⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

5 opinions for “Burdeen Smith”

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2007-10-02 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs July 10, 2007 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. DONTAE LAMONT BROWN Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lauderdale County No. 7923 Joseph H. Walker, III, Judge No. W2006-01800-CCA-R3-CD - Filed October 2, 2007 A Lauderdale County Circuit Court jury convicted the appellant, Dontae L
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2018-09-28 · Published · cited 3× · 194 A.3d 444; 239 Md. App. 50
Panel: Nazarian, Leahy, Peter B. Krauser (Senior Judge, Specially Assigned), JJ. Nazarian, J. *52 I've got clean away but I'll be back some day, just the combination will have changed Someday they'll catch me, to a chain they'll attach me, but 'til that day I'll ri
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2018-09-28 · Published · cited 0×
Aaron Bradds & Samuel Hill v. Dionne Randolph, Warden, Nos. 77 & 78, September Term 2018. Opinion by Nazarian, J. BAIL REVIEW – REVISIONS TO MARYLAND RULES 2-416 AND 2-416.1 Pursuant to revised Maryland Rules 2-416 and 2-416.1, reviewing courts must determine first whether defendants represent a flight risk or a danger to victims, others, or society. If so, they must be held pending trial. If not, they must be released, subject to appropriate conditions. The court should impose the least onero
District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2012-12-12 · Published · cited 20× · 912 F. Supp. 2d 671; 2012 WL 6189013; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 175622
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER VIRGINIA M. KENDALL, District Judge. Plaintiff Guaranteed Rate, Inc. (“Guaranteed Rate”) filed this suit against twenty-six individuals and entities (collectively “Defendants”), alleging that Defendants conspired to defraud Guaranteed Rate in connection with the sale of real estate at a condominium development in Chicago, Illinois, known as Vision on State (“the Deve
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2022-07-29 · Published · cited 0×
USCA11 Case: 18-13894 Date Filed: 07/29/2022 Page: 1 of 142 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 18-13894 ____________________ RAY CHARLES SCHULTZ, et al., Plaintiffs, BRADLEY HESTER,