Cases

Maryland Department of Health v. Suzanne Best, No. 1279, September Term 2023. Opinion by Ripken, J. SUFFICIENCY OF THE EVIDENCE – RETALIATION – PROTECTED OPPOSITIONAL ACTIVITY To support a claim of retaliation under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 or Title 20 of the Maryland State Government Article based on protected oppositional activity, evidence must demonstrate that the protected oppositional activity was made on the basis of race or some other protected status or class. Where the

Maryland Department of Health v. Shawn Orland Myers, Jr., et al., Nos. 1901, 2074, 2150, 2162, 2163, 2280, 2281, 2283, 2284, 2286, 2287, 2288, 2289, 2290, September Term, 2022. Opinion by Graeff, J. CONSTRUCTIVE CIVIL CONTEMPT — STATUTORY SANCTIONS — DUE PROCESS Where the court finds an individual to be incompetent to stand trial (“IST”) and dangerous and commits the individual to the Maryland Department of Health (the “Department”) with an order to admit the defendant to a designated health f

436 So.2d 356 (1983) Lee Ann BURGESS, Appellant, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE and department of Administration, Appellees. No. AP-426. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. August 16, 1983. Rehearing Denied September 12, 1983. Edward S. Jaffry and Fred O. Dickinson, III, of Horne, Rhodes, Jaffry & Horne, Tallahassee, for appe

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA January 2015 Term FILED _____________ May 13, 2015 released at 3:00 p.m. No. 14-0428 RORY L. PERRY II, CLERK SUPREME COURT OF APPEA

148 P.3d 1029 (2006) Alice ONGOM, Petitioner, v. STATE of Washington, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, OFFICE OF PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS, Respondent. No. 76618-5. Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc. December 14, 2006. Claudia Kilbreath, Short Cressman & Burgess PLLC, Seattle, WA, for Petitioner. Christopher George Swanson, Washington State Dept of Health, Maureen A

ACCEPTED 15-25-00148-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 9/22/2025 2:20 PM No. 15-25-00148-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE

700 So.2d 1129 (1997) Patricia EDWARDS, et al. v. Joseph BURGESS, et al. No. 96-CA-2064. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit. October 1, 1997. *1130 William J. Perry, Russell Stegeman, Stegeman & Associates, Gretna, for Plaintiffs/Appellants. Iris A. Tate, Wilkerson, Tate & Williams, New Orleans, for Defen

618 S.E.2d 201 (2005) 359 N.C. 782 Reginald NEWBERNE v. DEPARTMENT OF CRIME CONTROL AND PUBLIC SAFETY, an agency of the State of North Carolina, Division of State Highway Patrol, a principal sub-unit of an agency of the State of North Carolina, Bryan E. Beatty, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Department of Crime Control and Public Safety, Richard W. Holden, in his official capacity as Commanding Officer of the

Filed 12/29/23 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE STATE OF CALIFORNIA GROSSMONT UNION HIGH SCHOOL D080295 DISTRICT, Plaintiff and Appellant, (Super. Ct. No. 37-2015- v. 00033720-CU-WM-CTL) DIEGO PLUS EDUCATION CORPORATION et al.,

Opinion LAVERY, C. J. The defendants1 in this declaratory judgment action appeal from the trial court’s rendering of summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff, the board of education of the town and borough of Naugatuck (board of education), following the court’s determination that two recent amendments to the borough’s municipal charter were invalid. The defendants clai

675 S.E.2d 641 (2009) NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION; Theodis Beck, Secretary of the North Carolina Department of Correction, in his official capacity; and Gerald J. Branker, Warden of Central Prison, in his official capacity v. NORTH CAROLINA MEDICAL BOARD. No. 51PA08. Supreme Court of North Carolina. May 1, 2009. *643

104 P.3d 29 (2005) Alice ONGOM, Appellant, v. STATE of Washington, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, OFFICE OF PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS, Respondent. No. 52688-0-I. Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1. January 3, 2005. *30 Claudia Kilbreath, Short, Cressman & Burgess, Sea., WA, for Appellant. Chris G. Swanson, Attorney General

PER CURIAM. The Department of Education (DOED) appeals from an order of the district court, published at Hurst v. United States Dep’t of Educ., 695 F.Supp. 1137 (D.Kan.1988), granting plaintiff summary judgment on DOED’s counterclaim for the balance due on plaintiff’s defaulted student loan. The district court’s concomitant ruling, granting DOED summary judgm

OPINION OF THE COURT ADAMS, Circuit Judge. The State of New Jersey asks us to review a final decision of the Secretary of Education that New Jersey refund over $1 million granted by the federal government under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (ESEA), 20 U.S.C. § 241a et seq. (1976). These funds had been a

163 N.J. Super. 389 (1978) 394 A.2d 1240 TOWNSHIP OF PRINCETON, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. BOROUGH OF NATIONAL PARK ET AL., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. GATEWAY REGIONAL BOARD OF EDUCATION, BOROUGH OF WESTVILLE ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. BOROUGH OF GIBBSBORO ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,

472 F.Supp.2d 1304 (2007) Raymond Lance BRIGGS, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Kelsey Shelton Smith-Briggs, deceased, Plaintiff, v. The State of OKLAHOMA ex rel. The OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES et al., Defendants. No. CIV-06-677-M. United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma. January 31, 2007. *13

Opinion BORDEN, J. The principal issue in this certified appeal is whether a dispute regarding the legality of certain provisions of the town charter of the named defendant, the town and borough of Naugatuck, was rendered moot as a result of subsequent amendments to the charter. In general terms, the provisions at issue concerned the service of the mayor on the plaintiff board of education of the tow

664 S.E.2d 541 (2008) Bernard J. FOLIO and Grandeotto, Inc., Plaintiffs Below, Appellants, v. HARRISON-CLARKSBURG HEALTH DEPT., et al., Defendants Below, Appellees. No. 33707. Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia. Submitted April 16, 2008. Decided June 17, 2008. *542 Jerry Blair, Jr., Esquire, Blair, Conner

184 F.Supp.2d 466 (2002) CM, a minor by and through her parents JM and EM, and on their own behalf, Plaintiffs, v. THE BOARD OF PUBLIC EDUCATION OF HENDERSON COUNTY a/k/a Henderson County Schools; Dan G. Lunsford, Ed.D., Superintendent; Linda R. Hawk, Chairman; Jackie H. Hornsby, Vice Chairman; Ervin W. Bazzle; Brenda O. Brock; Allen A. Combs; Thomas E. Orr; Thomas B. Pryor; and Judy Diane Hartman Cook, in their official and individual capacities

792 So.2d 419 (2000) REYNOLDS METALS COMPANY v. STATE DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS et al. 2990830 to 2990838. Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama. September 15, 2000. Certiorari Denied February 16, 2001. *420 William F. Gardner and Joseph V. Musso of Cabaniss, Johnston, Gardner, Dumas & O'Neal, Birmingham