begley, Montgomery M. Davidson, and Robert A. Smith’s Motion to Dismiss, DENIED. Joel Friedlander, Esquire, Christopher M. Foulds, Esqui

MEMORANDUM ORDER MARY PAT THYNGE, United States Magistrate Judge. Procedural Background Presently before the court are discovery issues arising not only between the parties, but also involving a third-party. Consistent with the court’s standard order dealing with discovery matters, the parties and Nokia Corporation (“Nokia”) contacted the court to schedule a telephon

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN RE APPRAISAL OF DOLE FOOD ) CONSOLIDATED COMPANY, INC. ) C.A. No. 9079-VCL OPINION Date Submitted: October 14, 2014 Date Decided: December 9, 2014 Stuart M. Grant, Geoffrey C. Jarvis, Kimberly A. Evans, GRANT & EISENHOFER, P.A., Wilmington, Delaware; Attorneys for Petitioners Hudson Bay Master Fund

274 B.R. 631 (2002) In re FRUIT OF THE LOOM, INC., et al., Debtors. DDJ Capital Management, LLC, et al., Appellants, v. Fruit of the Loom, Inc., et al., Appellees. Bankruptcy No. 99-04497. CIV.A. No. 02-36-SLR. United States District Court, D. Delaware. March 12, 2002. *632 Janet Kathleen Stickles, Saul Ewing LLP, Wilmington,

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ALFREDO J. MARTINEZ and ) HIGHTOWER ADVISORS, LLC, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2019-1005-SG ) GPB CAPITAL HOLDINGS, LLC, ) ) Defendant.

972 A.2d 799 (2009) MOBILE DIAGNOSTIC GROUP HOLDINGS, LLC, Mobile Diagnostic Intermediate Holdings, Inc., Diagnostic Labs Holdings, LLC and Kan-Di-Ki, LLC, Plaintiffs, v. Robert SUER, Defendant. Civil Action No. 4298-CC. Court of Chancery of Delaware. Submitted: February 20, 2009. Decided: March 24, 2009. *800 Ch

OPINION LAURIE SELBER SILVERSTEIN, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE On December 14, 2015, I entered an order confirming a plan of reorganization for then-debtors Millennium Lab Holdings II, LLC and certain of its affiliates (“Millennium” or “Debtors”).1 The plan provided for third party releases in favor of various non-debtor entities, including, as relevant here, certain of the De

OPINION1 BRENDAN LINEHAN SHANNON, Bankruptcy Judge. Before the Court is Indianapolis Downs, LLC’s (“Indianapolis Downs” or the “Debtor”) motion for a determination of the legality of certain taxes under § 505(a) of the Bankruptcy Code2 (the “Tax Motion”).3 This contested matter4 presents a d

MEMORANDUM OPINION SUE L. ROBINSON, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION On January 14, 2011, ButamaxTM Advanced Biofuels LLC (“plaintiff’ or “Buta*363max”) filed suit in this district against Gevo, Inc. (“defendant” or “Gevo”) alleging infringement of United States Patent No. 7,851,188 (“the '188 patent”). (D.I. 1) The '188 patent d