Cases

ILLINOIS OFFICIAL REPORTS Appellate Court People v. Burney, 2011 IL App (4th) 100343 Appellate Court THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Caption TIMOTHY L. BURNEY, Defendant-Appellant. District & No. Fourth District Docket No. 4-10-0343 Filed December 27, 2011 Modified upon deni

HELENE N. WHITE, Circuit Judge. I respectfully dissent. The majority fails to appreciate the significance of Bur-ney’s moving into the Litchfield property and wrongly imputes Ross’s alleged bad acts to Burney by relieving the Government of the obligation to show probable cause to believe that the property was still used as a “stash house” after Burney moved in. I would reverse the denial of Burney’s suppression motion and vacat

963 N.E.2d 430 (2011) 357 Ill. Dec. 477 The PEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Timothy L. BURNEY, Defendant-Appellant. No. 4-10-0343. Appellate Court of Illinois, Fourth District. December 27, 2011. As Modified upon denial of rehearing January 26, 2012. *434 Michael J.

NOTICE The text of this opinion can be corrected before the opinion is published in the Pacific Reporter. Readers are encouraged to bring typographical or other formal errors to the attention of the Clerk of the Appellate Courts: 303 K Street, Anchorage, Alaska 99501 Fax: (907) 264-0878 E-mail: corrections@akcourts.gov IN THE COURT OF

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 409 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 410 Plaintiffs appeal from a summary judgment dismissing the claims for relief they brought pursuant to R.C. 2933.32

OPINION BY Judge P. KEVIN BROBSON. On remand from the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1 we consider for a second time the appeal of Takeela Burney (Claimant) from the March 14, 2012 Order of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County (trial court), granting the Forfeiture Petition of the Commonwe

GILLETTE, P. J. This is a criminal case in which the defendant was charged with the offense of being an ex-convict in possession of a firearm. ORS 166.270.1 He was found guilty after a trial to the comb. The sole issue on his appeal is whether the trial court erred in refusing to consider the "choice of evils” defense, ORS 161.200, in assessing the evidence presented at trial. We reverse and remand

Order It is ordered that this cause be remanded to the Superior Court, Richmond County for an evidentiary hearing on defendant’s motion for appropriate relief on the ground that evidence has become available which was unknown to defendant at the time of the trial. The Clerk of Superior Court, Richmond County, is directed to forthwith bring this matter before any superior court judge presently holding court in the district for the purpose

276 S.E.2d 693 (1981) STATE of North Carolina v. John Eddie BURNEY. No. 48. Supreme Court of North Carolina. April 7, 1981. *694 Atty. Gen. Rufus L. Edmisten by Asst. Atty. Gen. J. Chris Prather, Raleigh, for the state. Richard G. Buckner, Rockingham, for defendant-appellant. BRITT, Justice. By his first assi

23 Kan. App.2d 394 (1997) 931 P.2d 26 LARRY W. BURNEY, Appellee, v. KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL AND REHABILITATION SERVICES, Appellant. No. 75,228. Court of Appeals of Kansas. Opinion filed January 17, 1997. *395 Matthew W. Boddington, of Kansas Department of Social and Rehabilitation Services, of T

This appeal involves like proceedings in each of the above named suits, one brought by James Williams against Lee R. Wright and W. H. Burney and the other brought by Lottie Martin against Lee R. Wright and W. H. Burney. The proceedings had below were identical and, therefore, the rulings here in one appeal will govern the other. We will deal with the Williams case, in which the defendants were sued by reason of injuries received by the plaintiff while a passenger in a taxicab, resultin

This is a bill in equity seeking relief from a foreclosure sale of real estate situated in the city of Providence. The cause is before us on the complainant's appeal from a decree dismissing the bill. An expert witness testified that the value of the real estate was $2,200. The amount due on the mortgage was $500 plus interest for a *Page 424 short period. The property was knocked down to respondent Burney for $850. The complainant does not contend that t

STONE, C. J. Defendant was indicted under section 3784, Code of 1886, for receiving and concealing stolen money, knowing it to be stolen, and “not having the intent to restore it to the owner.” The money was alleged to have been stolen from Sikes,'about Christmas, 1887. An accomplice was the witness by whom the most important criminating facts were proved. Another witness, Coskrey, was examined, with a view of corroborating the te

PER CURIAM. In San Antonio what was known as the Conroy Building was situated on the north end of the 100 block of North Alamo. Street. The remainder of the block was occupied by the main building of a department store operated by Joske Bros.. Company, a corporation, to be hereinafter-called “Joslce,” for convenience. The two. buildings, both owned by Joske, were separate but connected structures and Joske’s. store occupied

320 Ga. 882 FINAL COPY S24A1301. THE STATE v. FLOWERS. LAGRUA, Justice. Napoleon Flowers was indicted for murder, aggravated assault, cruelty to children, and related charges, for firing multiple shots at Jim Johnson, in the vicinity of other adults and a child. Johnson was fatally wounded.1 Flowers claimed self-defense. Before trial, the State moved to admit2 evidence of six other acts which Flowers allegedly committed, pursuant to OCGA § 24-4- 404 (

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 24-1102 ___________________________ United States of America Plaintiff - Appellee v. David Michael Woods Defendant - Appel

[Cite as State v. Perry, 2021-Ohio-2183.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LAKE COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, CASE NO. 2021-L-005 Plaintiff-Appellee, Criminal Appeal from the -v- Court of Common Pleas CLARENCE A. PERRY,

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER OF COURT RE: APPLICABILITY OF PRESIDENT OBAMA’S NOVEMBER 20, 2014 EXECUTIVE ACTION ON IMMIGRATION TO , THIS DEFENDANT ARTHUR J. SCHWAB, District Judge. On November 20, 2014, President Obama announced an Executive Action on immigration, which will affect approximately four million undocumented immigrants who are unlawfully present in the United

McFadden, Presiding Judge. After a jury trial, John C. Neale III was convicted of three counts of child molestation. On appeal, he argues that the three counts merge, but the counts were based on separate conduct so they do not merge. Neale argues that the trial court erred by admitting other acts evidence, but he has not shown that the trial court abused his discretion in determining that the admittedly prejudicial nature of the ev

NOTICE: This opinion is subject to modification resulting from motions for reconsideration under Supreme Court Rule 27, the Court’s reconsideration, and editorial revisions by the Reporter of Decisions. The version of the opinion published in the Advance Sheets for the Georgia Reports, designated as the “Final Copy,” will replace any prior version on the Court’s website and docket. A bound volume of the Georgia Reports will contain the final and official text of the opin