Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
19 opinions for “Buhler v. Allstate Insurance Company”
Ortega-Maldonado v. Allstate Insurancepublic domain
519 F.Supp.2d 981 (2007) Veronica ORTEGA-MALDONADO, as assignee of the claims of Maria Guitterrez and Genoveva Manzanarez, Plaintiff, v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. Civ. No. 06-461 (PJS/RLE). United States District Court, D. Minnesota. September 12, 2007. *982 *983
Allstate Life Insurance v. Robert W. Baird & Co.public domain
756 F.Supp.2d 1113 (2010) ALLSTATE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. ROBERT W. BAIRD & CO., INC., et. al., Defendants. Ronald Covin, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Robert W. Baird & Co., Inc., et al., Defendants. Nos. CV-09-8162-PCT-GMS, CV-09-8174-PCT-GMS. United States District Court, D. Arizona. November 4, 2010. *112
Reeder v. Allstate Insurance Companypublic domain
235 So.2d 111 (1970) James W. REEDER, Individually and as the Administrator of his Unemancipated Minor Son, Charles Reeder v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY and Tiger Mix Concrete Company, Inc. No. 3934. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit. May 4, 1970. Rehearing Denied June 1, 1970. Writ Refused June 29, 1970.
(2008) UNIVERSAL UNDERWRITERS INSURANCE COMPANY, a Kansas corporation, Plaintiff, v. ABE'S WRECKER SERVICE, INC., a Florida corporation, James T. Scheider, an individual, Maria Teresa Abella, personal representative of the Estate of Paola A. Abella, and Sandra Vera, personal representative of the Estate of William H. Bengoa-Torres, a/k/a William H. Bengoa, Defendants. No. 3:04-CV-1216-J-12TEM. United S
Jones v. IDS Prop. Cas. Ins. Co.public domain
Duarte, J. *358*628When a wife sues for loss of consortium after her husband is seriously injured in an automobile accident that is the defendant's fault, is her claim subject to the same per person limit of the defendant's insurance policy as her husband'
Jones v. IDS Property Casualty Ins. Co.public domain
Filed 9/25/18 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT (Amador) ---- MARK ALAN JONES et al., C084065 Plaintiffs and Appellants, (Super. Ct. No. 14-CV-
Schindler, J. The trial court denied insurer Underwriters at Lloyd’s (Lloyd’s) motion to vacate a default judgment entered against it in favor of its insured, Professional Marine Company (PMC).1 Lloyd’s appeals the trial court’s decision and argues that Lloyd’s is not a legal entity and cannot be sued, service was improper, and because it had informally appeared, the judgment must be set aside. Lloyd’
Eisen v. Venulum Ltd.public domain
DECISION AND ORDER ELIZABETH A. WOLFORD, United States District Judge I. Introduction Bernard M. Eisen (“Plaintiff’), a citizen and resident of New York, filed this action on June 8, 2016, claiming violations of both the Securities Act of 1933 (“the ’33 Act”) and the Securities Act of 1934 (“the ’34 Act”), and related state-law claims of un-conscionability, fraud, civil conspiracy, and
Don-Rick, Inc. v. QBE Americaspublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER STEPHEN L. CROCKER, United States Magistrate Judge. In this removal action for breach of contract, plaintiff Don-Rick, Inc. alleges that defendant QBE failed to pay contingent sales commissions for insurance products that Don-Rick sold on behalf of QBE. On September 16, 2013, QBE moved to dismiss the complaint under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim, claiming that QBE ha
Edwards v. POWDER MOUNTAIN WATER AND SEWERpublic domain
