Cases

Adams, Judge. Richard L. Buckley, Jr., d/b/a Press-A-Dent brought suit against Jeffrey B. Truelove and his mother Peggy M. Truelove (hereinafter collectively referred to as the appellants) seeking to have the transfer *208of certain real property (the “property”) from Jeffrey to his mother declared void under OCGA §§ 18-2-74 and 18-2-75 of the Uniform Fraudulent Trans

276 F.Supp.2d 1271 (2003) Mark BUCKLEY, et al., Plaintiffs, v. DIRECTV, INC., et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A.1:03-CV-484-MHS. United States District Court, N.D. Georgia, Atlanta Division. June 26, 2003. *1272 Paula Jeanette McGill, The McGill Law Firm, Lisa Dionne Wright, Law Office of Lisa D. Wright, Atlanta, GA, for Mark Buckley

[Cite as State v. Buckley, 2024-Ohio-499.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO PREBLE COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, : Appellee, : CASE NO. CA2023-08-008 : OPINION - vs -

CARDAMONE, Circuit Judge. On December 1, 1997 defendant National Health Insurance Company (National) issued an Individual Hospital Surgical Expense Policy to plaintiff Oliver Bishop, III (Bishop III), on which his son, Oliver Bishop, IV (Bishop IV), as a member of his family, was insured. The policy provided coverage for certain medical expenses for Bishop III and the members of h

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 24-2212 ___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee v. Verlynin Buckley

[Cite as Oliver v. Oliver, 2014-Ohio-5230.] COURT OF APPEALS TUSCARAWAS COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT JUDGES: MISTY L. OLIVER : Hon. W,. Scott Gwin, P.J. : Hon. John W. Wise, J. Plaintiff-Appellant :

[Cite as Oliver v. Oliver, 2013-Ohio-4389.] COURT OF APPEALS TUSCARAWAS COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT JUDGES: MISTY OLIVER : Hon. W. Scott Gwin, P.J. : Hon. Sheila G. Farmer, J. Plaintiff-Appellant /Cross-Appellee : H

[Cite as Oliver v. Oliver, 2012-Ohio-3483.] COURT OF APPEALS TUSCARAWAS COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT : JUDGES: MISTY L. OLIVER : W. Scott Gwin, P.J. : John W. Wise, J. Plaintiff-Appellant : Julie A. Edwards, J.

Appellate Case: 24-2070 Document: 54-1 Date Filed: 09/09/2025 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit PUBLISH September 9, 2025

FAIR, J., for the Court: ¶ 1. On August 9, 2008, Amy Buckley, Derrick Rainey, and David Earl Franklin robbed a liquor store at gunpoint in Columbia, Mississippi. All three were indicted by a Marion County grand jury for conspiracy to commit armed robbery under Mississippi Code Annotated section 97-1-1 (Rev.2006), and armed robbery under Mississippi Code Annotated section 97-8-79 (Rev.2006). The first charge

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT LAMAR BROWN, No. 24-4725 D.C. No. Petitioner - Appellee, 2:22-cv-00564- RFB-BNW v. RONALD OLIVER; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF OPINION NEVADA, Respondents - Appellants. Appe

Oliver v. Brown & Morrison, Ltd., 2022 NCBC 16. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION MECKLENBURG COUNTY 21 CVS 6678 PERRY L. OLIVER, Plaintiff, v. BROWN & MORRISON, LTD., a North Carolina Business Corporation, and ORDER AND OPINION ON TIMOTHY J. MARKS, as President and Sole Shareholder of BROWN &

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GETTLEMAN, District Judge. Defendants seek attorneys’ fees as the prevailing parties in this trademark/unfair competition litigation pursuant to Section 35(a) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1117(a) (“ § 35(a)”), and the Illinois Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act, 815 ILCS 505/10a(e) (the “CFA”). The court should exercise its discretion to award such fees, def

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GETTLEMAN, District Judge. On April 15, 1995, the court issued a memorandum opinion and order finding against plaintiff Dorr-Oliver Incorporated (“Dorr-Oliver”) on the issue of whether Dorr-Oliver had a trademark right in the name “clam-shell” for its Dorr-Clone starch washing machine, but finding in Dorr-Oliver’s favor on the issue of trade dress for that machine. The

894 F.Supp. 1190 (1995) DORR-OLIVER INCORPORATED, Plaintiff, v. FLUID-QUIP, INC., Andrew Franko, and Pic Tek, Inc., Defendants. No. 93 C 0842. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. August 17, 1995. *1191 *1192 *1193 William Terry Ri

920 F.2d 940 287 U.S.App.D.C. 146 UNITED STATES of Americav.Oliver L. NORTH, Appellant. No. 89-3118. United States Court of Appeals,District of Columbia Circuit. Nov. 27, 1990.As Amended Nov. 30, 1990. Lawrence E. Walsh, Independent Counsel, was on the petition for rehearing an

MEMORANDUM OPINION VIRGINIA EMERSON HOPKINS, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY Plaintiff Gregory Oliver (“Mr. Oliver”), a former employee of Federal Express Corporation (“FedEx”), initiated this employee benefits case in the Circuit Court of Etowah County, Alabama, on September II, 2013. (Doc. 1-1 at 4).1 On October 22, 2

— Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Herbert Altman, J.), rendered on or about August 14, 2003, unanimously affirmed. Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]; People v Saunders, 52 AD2d 833 [1976]). We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous points which could be raised on this appe

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO AMEND COMPLAINT MARILYN L. HUFF, District Judge. On September 21,2012 Plaintiff A. J. Oliver (“Plaintiff’) filed a motion to amend his complaint against Defendant In-N-Out Burgers (“Defendant”). (Doc. No. 18.) On October 4, 2012 Defendant filed an opposition to the motion. (Doc. No. 20.) On October 15, 2012, Plaintiff submitted his reply to the opposition. (Doc. No. 22)

(2008) Amy Shirley OLIVER, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Anthony Carl Oliver, Sr., deceased, for and on behalf of the survivors of the Estate of Anthony Carl Oliver, Sr., Plaintiff, v. CITY OF ORLANDO, Lori Fiorino, Orlando Police Department Officer; David Burk, Orlando Police Department Officer; Taser International, Inc., Defendants. No. 6:06-cv-1671-Orl-31DAB. United States District Cou