Cases

HOLMES, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff-Appellant Sonja Morris appeals from the district court’s orders granting judgment on the pleadings on her First Amendment retaliation claim brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and summary judgment on her claim for sexual harassment under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17, in favor of Defendant-Appellee City of Color

226 P.3d 1248 (2010) Michael Sean EDMOND, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF COLORADO SPRINGS, a Colorado municipal corporation; Lorne Kramer, City of Colorado Springs Manager of Public Safety; Dave Felice, Interim Chief of Police of the City of Colorado Springs; Kurt Pillard, Commander of the CSPD Metro VNI Unit; Terry Lauhon, City of Colorado Springs Police Officer; Two Unknown City of Colorado Springs Police Department (CSPD) Evidence Technicians

BRORBY, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff Philip C. Butler, proceeding pro se, appeals from the district court’s decision granting summary judgment in favor of defendant Shawn Compton and denying Mr. Butler’s motion to amend his complaint. We have jurisdiction pursuant to *127828 U.S.C. § 1291, and we reverse and remand for further proceedings. I. Backgr

CHIEF JUSTICE RICE delivered the Opinion of the Court. *509¶ 1 This case presents the question of whether Aspen's $0.20 paper bag charge is a tax subject to voter approval under the Taxpayer's Bill of Rights ("TABOR").1 The trial court held that this charge is not subject to TABOR because it is not a tax, but a fe

322 N.W.2d 8 (1982) CITY OF HOT SPRINGS, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. GUNDERSON'S INC., a South Dakota Corporation, Defendant and Appellant, and Phelps-Benz and Associates, Inc., a Colorado Corporation, Defendant and Appellee. No. 13481. Supreme Court of South Dakota. Submitted on Briefs November 20, 1981. Decided July 14, 1982.

The summaries of the Colorado Court of Appeals published opinions constitute no part of the opinion of the division but have been prepared by the division for the convenience of the reader. The summaries may not be cited or relied upon as they are not the official language of the division. Any discrepancy between the language in the summary and in the opinion should be resolved in favor of the language in the opinion.

1 2025 CO 36 Jefferson County, Colorado, Petitioner v. Krista Dozier. Respondent No. 23SC483Supreme Court of Colorado, En BancJune 9, 2025 Certiorari to the Colorado Court of Appeals Court of Appeals Case No. 21CA1726 Attorneys for Petitioner:

TYMKOVICH, Chief Judge. Big Cats of Serenity Springs is a Colorado-based non-profit that provides housing, food, and veterinary care for exotic animals. The facility is regulated by the United States Department of Agriculture’s Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS), established pursuant to the Animal Welfare Act. Three APHIS inspectors accompanied by El Paso County sh

COLORADO COURT OF APPEALS 2017COA117 Court of Appeals No. 15CA0449 Mesa County District Court No. 07CR851 Honorable Valerie J. Robison, Judge The People of the State of Colorado, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Christopher Edward Butler, Defendant-Appellant. ORDER AFFIRMED Division II Opinion by JUDGE DAILEY Fox and Plank*, JJ., concur

NICHOLAS Venetucci sued the city of Colorado Springs for damages. He claims that a dike constructed by defendant diverted onto his property surface or flood water that, but for such dike, would have gone elsewhere. The verdict and judgment went against him, and he is here seeking a reversal of the judgment. Plaintiff's counsel argue only two assignments of error; namely, "(1) That the verdict and judgment is contrary to all of the evidence and is not supported by the evidence; and (2)

ACCEPTED 15-25-00022-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 9/26/2025 10:33 PM No. 15-25-00022-CV CHRIST

IN this opinion the defendant in error will be referred to as the plaintiff, and the plaintiffs in error as the defendants. On application of the plaintiff, the district court ordered the issuance of a peremptory writ of mandamus, commanding the defendants to issue to the plaintiff a permit to install and maintain a dry cleaning business on premises described in the alternative writ theretofore issued. The case is here on writ of error sued out by the defendants. Section 783 of a Color

252 P.3d 539 (2011) In the Matter of the ESTATE OF Matthew D. KEENAN, a protected person, Appellant, v. COLORADO STATE BANK AND TRUST, Appellee. No. 10CA0112. Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. V. February 17, 2011. *540 Morgan Legal Offices, P.C., Chester H. Morgan, Colorado Springs, Colorado, for Appellant. Wade Ash Woods H

172 F.3d 736 15 NDLR P 35, 1999 CJ C.A.R. 2143 William Adrian BUTLER, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.CITY OF PRAIRIE VILLAGE, KANSAS; H. Monroe Taliaferro, Jr.,Mayor; Barbara J. Vernon, City Administrator; CarolPendleton, Chairman of Policy and Services Committee;Jerald R. Robnett, former Director of Public WorksDepartment, Defendants-Appellees. No. 97-3291.

EBEL, Circuit Judge. The First Amendment protects a government employee's speech (1) made as a citizen (2) on a matter of public concern (3) if the employee's right to speak outweighs the government's interest as an employer in an efficient workplace. These are the first three steps of the familiar five-part Garcetti/ Pickering analysis1 and they present legal questions for a court to r

*114Opinion by Judge WEBB. In this property tax dispute, plaintiff, Qwest Corporation ("Qwest"), appeals the *115trial court's judgment granting the motion to dismiss of defendant, Colorado Division of Property Taxation, Department of Local Affairs, State of Colorado ("DPT"). According to Qwest, becaus

Opinion filed April 3, 2025 In The Eleventh Court of Appeals __________ No. 11-23-00204-CV __________ CITY OF RANGER, Appellant V. RANGER AIRFIELD MAINTENANCE FOUNDATION, Appellee On Appeal from the 91st District Court Eastland

482 F.3d 1277 Philip C. BUTLER, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Shawn COMPTON, Defendant-Appellee. No. 06-1274. United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. April 17, 2007. Submitted on the briefs:* Philip C. Butler, Plaintiff-Appellant, Pro se.

The summaries of the Colorado Court of Appeals published opinions constitute no part of the opinion of the division but have been prepared by the division for the convenience of the reader. The summaries may not be cited or relied upon as they are not the official language of the division. Any discrepancy between the language in the summary and in the opinion should be resolved in favor of the language in the opinion.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO Docket No. 37800 THOMAS WEISEL, a married man dealing ) in his sole and separate property, ) ) Twin Falls, November 2011 Term Plaintiff-Appellant, ) ) 2012 Opinion No. 37 v. )