Cases

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.Justice SOTOMAYOR, dissenting from the denial of certiorari: I dissent from the denial of certiorari for the reasons set out in Brown v. United States , 586 U.S. ----, 139 S.Ct. 14, --- L.E.2d ---- (2018) ( Sotomayor, J., diss

USCA11 Case: 24-10001 Document: 47-1 Date Filed: 12/03/2025 Page: 1 of 6 FOR PUBLICATION In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 24-10001 ____________________ CECIL DANTE BUCKNER,

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

NEWMAN, Senior Judge. Buckner was charged with possession of a prohibited weapon — machine gun, an unregistered firearm, and unregistered am*1155munition. After the trial court denied her motion to suppress evidence, Buckner entered a conditional guilty plea (pursuant to Super.Ct.Crim.lt. 11(a)(2)) to all counts. On appeal she challenges only the denial of her supp

CCA 20150323. On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals, it is ordered that said petition is hereby granted on the following issue: WHETHER JUDGES CELTNIEKS AND BURTON, JUDGES ON THE COURT OF MILITARY COMMISSION REVIEW, WERE STATUTORILY AUTHORIZED TO SIT ON THE ARMY COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS, AND EVEN IF THEY WERE STATUTORILY AUTHORIZED TO BE ASSIGNED

CCA 20150323. Appellant’s motion to attach Appendix C is hereby denied. .

NELSON, District Judge. Xavier Elfonsto Buckner was convicted of one count of being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1), and sentenced to ninety-six months in prison. Buckner now appeals his conviction, arguing that the district court 2 erred in admitting certain “other acts” eviden

585 F.Supp. 564 (1984) James C. BUCKNER, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES of America, et al., Respondents. No. 84 C 1694. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, E.D. May 17, 1984. James C. Buckner, pro se. Linda Wawzenski, Asst. U.S. Atty., Chicago, Ill., for respondents. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ASPEN, District Judge: Pla

714 F.2d 112 Bucknerv.U. S. 82-6227, 82-6236 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Second Circuit 11/4/82 S.D.N.Y., 553 F.Supp. 726 AFFIRMED

C. A. ’9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

SUMMARY ORDER Defendant-appellant Charles Buckner pleaded guilty in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York to one count of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). He appeals from his sentence of fifty-one months’ imprisonment, three years of supervised release, a $1000 fine and a $100 mandatory assessment. We assume the parties’ and counsel’s familiarity with th

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Missouri, Southern District denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  Plaintiff-Appellee, v.  No. 06-4399 FRANK GARY BUCKNER, Defendant-Appellant.  Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. Samuel G. Wilson, D

407 F.Supp.2d 777 (2006) UNITED STATES of America v. Frank G. BUCKNER, Defendant. No. 5:05 CR 00006. United States District Court, W.D. Virginia, Harrisonburg Division. January 5, 2006. *778 W. Kent Bowers, W. Kent Bowers Attorey at Law, Harrisonburg, VA, for Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION WILSON, Di

417 F.Supp.2d 240 (2005) UNITED STATES of America v. Charles BUCKNER, Defendant. No. 04 CR. 279(LTS). United States District Court, S.D. New York. September 12, 2005. Nicholas Stoloff Goldin, U.S. Attorney's Office, SDNY, New York City, for Plaintiff. *241 Edward Michael Kratt, New York City, for Defendant.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Nannette F. Buckner appeals the district court’s order accepting in part and rejecting in part the magistrate judge’s recommendation, and granting Defendant’s motion for summary judgment in Buckner’s employment discrimination action. Buckner also appeals the district court’s order denying her motion for reconsideration. We have revie