Cases

491 F.3d 1053 Robert BURNSIDE; Francisco Gomez; Ray Arnett, Individually, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated; Charles Lingenfelter; Ron Crues; Charles R. Williams, Individually, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.KIEWIT PACIFIC CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation; Does, 1 through 100 inclusive. Defendants-Appellees. No. 04-57134.

*848MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JOHN R. TUNHEIM, District Judge. This is an action brought by plaintiff Reid Sagehorn against Independent School District Number 728 (“ISD No. 728”); Roman Pierskalla, the Principal of Rogers High School; Mark Bezek, the Superintendent of ISD No. 728; and Jana Hennen-Burr, the Assistant Superintendent of ISD No. 728 (c

This opinion was filed for record . FIETE IN CLERKS OFFICE at. ^'.QOAnn-^ onC!^^b^f'n.^1 SUPRBC COURT,ame OF WMStCNOTOM DATE OCT 19 Pe^o'^ -fer SUSAN L; CARLSON CHIEFousnce f supReme^ourt clerk IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE

JULIE A. ROBINSON, CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Plaintiffs, who are all minor students in the Shawnee Mission School District ("SMSD" or "the District"), bring this action by and through their next friends under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and the Kansas Student Publications Act, for claims arising out of the District's

Representative Paul Schauer Colorado House of Representatives State Capitol Denver, CO 80203 Dear Representative Schauer: In your letter of September 4, 1984 you asked four questions regarding constitutional impediments to legislative action concerning the reorganization of higher education in Colorado. The questions and my conclusions are as follows: QUESTIONS PRESENTED AND CONCLUSIONS 1. To what extent could legislation be enacted to reorganize the govern

This suit involves the location of the boundary line between Blocks 3 and 4 of the Francis W. Johnson Survey in Gregg County. In 1914, the Francis W. Johnson Survey, and a small amount of land in an adjoining survey, was owned by several persons, including one James Moore. In the year mentioned, the several owners caused the land to be divided into nine tracts, and executed deeds effecting a partition of the land. For details concerning this partition, reference is made to the opinion

OPINION EHRLICH, Judge. ¶ 1 Three teachers who had retired from the Phoenix Union High School District (“District”) filed complaints of age discrimination by the District with the Arizona Civil Rights Division of the Arizona Department of Law (“State”). Two of the teachers had opted to take early retirement before age sixty-five, and one teacher had retired after age sixty-five. The State determined that

273 F.Supp.2d 1353 (2003) In re ADELPHIA COMMUNICATIONS CORP. SECURITIES & DERIVATIVE LITIGATION (NO. II) No. MDL-1529. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation. July 23, 2003. *1354 Before WM. TERRELL HODGES, Chairman, JOHN F. KEENAN, BRUCE M. SELYA, JULIA SMITH GIBBONS, D. LOWELL JENSEN, J. FREDERICK MOTZ and ROBERT L. MILLER, Jr

*793Dolliver, J. These consolidated appeals arise from an insurance coverage dispute involving the Washington Public Power Supply System (WPPSS) bond default. The Defendants, International Insurance Company (International) and Industrial Underwriters Insurance Company (Industrial), appeal from a jury verdict awarding the Plaintiffs $13 million in liability insurance covera

468 S.E.2d 712 (1996) 196 W.Va. 97 FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE, LODGE NUMBER 69, and Thomas L. Hartley, Plaintiffs Below, Fraternal Order of Police, Lodge Number 69, Appellant, v. The CITY OF FAIRMONT and Edwin Thorne, as City Manager, Defendants Below, Appellees. No. 22905. Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia. Submitted January 17, 1996.

Smith, J. Petitioners, two local chapters of the Fraternal Order of Eagles, Tenino and Whidbey Island Aeries, and several female members of the Tenino Aerie ask this court to review a decision of the Court of Appeals, Division Two, which reversed a ruling of the Thurston County Superior Court that the male-only membership policy of the Grand Aerie of the Fraternal Order of Eagles barring admission of new female applicants violat

59 P.3d 655 (2002) FRATERNAL ORDER OF EAGLES, TENINO AERIE NO. 564; Kathleen L. Conner; Lanette Davis; Julia A. Foster; Gayle L. Hartman; Kaycee L. Johnson; Annette M. Riley; Diane E. Roberts; Janet Tresenriter; Alice F. Vasser; and Whidbey Island Aerie No. 3418, Petitioners, v. GRAND AERIE OF FRATERNAL ORDER OF EAGLES, and Washington State Aerie, Fraternal Order of Eagles Washington State Aerie, Respondents. No. 71786-9.

992 F.Supp. 162 (1996) BUILDING INDUSTRY FUND et al., Plaintiffs, v. LOCAL UNION NO. 3, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS, AFL — CIO et al., Defendants. No. 93 CV 2721. United States District Court, E.D. New York. February 8, 1996. Opinion on Reconsideration May 8, 1996. *163

THE subject of controversy in these causes, between James Burnsides, and Andrew Reid, on behalf of Samuel Culbertson, was four bund red acres of land, called Culbertsons bottom, clamed in right of settlement, with six hundred acres of the land adjacent, clamed in right of preemption. Andrew Culbertson bad made a settlement on the land called *151bis bottom, in 1153 ; left it th

THE subject of controversy in these causes, between James Burnsides, and Andrew Reid, on behalf of Samuel Culbertson, was four hundred acres of land, called Culbertsons bottom,. clamed in right of settlement, with six hundred acres of the land adjacent, clamed in right of preemption. Andrew Culbertson had made a settlement on the land called *151his bottom, in 1.753 ; left it t

THEJ subject of controversy in these causes, between James Burnsides, and Andrew Reid, on behalf of Samuel Culbertson, was four hundred acres of land, called Culbertsons bottom, clamed in right of settlement, with six hundred acres of the land adjacent, clamed in right of preemption. Andrew Culbertson had made a settlement on the land called *his bottom, in 1753; left it through fear of the indians; and afterwards sold it to Samuel Culberts

Chief Justice Marshall delivered the opinion of the Court. In March, 1850, Blythe filed his bill, charging that in 1842, he had obtained a judgment against Burnsides for $183 71 due of the 1st day of February, 1841, and costs, subject to a credit of $100, paid on the 1st day of April, 1841, on which an execution had issued and been returned “no property found,” and that the judgment remains wholly unpaid. The b

Chief Justice Marshall delivered Hie opinion of the Court. To this opinion a petition for re-hearing was filed and the opinion sus. ponded until 2d July, 18dil, when the suspension was removed. By his last will, executed in July, 1839, and admitted to record in the following December, Robert Burnsides, after directing the payment of his debts, devises to his wife during her life or widowhood, all his land

612 F.Supp. 86 (1985) Mary BOYD, Jamesina Boyd, Patricia Beverly, Diane Baldwin and Orlando Johnson v. BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF the McGEHEE SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 17, Buford Conner, Individually and in his official capacity as Superintendent of the McGehee School District No. 17, Robert Hardin, Carol Lucky, Breck Smith, Robert Prosser and Tyrone Broomfield, Individually and in their official capacities as Members of the Board of Directors of the McGehe

Justice Brennan announced the judgment of the Court and delivered an opinion, in which Justice Marshall and Justice Stevens joined, and in which Justice Blackmun joined except for Part II-A-(l). The principal question presented is whether the First Amendment1 imposes limitations upon the exercise by a local *856school board