Cases

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Petition for rehearing denied.

ILLINOIS OFFICIAL REPORTS Appellate Court Young America’s Foundation v. Doris A. Pistole Revocable Living Trust, 2013 IL App (2d) 121122 Appellate Court YOUNG AMERICA’S FOUNDATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. THE Caption DORIS A. PISTOLE REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST, DAVID CAPPELLO and MARK CAPPELLO as Successor Trustees of the Doris

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ______________________ No. 21-3162 _______________________ BRIAN A. DAVIS; FREDRICKA K. BECKFORD, Appellants v. GEORGE C. WIGEN, Former Warden, Moshannon Valley Correctional Center; THE GEO GROUP, INC.; DONNA ME

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ______________________ No. 21-3162 _______________________ BRIAN A. DAVIS; FREDRICKA K. BECKFORD, Appellants v. GEORGE C. WIGEN, Former Warden, Moshannon Valley Correctional Center; THE GEO GROUP, INC.; DONNA MELL

J-A03043-20 2021 PA Super 230 MARVIN L. SLOMOWITZ, IN HIS IN THE SUPERIOR COURT CAPACITY AS GENERAL PARTNER OF OF PENNSYLVANIA HANOVER ASSOCIATES, A PENNSYLVANIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, AND IN HIS CAPACITY AS A JOINT VENTURER IN CLARMARK ASSOCIATES, THE GENERAL PARTNER OF FIRST VALLEY ASSOCIATES, A PENNSYLVANIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, AND IN HIS CAPACITY AS GENERAL PARTNER OF HERSHEY PLAZA ASSOCIATES, A PENNSYLVANIA LIMITED PARTNERS

KUNSELMAN, J., This court was asked to rule on preliminary objections filed by the defendant to plaintiff’s complaint. For the reasons that follow, we are sustaining the objections in part and overruling the objections in part. BACKGROUND Plaintiff is a minority member in the limited liability company known as Bee Property Management LLC. The defendants, Richard and Lisa Macklin are t

*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _____________ Nos. 15-2811, 15-2826, 15-2844, 15-2925, 19-1398 _____________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. NICODEMO S. SCARFO, SALVATORE PELULLO, WILLIAM MAXWELL, and JOHN MAXWELL, Appellants _______________ On Appeal from the United States District Co

OPINION CAPPY, Justice. In this appeal, we address important issues regarding sexual harassment litigation under the Pennsylvania Human Relations Act (the Act)1 and under the common law tort of the intentional infliction of emotional distress. For the reasons that follow, we affirm the decision of the Superior Court and *1

167 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 458 (1994) 648 A.2d 595 Louis A. MEIER, M.D., Alphonse DiGiovanni, M.D., Robert Driscoll, D.O., Arthur Martella, M.D., Petitioners, v. Cynthia MALESKI, Acting in her Official Capacity as Insurance Commissioner of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, and Joseph Pulcini, Director of the Medical Prof. Liability Catastrophe Loss Fund, Respondents. Commonwealth Court of Pennsylv

388 Pa. Superior Ct. 400 (1989) 565 A.2d 1170 George FIELD and Dawn Field, Appellants. v. PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC COMPANY; Bartlett Nuclear, Incorporated; Allen H. Hilsmeier, and C. Stuart Nelson. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Argued February 1, 1989. Filed September 12, 1989. Reargument Denied November 14, 1989.

379 Pa. Superior Ct. 150 (1988) 549 A.2d 950 Pearlena MOSES, Appellant, v. Daniel T. McWILLIAMS, Esq., Marvin Krane, M.D., and Albert Einstein Medical Center. Pearlena MOSES, Appellant, v. UNDERWRITERS ADJUSTING COMPANY. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Argued September 16, 1987. Filed September 28, 1988.

921 F.Supp. 1355 (1995) TOTAL CONTAINMENT, INC., Plaintiff, v. ENVIRON PRODUCTS, INC. and Michael C. Webb, Defendants. Civ. A. No. 91-7911. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. November 3, 1995. *1356 *1357 *1358 *1