Cases

Ellington, Justice. Jeremy Scott was convicted of felony murder, aggravated assault, possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony, and criminal use of a firearm with an altered identification mark in connection with the death of Romondo Ashley.1 Scott contends *815that his trial counsel was ineffective

NAHMIAS, Justice. Appellant Windy Scott (“Appellant”) challenges her convictions for malice murder and a gun crime in connection with the shooting death of William Scott (“Scott”). Appellant claims that she was denied the effective assistance of counsel for her trial. We conclude that Appellant’s trial counsel performed deficiently in not seeking expert assistance in evaluating her mental condition at the time of shooting an

EDWIN A. LOMBARD, Judge. |, The sole issue in this appeal is whether the defendant’s sentence should be vacated and the matter remanded for resentencing. After review of the record in light of the applicable law and arguments of the parties, we vacate the defendant’s sentence and remand for resentencing. Relevant Facts and Procedural History In January 2009, as a result of c

JUDGMENT PER CURIAM. This Cause having been heard and considered, it is Ordered and Adjudged: AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

MEMORANDUM ** Plaintiff-Appellant Stephen Ezell appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Defendant-Appellee Rick Burton in the parties’ dispute over Ezell’s investment in an Arizona land development venture in which Burton was involved. Ezell alleged that Burton violated federal securities laws and Nevada state law1 by misleading Ezell about the potential f

PER CURIAM. DISMISSED. See Bared & Co., Inc. v. McGuire, 670 So.2d 153, 157 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996) ("If petitioner has failed to make a prima facie showing of irreparable harm, we lack jurisdiction and will enter an order dismissing the petition.”). LEWIS, MAKAR, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., CONCUR.

MEMORANDUM ** Plaintiff-Appellant Stephen Ezell appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Defendant-Appellee Rick Burton in the parties’ dispute over Ezell’s investment in an Arizona land development venture in which Burton was involved. Ezell alleged that Burton violated federal securities laws and Nevada state law1 by misleading Ezell about the potential f

2009 OK CR 10 JOHN CHRISTIAN BURTON, Appellant v. STATE OF OKLAHOMA, Appellee No. F-2007-511. Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma. Decided: March 6, 2009. Anna Johnson, Assistant Public Defender, Tulsa, OK, Attorney for Defendant. Stuart Southerland, Assistant Public Defender, Tulsa, OK, Attorney for Appellant. Scott Gengras, Assistant District Attor

308 F.Supp.2d 16 (2004) Kathryn BURTON, et al. Plaintiffs, v. Gale NORTON, et al. Defendants. No. CIV.A.03-1102(EGS). United States District Court, District of Columbia. March 26, 2004. *17 Erik Scott Jaffe, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff. Robert Lee Gulley, US Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Defendant. </

FISHER, Associate Judge: Appellants, each of whom had worked for the Metropolitan Police Department for more than fifteen years, were reduced in rank from the position of Commander. They appealed to the Office of Employee Appeals (OEA), claiming that, as Career Service employees, they could not be demoted without cause. In separate decisions, the OEA held that even though appellants were Career Service employees, the Chief o

REAVLEY, Circuit Judge: Plaintiff-Appellant Nicole Burton appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Defendant-Appellees Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. (“Freescale”), Manpower of Texas, L.P., Manpower, Inc., and Transpersonnel, Inc. (collectively, “Manpower”). Burton brought a claim under the Americans with Disabilities Act (the “ADA”) alleging discriminat

TAYLOR, J. In this premises liability case, the plaintiff, Janet K. Burton, appeals a final summary judgment entered in favor of the defendants, MDC PGA Plaza Corp. (MDC) and Holiday CVS (CVS). The trial court granted summary judgment upon its finding that the defendants were not under a duty to warn the plaintiff of a pothole on the premises, or repair it, because the plaintiff was aware of its presence and condition when she

775 F.Supp.2d 1093 (2011) Glenn BURTON Jr., Plaintiff, v. AMERICAN CYANAMID CO., et al., Defendants. Case No. 07-C-0303. United States District Court, E.D. Wisconsin. April 5, 2011. *1095 Fidelma L. Fitzpatrick, Jonathan D. Orent, Michael G. Rousseau, Motley Rice LLC, Providence, RI, Peter G. Earle, Law Offices of Peter Earle LLC

FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ Case No. 5D23-2070 LT Case No. 2020-CA-04991 _____________________________ RHONDA SCOFIELD and SANDRA BURTON, Petitioners, v. SCOTT GABRIEL, Respondent. _____________________________ Petition for Writ of Prohibition. Curt Jacobus, Respondent Judge. Mark D. Tinker, of Cole,

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2021-SA-00441-SCT MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE v. EKB, INC., SCOTT BURTON AND EMILY BURTON DATE OF JUDGMENT: 03/25/2021 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. LAWRENCE LEE LITTLE TRIAL COURT ATTORNEYS: HARRIS H. BARNES III JAMES WILLIAMS JANOUSH MORTON

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of Norwood v. Horney, 110 Ohio St.3d 353, 2006-Ohio-3799, 853 N.E.2d 1115. Moyer, C.J., Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell and Lanzinger, JJ., concur. Resnick, J., not participating.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA MIDLAND FUNDING, LLC., NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND Petitioner, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED v. CASE NO. 1D17-3631 BURTON SCOTT, Respondent. ___________________________/ Opinion file

On Petition for Rehearing DURHAM, Justice. T1 Both plaintiffs and defendants have asked this court to reconsider various portions of its opinion in this case, issued on January 19, 2000. A majority of the court is unwilling to rehear any of the issues raised by plaintiffs' petition. However, defendants have identified an inconsistency between the "Summary" portion of our earlier opinion and the actual holding of t

VILLANTI, Chief Judge. Villages of Avignon Community Development District (the Villages) seeks review of the final declaratory judgment entered in favor of Ken Burton, Jr., Manatee County Tax Collector, in an action to determine the priority of competing liens held by the Villages and Manatee County against the same real property. The parties agreed on the facts, and the case was

DISMISSED and Opinion Filed January 17, 2018. In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-17-01319-CR MATTHEW SCOTT BURTON, JR., Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law