Cases

OPINION VIGIL, J. {1} In this case we determine whether the City of Albuquerque Ordinance (the City Ordinance) which prohibits public nudity discriminates against women in violation of the Equal Rights Amendment in the New Mexico Constitution because it prohibits a woman from showing her breast in a public place without a fully opaque covering of her entire

513 F.3d 492 (2008) Holly BUSH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Rodney Jack STRAIN, Jr., in his official capacity as Sheriff of St. Tammany Parish; Dale Galloway, Detective, individually and in his official capacity as a St. Tammany Parish Sheriff Deputy; Ronald Plaisance, Deputy, individually and in his official capacity as a St. Tammany Parish Sheriff Deputy, Defendants-Appellees. No. 05-30837. United States

PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 603 U. S. Part 1 Pages 520–592 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT June 28, 2024 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are requ

Case: 21-30015 Document: 00516008948 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/10/2021 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED September 10, 2021

ACCEPTED 03-15-00596-CV 7771576 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 11/10/2015 3:54:12 PM

ACCEPTED 03-15-00596-CV 8332526 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

648 F.Supp.2d 726 (2009) CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF the UNITED STATES of America, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Janet NAPOLITANO, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. AW-08-3444. United States District Court, D. Maryland, Southern Division. August 25, 2009. *728 James F. Segroves, Malcolm J. Harkins, III, Lawrence Z. Lorber, Proskauer Rose

465 F.Supp.2d 1164 (2006) Paul F. WEINBAUM, Olivia S. Weinbaum, Martin J. Boyd, Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF LAS CRUCES, NEW MEXICO, William Mattiace, individually, and in his official capacity as Mayor of the City of Las Cruces, Dolores Archuleta, individually, and in her capacity as a member of the City Council of the City of Las Cruces, New Mexico, Dolores Connor, individually, and in her capacity as a member of the City Council of the City of Las C

740 P.2d 693 (1987) Richard D. BOKUM II, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK IN ALBUQUERQUE, a National Banking Association, Defendant-Appellee. No. 16574. Supreme Court of New Mexico. July 29, 1987. Rehearing Denied August 20, 1987. *694 Melton & Puccini, Stephen P. Curtis, Albuquerque, Stephenson, C

446 F.Supp.2d 1233 (2006) John David QUINLY, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF PRAIRIE VILLAGE, KANSAS, Defendant. No. 06-2327-JWL. United States District Court, D. Kansas. August 31, 2006. *1234 John M. Simpson, John M. Simpson, Attorney at Law, Stephen D. Bonney, Bonney Law Office, Kansas City, MO, for Plaintiff. Amii N. Castle, Cha

JUSTICE HARRISON, dissenting: Contrary to my colleagues, I believe that section 2 of Article XI of the Illinois Constitution of 1970 (Ill. Const. 1970, art. XI, § 2) does authorize Dr. Glisson to bring this action to enforce the provisions of the Illinois Endangered Species Protection Act (520 ILCS 10/1 et seq. (West 1998)). <

Plaintiff, Jim Davis and Company ("Davis"), appeals from a summary judgment in favor of Albuquerque Federal Savings Loan Association ("AFS"), defendant-intervenor, in plaintiff's action against Centennial Office Venture ("Centennial"), defendant, to recover certain rent monies owed by tenants of a building formerly owned by Centennial. The summary judgment was made final pursuant to Rule 54(b), A.R.Civ.P. We affirm. Centennial owned an office building occupied by a number of te

896 S.W.2d 143 (1995) CITY OF BEAUMONT, Maurice Meyers, Albert Haines, and Ray Riley, Petitioners, v. Woodford D. BOUILLION, Cecil E. Rush, John G. Parsons, Charles A. Perricone and Eugene T. Corder, Respondents. No. D-4004. Supreme Court of Texas. Argued May 4, 1994. Decided February 16, 1995. Rehearing Overruled May 11, 1995. Jame

524 F.Supp. 12 (1981) Lloyd BUSH d/b/a Lloyd Bush & Associates, a sole proprietorship of the State of New York, Plaintiff, v. STERN BROTHERS & CO., Defendant. No. 80 Civ. 2305 (CBM). United States District Court, S. D. New York. January 22, 1981. *13 Liddle McMillin & Henze by Jeffrey L. Liddle, New York City, for pla

499 F.2d 767 Jose LOPEZ and First National Bank in Albuquerque,Co-Administrators and Personal Representatives ofthe Estates of Cecilia Cardiel de Lopez,et al., Plaintiff-Appellees,v.SOUTHERN PACIFIC COMPANY, a corporation,Defendant-Appellant, Third Party Plaintiff, v. TheCITY OF ALAMOGORDO, NEW MEXICO, ThirdParty Defendant-Appellee. No. 73-1675. United States Court o

505 P.2d 1223 (1973) 84 N.M. 547 DUNHAM-BUSH, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. A. J. PALKOVIC and A. J. Palkovic, d/b/a P & C Equipment, Defendant-Appellee. No. 9520. Supreme Court of New Mexico. February 2, 1973. *1224 Lorenzo A. Chavez, Melvin L. Robins, Albuquerque, for appellant. I. M. Smalley,

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT STATE OF WASHINGTON; STATE OF No. 20-35391 CALIFORNIA; STATE OF COLORADO; STATE OF CONNECTICUT; STATE OF D.C. No. DELAWARE; DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA; 2:20-cv-00111- STATE OF HAWAII; STATE OF RAJ ILLINOIS; STATE OF MAINE; STATE OF MARYLAND; COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS; STATE OF OPINION MICHIGAN; STATE OF MINNESOTA; STATE OF NEW JERSEY; S

81 F.Supp.2d 1166 (1999) EAST HIGH GAY/STRAIGHT ALLIANCE, an unincorporated association; Ivy Fox, a minor, by and through her mother and next friend, Kay Kosow Fox; Keysha Barnes, a minor by and through her father and next friend, James Barnes; and Leah Farrel, by and through her mother and next friend, Kelly Fogarty, Plaintiffs, v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF SALT LAKE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT, a body corporate of the State of Utah; Darline Robles, Superi

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Mary Saucedo, et al. v. Civil No. 17-cv-183-LM Opinion No. 2018 DNH 160 William Gardner, Secretary of State of the State of New Hampshire, in his official capacity, et al. O R D E R This case concerns New Hampshire’s signature-match requirement for absentee ballots. The act

Appellate Case: 22-1023 Document: 010111040629 Date Filed: 04/30/2024 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS April 30, 2024