Cases

PER CURIAM: Thomas Scott Henry appeals the district court’s decision affirming the Social Security Administration’s denial of his application for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. On appeal, Henry argues that the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) erred by (1) refusing to give pr

OPINION LIPEZ, Circuit Judge. Claimant Ronald Miller seeks review of a denial of his application for Social Security benefits. On remand from the Appeals Council, an administrative law judge (ALJ) determined that Miller was' not disabled within the meaning of the Social Security Act and therefore did not qualify for benefits. Miller appealed the decision

*********** The undersigned have reviewed the prior Opinion and Award based upon the record of the proceedings before Deputy Commissioner Harris and the briefs and arguments of the parties. The appealing party has not shown good ground to reconsider the evidence, receive further evidence, rehear the parties or their representatives, and having reviewed the competent evidence of record, the Full Commission adopts the Opinion and Award of Deputy C

NOTICE: All slip opinions and orders are subject to formal revision and are superseded by the advance sheets and bound volumes of the Official Reports. If you find a typographical error or other formal error, please notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Judicial Court, John Adams Courthouse, 1 Pemberton Square, Suite 2500, Boston, MA, 02108-1750; (617) 557- 1030; SJCReporter@sjc.state.ma.us SJC-13798 ESTATE OF CAROLINE H. WALSH vs. COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE. Suffolk. D

NOTICE: All slip opinions and orders are subject to formal revision and are superseded by the advance sheets and bound volumes of the Official Reports. If you find a typographical error or other formal error, please notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Judicial Court, John Adams Courthouse, 1 Pemberton Square, Suite 2500, Boston, MA, 02108-1750; (617) 557- 1030; SJCReporter@sjc.state.ma.us SJC-12935 STEPHEN FOSTER1 & others2 vs. COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION & other

HOLLOWAY, Chief Judge. Ben Klein (Klein) appeals the Tax Court’s decision sustaining deficiencies in income tax and civil fraud penalties under 26 U.S.C. § 6653(b) (1982) for the years 1966-1970. The Tax Court held that Klein’s 1973 conviction under 26 U.S.C. § 7201, for evading taxes from 1966-1970, collaterally estopped him from denying civil fraud for those same years.

NOTICE: All slip opinions and orders are subject to formal revision and are superseded by the advance sheets and bound volumes of the Official Reports. If you find a typographical error or other formal error, please notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Judicial Court, John Adams Courthouse, 1 Pemberton Square, Suite 2500, Boston, MA, 02108-1750; (617) 557- 1030; SJCReporter@sjc.state.ma.us SJC-13439 IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF FRANCES R. MASON. Barnstable. September

SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT CARE AND PROTECTION OF EVE.[1] Docket: SJC-13672 Dates: February 7, 2025 - May 15, 2025 Present: Bu

SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT ATTORNEY GENERAL vs. TOWN OF MILTON & another;[1] EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF HOUSING AND LIVABLE COMMUNITIES, third-party defendant Docket: SJC-13580 Dates: October 7, 2024 – Janu

Lenk, J. Prior to 2006, G. L. c. 94C, § 27, provided criminal penalties for the possession, delivery, sale, or exchange of hypodermic needles without a prescription. In 2006, the Legislature amended the statute to regulate only the sale of such needles, thereby decriminalizing, inter alia, the possession of hypodermic needles. See St. 2006, c. 172, §§ 2, 3 (2006 act). <

Gants, C.J. These two cases require this court to navigate the labyrinth of controlling statutes and regulations to determine whether applicants are eligible for long-term care benefits under the Federal Medicaid Act (act) where they created an irrevocable trust and deeded their primary asset — their home — to that trust but retained the right to reside in and enjoy the use of the ho

NOTICE: All slip opinions and orders are subject to formal revision and are superseded by the advance sheets and bound volumes of the Official Reports. If you find a typographical error or other formal error, please notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Judicial Court, John Adams Courthouse, 1 Pemberton Square, Suite 2500, Boston, MA, 02108-1750; (617) 557- 1030; SJCReporter@sjc.state.ma.us SJC-12931 ROBERT GOLDSTEIN1 & others2 vs. SECRETARY OF THE COMMONWEALTH. Suff

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 18a0256p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT AMY JO HICKS (17-5206); LINDA BLACKBURN (17- ┐ 5211); WILLIE OUSLEY, on behalf of the Estate of │ Patricia L. Ousley (17-5212); CHERRIE JUSTICE (17- │ 5213); LEAH ANN J

PIERCE, Circuit Judge: Plaintiffs appeal from a final judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Robert Carter, Judge, entered January 31, 1983, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint seeking declaratory, injunctive and. monetary relief for alleged deprivations of rights, privileges and immunities guaranteed by the fourth and fourteenth amendments of the United States Constitution

737 F.2d 187 SECURITY AND LAW ENFORCEMENT EMPLOYEES, DISTRICT COUNCIL 82,AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE, COUNTY AND MUNICIPALEMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO, by its Treasurer William CLAY, RichardBischert, William Lothrop, Robert Morse, George Frees,Thomas F. Lynch, Richard J. Schrade, David L. Bowser,Charles E. Gordon, Jr., Melvin L. Bullock, Benjamin Whaleyand Squire Simpson, individually and on behalf of all otherssimilarly situated

BUDD, J. **376 Five students who attend public schools in the city of Boston filed a complaint in the Superior Court against the Secretary of Education, the chair and members of the board of secondary and elementary education, and the Commissioner of Education (commissioner), alleging that

Botsford, J. This case concerns the process by which the Massachusetts Gaming Commission (commission) awarded a gaming license in late 2014 to Wynn MA, LLC (Wynn). The plaintiffs — an unsuccessful applicant for the license, the city that would have hosted the unsuccessful applicant, a labor union, and individual citizens — filed two complaints in the Superior Court that alleged nume

SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT BHARATHAN JEEVANANDAM vs. VANIKALA BHARATHAN; DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT DIVISION, thirdparty defendant Docket: SJC-13687 Dates: March 5, 2025 - May 28, 202

SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT ANNE WEISS[1] vs. PRESIDENT AND FELLOWS OF HARVARD COLLEGE (and eleven consolidated cases[2]) Docket: SJC-13688 Dates: February 10, 2025 – October 6, 2025

ACCEPTED 03-15-00409-CV 8019009 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 11/30/2015 4:14:06 PM