Cases

OPINION & ORDER JAMES D. PETERSON, District Judge. Plaintiff, Monroe Truck Equipment, Inc., owns U.S. Patent No. 8,596,376, for an apparatus for mounting a wing plow to a vehicle. Plaintiff contends that defendant, Universal Truck Equipment, Inc., infringes the '376 patent with its Uni-Glide mounts. Defendant denies infringement and contends that the '376 patent is invalid under 35- U.S.C. §

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE DEBORAH PETTRY and GAIL ) FRIEDT, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2020-0132-KSJM ) GILEAD SCIENCES, INC., ) ) Defendant. ) ) ) RICHARD C. COLLINS, )

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE DEBORAH PETTRY and GAIL ) FRIEDT, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2020-0132-KSJM ) GILEAD SCIENCES, INC., ) ) Defendant. ) ) ) RICHARD C. COLLINS, )

FILED UNDER SEAL MEMORANDUM OPINION STARK, United States District Judge: Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Intellectual Property GmbH, and Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc. (collectively, “Bayer” or “Plaintiffs”) allege that Watson Laboratories, Inc. (“Watson” or “Defendant”) infringes United States Patent No. 8,071,577 (“the ’577 patent” or “the patent-in-suit”). (D.I. 1) The ’577 patent rel

Murray v Stone (2024 NY Slip Op 04611) Murray v Stone 2024 NY Slip Op 04611 Decided on September 26, 2024 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

Black v Phoenix Cayman Ltd. (2024 NY Slip Op 00797) Black v Phoenix Cayman Ltd. 2024 NY Slip Op 00797 Decided on February 15, 2024 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary L

Black v Phoenix Cayman Ltd. (2024 NY Slip Op 00797) Black v Phoenix Cayman Ltd. 2024 NY Slip Op 00797 Decided on February 15, 2024 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary L

Bangladesh Bank v Rizal Commercial Banking Corp. (2024 NY Slip Op 01112) Bangladesh Bank v Rizal Commercial Banking Corp. 2024 NY Slip Op 01112 Decided on February 29, 2024 Appellate Division, First Department PITT-BURKE, J.

*696 KANNE, Circuit Judge. Appellants Frank Burks and Cornelius Jones were, at the relevant times, employed by the Union Pacific Railroad Company (“Union Pacific”). They claim that Union Pacific denied them the opportunity to take a test that was required for promotion, and did so based on impermissible r

*1300 EBEL, Circuit Judge. Defendants-Appellants William Pickard and Clyde Apperson appeal the district court’s décision to deny their motion to unseal the Drug Enforcement Administration (“DEA”)’s file on one of its confidential informants. Having jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, we conclude the dist

JODI F. JAYNE, MAGISTRATE JUDGE Before the Court is the Motion of Eugene Volokh ("Volokh") (1) to Intervene, (2) Unseal Record Documents, (3) to File *1145Via CM/ECF, and (4) to Consider this Motion on an Expedited Basis ("Motion to Intervene and Unseal") (ECF No. 58), which was referred by United States District Judge John Dowdell.

Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest to the Illinois Official Reports accuracy and integrity of this

OPINION AND ORDER SARA L. ELLIS, United States District Judge After Plaintiff John Petersen was found permanently unable to perform his job as a firefighter/paramedic at the Great Lakes Naval Base (“Great Lakes”), the Department of the Navy (the “Navy”) reassigned him to a dispatch supervisor position. Unhappy with his treatment, Petersen filed suit against Defendant Ray Mabus, Secretary of the N