214 P.3d 120 (2009) 2009 UT App 185 Bruce EDWARDS, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. POWDER MOUNTAIN WATER AND SEWER; Alvin Cobabe; Jamie Lythgoe; Jamie Lythgoe dba Powder Mountain Water and Sewer; June Cobabe; Chuck Panter; Joann Panter; Susan Lowther; Lavar Lowther; Ray W. Moss; Merlin J. Tomlinson; Elery Voge; Clair Van Meeterren; Wayne Stokes; Kim Remmash; Julie Batchelor; Powder Mountain, Inc.; Powder Mountain West Landowne
¶ 1. HRUZ, J. In this tax incremental financing (TIF) dispute, Voters with Facts, four limited liability companies, and fourteen individual plaintiffs (collectively, "Voters") appeal a dismissal on the pleadings granted in favor of the City of Eau Claire (the "City") and the City of Eau Claire Joint Review Board (the "Review Board").1 Voters sought a judgment declaring unlawful
Able v. Vulcan Materials Co.public domain
KUHN, J. 14Plaintiffs-appellants, Leslie Dillon and his major children, April and Matthew, (collectively the Dillons), appeal the trial court’s judgment entered in conformity with a jury verdict awarding $5,225.00 in general and special damages to Leslie Dillon against defendants, Vulcan Materials Company (Vulcan) and Industrial Coating Contractors, Inc. (ICC) for his exposure to a chemical release, which occurred at the Vulca
PMC v. Those Certain Underwriters at Lloyd'spublic domain
77 P.3d 658 (2003) PROFESSIONAL MARINE COMPANY, Albany Insurance Company, Fireman's Fund Insurance Company, Lorraine Johnson, Respondent. v. THOSE CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S, London, each for his/her own part and not for one another, severally subscribing Policy No. VM0000122-00, Defendant/Respondent. No. 50804-1-I. Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1. October 13, 2
United States ex rel. Tennessee Valley Authority v. An Easement & Right-of-Way Over 6.09 Acres of Landpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER JOHN E. OTT, Chief United' States Magistrate Judge Acting upon the relation and for the use of the Tennessee Valley Authority (“TVA”), the United States (hereinafter the “Government”) filed these two condemnation actions pursuant to Fed, R. Civ. P. 71.1 and the Tennessee Valley Authority Act of 1933, as amended, 16 U.S.C. § 831-831ee. In connection therewith, the
517 F.Supp. 583 (1981) EASTON AREA JOINT SEWER AUTHORITY v. BUSHKILL-LOWER LEHIGH JOINT SEWER AUTHORITY, Bushkill Township, Plainfield Township, Palmer Township, Upper Nazareth Township, Borough of Tatamy and Borough of Stockertown v. Jack J. SCHRAMM and Gilbert Common wealth Engineers/Consultants. No. 81-1802. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. July 1, 19
ACCEPTED 03-15-00293-CV 8312780 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS
Beneke v. Weickpublic domain
PER CURIAM. On March 9, 1956, the United States filed a condemnation suit in the District Court for the Northern District of Ohio against forty-six defendants owning twenty-three separate parcels of land aggregating 44.314 acres. On October 1, 1959, the District Judge entered an order appointing Commissioners to determine the issue of just compensation as to all defendants, overruling objections on the part of persons having an
Bailey v. Toddpublic domain
126 Ga. App. 731 (1972) 191 S.E.2d 547 BAILEY v. TODD. 47209. Court of Appeals of Georgia. Argued May 24, 1972. Decided July 7, 1972. Rehearing Denied July 20, 1972. *743 G. Seals Aiken, for appellant. Henning, Chambers & Mabry, Edward J. Henning, Pete
275 F.2d 38 Elmer H. BENEKE and Mildred Beneke, Louis M. Hansen and Marie Hansen, Marian C. Weber, Marian C. Weber, Executrix of the Estate of Carl D. Weber, deceased, Henry DiFiore, and Gertrude DiFiore, Petitioners,v.Honorable Paul C. WEICK, United States Circuit Judge, sitting by assignment in Cause No. 32609 as District Judge of Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division, in U. S. A. v. Certain Interests in Land aggregating 44.314 acre