Cases

[Cite as Scott v. Ford, 2021-Ohio-208.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOHN J. SCOTT, : Plaintiff-Appellant, : No. 109414 v. : SARCHIONE FORD, : Defendant-Appellee. :

SELYA, Circuit Judge. This habeas case presents both procedural and substantive quandaries. Procedurally, we must determine the effect of a district court’s grant of a certificate of appealability on some, but not all, of the issues that a habeas petitioner seeks to pursue. Substantively, we must determine whether the petitioner has shown legal cause for us to set aside his state

985 F.Supp. 219 (1997) Tam S. BUI, Petitioner, v. Paul DiPAOLO, Superintendent of the Massachusetts Correctional Institution at Norfolk, and Scott Harshbarger, Attorney General of the Commonwealth, Respondents. No. CIV. A. 96-12615-RCL. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. December 23, 1997. *220

TJOFLAT, Circuit Judge: Petitioner in this case, an Alabama prison inmate, seeks a writ of habeas corpus setting aside his 1986 murder conviction. The United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama denied the writ, rejecting, among other claims, 1 petitioner’s assertion that the Montgomery County Dist

529 F.3d 818 (2008) Viola SCOTT, On Behalf of Absalom SCOTT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael J. ASTRUE, Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Defendant-Appellee. No. 07-1796. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: January 17, 2008. Filed: June 23, 2008. *819 Eugene Gregory Wallace, arg

321 F.3d 1304 Quang BUI, Petitioner-Appellant,v.Michael HALEY, Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections, et al., Respondents-Appellees. No. 00-15445. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. February 19, 2003. COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED Randall Scott Susskind (Court-Appointed), Equal Justice Iniative of Alabama,

ORDER After a plea of guilty to possession of a firearm by a felon, 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1), Rickey Scott was sentenced as an armed career criminal to 15 years in prison, id. § 924(e). On appeal, he argues only that *549the district court should not have turned to § 924(e) for his sentence, because his prior convictions do not qualify as violent felonies. Accordingly, he

*1005Opinion RIVERA, J. Defendant Phong Bui appeals a judgment entered upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of attempted murder (Pen. Code,1 §§ 187, 664, subd. (a)), mayhem (§ 203), first degree residential robbery (§§ 211, 212.5, subd. (a)), and first degree residential burglary (§§ 459, 460, subd. (a)). He contends on ap

Opinion MÁRQUEZ, J. When a lawsuit enforces “an important right affecting the public interest” and the statutory criteria under section 1021.5 of the Code of Civil Procedure are satisfied, a private litigant may recover his or her attorney fees. 1 One criterion under section 1021.5 is that private

[Cite as Scott v. Scott, 2022-Ohio-1052.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COLUMBIANA COUNTY DALE SCOTT, ET AL., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. STEVEN A. SCOTT, Defendan

Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed September 29, 2022. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-21-00077-CV CHRISTOPHER SCOTT, Appellant V. BARBARA JUNE SCOTT, Appellee On Appeal from the 507th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause N

Filed 7/30/25 CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE CAROL WIMBER et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, G064170 v. (Super. Ct. No. 30-2022-01291272) ALAN SCOTT et al., OPINION Defendants and Respondents.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA No. COA24-376 Filed 3 September 2025 Mecklenburg County, Nos. 17CRS 202152-590, 17CRS202154-590 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. SHALOME SCOTT, Defendant. Appeal by defendant from judgment entered 2 June 2023 by Judge Matt Osman in Superior Court, Mecklenburg County. Heard in the Court of Appeals 13 February 2025. Attorney General Jeff Jackson,

[Cite as Gadson v. Scott, 2025-Ohio-7.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA IVAN E. GADSON, : Plaintiff- Appellee, : No. 113740 v. : KIMBERLY R. SCOTT,

[Cite as Garg v. Scott, 2024-Ohio-1595.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA ANUP GARG, ET AL., : Relators, : No. 113583 v. : HONORABLE W. MONA SCOTT, JUDGE,

People v Scott (2023 NY Slip Op 04618) People v Scott 2023 NY Slip Op 04618 Decided on September 14, 2023 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

[Cite as State v. Scott, 2024-Ohio-975.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA STATE OF OHIO, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 112325 v. : DAMARION SCOTT, :

USCA1 Opinion United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 98-1312 TAM S. BUI, Petitioner, Appellant, v. PAUL DIPAOLO, ET AL., Respondents, Appellees. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DIS

NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX 29-JUL-2022 07:57 AM Dkt. 51 SO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA RICKY SCOTT, individually and on behalf of the General Public of the District of Columbia, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 23-475 (RDM) v. APPLE INC., Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff Ricky Scott brings this putative class action against Defendant Ap