Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
6 opinions for “Buffin v. City and County of San Francisco”
Riana Buffin v. City & County of San Franciscopublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT RIANA BUFFIN; CRYSTAL No. 20-15518 PATTERSON, Plaintiffs-Appellees, D.C. No. 4:15-cv-04959- and YGR CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO; PAUL MIYAMOTO, OPINION Sheriff, Defendants-Appellees, Vv. STATE OF CALIFORNIA; ROB BONTA, Defendants-Appellants, and CALIFORNIA BAIL AGENTS ASSOCIATION, Intervenor-Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Yvonne Gonzalez Roge
Odonnell v. Harris Countypublic domain
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION Lee H. Rosenthal, Chief United States District Judge The plaintiffs, Maranda Lynn ODonnell, Robert Ryan Ford, and Loetha McGruder, sued under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, challenging Harris County’s postarrest detention policies. They alleged that the Harris County Sheriff and sixteen Harris .County Criminal Courts at Law Judges promulgate policies that violate the Equal Protection and Due Proces
Welchen v. Cnty. of Sacramentopublic domain
Troy L. Nunley, United States District Judge This matter is before the Court pursuant to Defendant County of Sacramento, ("County") Defendant Scott Jones, in his official capacity as Sacramento County Sheriff, ("Sheriff") and Defendant Kamala Harris's, in her official capacity as the California Attorney General, ("AG") (collectively "Defendants") Motions to Dismiss. (ECF No. 35; ECF No. 36.) Plaintiff Gary Wayne Welchen, et al. ("Pl
Erick Arevalo v. Vicki Hennessypublic domain
FILED FOR PUBLICATION FEB 9 2018 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ERICK AREVALO, No. 17-17545
People v. Financial Casualty & Suretypublic domain
Filed 5/17/21 Reposted - published opinion CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FOUR THE PEOPLE, B297049 (Los Angeles County Plaintiff and Respondent, Super. Ct. No. OSJ2146) v. FINANCIAL CASU
Mark Habelt v. Irhythm Technologies, Inc.public domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MARK HABELT, individually and on No. 22-15660 behalf of all others similarly situated, D.C. No. 3:21-cv- Plaintiff-Appellant, * 00776-EMC and PUBLIC EMPLOYEES’ OPINION RETI