Cases

LOGAN, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff R. Chris Puckett appeals the district court’s judgment affirming the Secretary’s decision denying plaintiffs application for social security disability benefits. The principal issue on appeal is whether plaintiffs difficulty in repairing or replacing a prosthesis for his leg qualifies as a stump complication or its equivalent under 20 C.F.R. pt. 4

ORDER ON CLASS CERTIFICATION AND SUMMARY JUDGMENT McKINNEY, District Judge. Burke and Justin Andre, by their mother and next friend, Doris Andre, brought this action on their own behalf and on behalf of all others similarly situated pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 23(b)(2).2 The proposed class action seeks declaratory and injunctive relief against Shirley S. Chater, Commi

RALPH G. THOMPSON, District Judge. Claimant Ray Marshall appeals the district court’s affirmance of the decision by the Secretary of Health and Human Services reopening claimant’s March 8, 1988 eligibility determination for blind benefits, terminating his benefits upon a finding that he engaged in substantial gainful activity in 1986, and authorizing recovery of the amounts over

MEMORANDUM OPINION WOLIN, District Judge. Plaintiff Antonio Brando (“Brando”) brought this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (1996) for review of the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (the “Commissioner”) denying Brando’s application for disability insurance benefits. Brando alleges that Administrative Law Judge “ALJ” Frederick Harap’s (“Harap”) decision was not supporte

970 F.Supp. 1440 (1997) Larry B. STANFIELD, Plaintiff, v. Shirley S. CHATER, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. No. 1:95 CV 103 DDN. United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, Southeastern Division. April 11, 1997. *1441 *1442 *1443 Eileen Kinney

921 F.Supp. 631 (1996) Robert C. SLYCORD, Plaintiff, v. Shirley S. CHATER, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. No. C 95-4075. United States District Court, N.D. Iowa, Western Division. March 26, 1996. *632 Jeffrey A. Neary, O'Brien, Galvin, Moeller, Neary & Flannery, Sioux City, Iowa, for plaintiff Robert Slycord.

78 F.3d 597 NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995, or further order. Ric

348 Mass. 237 (1964) 202 N.E.2d 805 AUGUSTA T. CHATER, trustee, vs. BOARD OF APPEALS OF MILTON. Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts, Norfolk. October 6, 1964. December 9, 1964. Present: WILKINS, C.J., SPALDING, WHITTEMORE, CUTTER, KIRK, SPIEGEL, & REARDON, JJ. Robert D. O'Leary for the plaintiff. John J. Murray

ENTRY ON JUDICIAL REVIEW LARRY J. McKINNEY, JUDGE Plaintiff. Harold W. Turner requests judicial review of the final decision of Defendant Nancy A. Berryhill, Acting Commissioner of Social Security (the “Commissioner”), who denied Turner’s applications for Disability Insurance-Benefits (“DIB”) and Supplemental Security Income ■ (“SSI”) benefits under titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §

MEMORANDUM ** Lander McCalmon (“McCalmon”) was initially found disabled as of February 5, 2002 because of aortic valvular heart disease. In July 2004, McCalmon was notified that the Social Security Administration (“SSA”) had determined that his disability ceased on May 1, 2004, and his benefits were terminated. An ALJ found that McCalmon’s condition had medically improved after he underwent surgery for aort

MEMORANDUM ** Lander McCalmon (“McCalmon”) was initially found disabled as of February 5, 2002 because of aortic valvular heart disease. In July 2004, McCalmon was notified that the Social Security Administration (“SSA”) had determined that his disability ceased on May 1, 2004, and his benefits were terminated. An ALJ found that McCalmon’s condition had medically improved after he underwent surgery for aort

ORDER REVERSING DISABILITY DECISION AND REMANDING TO COMMISSIONER Blackburn, District Judge The matter before me is plaintiff’s Complaint [# 1], filed December 19, 2012, *1347seeking review of the Commissioner’s decision denying plaintiffs claim for disability insurance' benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 401, e

780 F.Supp.2d 144 (2011) Jose GONCALVES, Plaintiff, v. Michael J. ASTRUE, Defendant. Civil Action No. 10-10518-JLT. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. May 2, 2011. *145 Michael J. Kelley, Law Office of Michael J. Kelley, Boston, MA, for Plaintiff. Eve A. Piemonte-Stacey, U.S. Attorney's Office, Boston, MA, for

BURKE, Judge. Willie B. Smith III appeals the circuit court’s denial of his Rule 32, Ala. R.Crim. P., petition for postconviction relief challenging his May 7, 1992, conviction of two counts of capital murder and the resulting sentence of death. Smith was convicted of the intentional murder of Sharma Ruth Johnson during a kidnapping, § 13A-5-40(a)(1), Ala.Code 1975, and the intentional murder of Sharma Ruth Johnson during a

FINDING OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW MARGARET M. MORROW, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Plaintiff Stephanie Shaw filed this action on October 14, 2014, against Life Insurance Company of North America (“LINA”).1 Shaw alleges that she was denied long-term disability benefits to which she was entitled under a disability benefit plan (the “Plan”) established by her former employer

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Jeffrey Cole, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE The plaintiff, Gerald Ray, seeks review of the final decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration denying his application for Disability Insurancé Benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 423(d)(2). Mr. Ray asks the court to reverse and remand the Commissioner’s decision, while the Commis

GABRIEL W. GORENSTEIN, United States Magistrate Judge Plaintiff Frank Perozzi, Jr., brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for judicial review of the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (the "Commissioner") denying his claim for disability benefits under the Social Security Act. Both par

ORDER AND JUDGMENT ** JOHN C. PORFILIO, Circuit Judge. After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously to grant the parties’ request for a decision on the briefs without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(f); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is t

MEMORANDUM*** Hee Soon Yun (“Yun”) appeals the district court’s order affirming the Social Security Administration Commissioner’s decision denying her disability benefits and insurance. *300We review de novo a district court’s decision upholding the Commissioner’s denial of benefits. Moore v. Comm’r of the Soc. Sec. Admin., </

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER IRMA CARRILLO RAMIREZ, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Pursuant to the consent of the parties and the order of reassignment dated September 2, 2014 (doc. 15), this case has been transferred for the conduct of all further proceedings and the entry of judgment. Based on the relevant filings, evidence, and applicable law, the Commissioner’s decision is REVERSED, and the c