Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Bryan S Kane and Jane A Kane”
USOR Site PRP Group v. A & M Contractors, Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER • Kenneth M. Hoyt, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION Before the Court is USOR’s amended motion for summary judgment and the defendant, the City of Pasadena’s, cross-motion for summary judgment1. The Court notes that it has issued an omnibus memorandum opinion identifying and discussing undisputed facts and as well, the
GUILBEAU v. DURANT H.M.A.public domain
GUILBEAU v. DURANT H.M.A.2023 OK 80Case Number: 119901Decided: 06/20/2023THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA Cite as: 2023 OK 80, __ P.3d __ NOTICE: THIS OPINION HAS NOT BEEN RELEASED FOR PUBLICATION. UNTIL RELEASED, IT IS SUBJECT TO REVISION OR WITHDRAWAL. CRYSTAL GUILBEAU, Plaintiff/Appel
in the Interest of Bryan Baileypublic domain
GUILBEAU v. DURANT H.M.A.public domain
OSCN Found Document:GUILBEAU v. DURANT H.M.A. Previous Case Top Of Index This Point in Index Citationize Next Case Print Only
in the Interest of Bryan Baileypublic domain
In the Interest of Bryan Bailey, Deceased COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2-05-383-CV IN THE INTEREST OF BRYAN BAILEY, DECEASED <
Ronald J. Hopkins, II, Rachel L. Abrams Hopkins, Sarah A. Abrams, and Langhorne Abrams v. Mary C. Sutphinpublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA January 2026 Term FILED May 29, 2026 released at 3:00 p.m. No. 24-331 C. CASEY FORBES, CLERK
Shell Oil Co. v. Lovold Co.public domain
705 N.E.2d 981 (1998) SHELL OIL COMPANY, Appellant (Defendant below), v. The LOVOLD COMPANY, Appellee (Plaintiff below). No. 32S01-9806-CV-341. Supreme Court of Indiana. December 30, 1998. Rehearing Denied April 16, 1999. *982 Karl L. Mulvaney, Nana Quay-Smith, Larry J. Kane, Phil L. Isenbarger, Indianapolis, Ind
Doe v. Southeast Delco School Districtpublic domain
MEMORANDUM McHUGH, United States District Court Judge This case involves the right of children to be free from sexual abuse at the hands of their teachers when attending public school. Children allegedly victimized by their teacher’s sexual touching and the victims’ parents have sued employees of the school district Where the abuse took place as well as the school district itself. The suit alleges that th
Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a (2022 NY Slip Op 05127) Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a 2022 NY Slip Op 05127 Decided on September 1, 2022 Appellate Division, Third Department Published
ACCEPTED 15-25-00013-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 12:26 PM No. 15-25-00013-CV
Commonwealth v. TAP Pharmaceutical Products, Inc.public domain
Justice BAER, concurring. While I agree with the thoughtful analysis set forth in the Opinion Announcing the Judgment of the Court (OAJC) regarding *364the rebate issue in its entirety, I concur in the disposition of a remand and write to articulate my view as to why I believe a remand is appropriate. The OAJC, based upon its reasoning that the Com
Redland Soccer Club, Inc. v. Department of the Armypublic domain
548 Pa. 178 (1997) 696 A.2d 137 REDLAND SOCCER CLUB, INC., Richard V. Spong, Sr., Richard V. Spong, Jr., Geoffrey T. Morrow, Meredith S. Morrow, Robert E. Kane, Herbert D. Myers, David A. Kupp, Patricia K. Dorwart, Larry R. Smart, Crystal Smart, Bretni Brink, Ryan Brink, Joseph Brtalik, Carole G. Brtalik, Joseph J. Brtalik, Brian Brtalik, Wendy Brtalik, Theodore F. Burd, Diane M. Burd, Christopher T. Burd, Dewitt J. Cline, Jr., Ja
Commonwealth v. Tap Pharmaceutical Products, Inc.public domain
Justice BAER, concurring. I concur in the Court’s order vacating the Commonwealth Court’s order and remanding for the reasons set forth in my concurring opinion in Commonwealth v. TAP Pharm. Prods. Inc., — Pa.-, 94 A.8d 350, 2014 WL 2728008 (Pa.2014) (Baer, J. concurring)(indieating my view that a remand is warranted for further consideration of the case in light of the OAJC’s analysis of the rebate
ACCEPTED 15-25-00012-cv FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 3:13 PM No. 15-25-00012-CV
Mayor and City Council of Balt v. Alex Azar, IIpublic domain
ON REHEARING EN BANC PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-1614 MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. ALEX M. AZAR, II, in his official capacity as the Secretary of Health and Human Services; DIANE FOLEY, M.D.,
Hope v. Fair Acres Geriatric Centerpublic domain
MEMORANDUM EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, DISTRICT JUDGE This is the Court’s second time addressing the adequacy of Plaintiff Georgia A. Hope’s claims against Defendant Fair Acres Geriatric Center (“Fair Acres”), a nursing home that provided care to Plaintiff from January to November 2014. The Court previously dismissed Plaintiffs Complaint for failure to state a claim and granted her leave to amend certain aspects
ACCEPTED 03-15-00348-CV 6616789 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER TOM S. LEE, District Judge. Presently pending in this cause for consideration are the motion by plaintiff The Mississippi Forum on Children and Families for preliminary injunction and application for temporary restraining order pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65; the motion of defendant Richard Berry, Executive Director of the Mississippi Department of H
Columbia Casualty Co. v. 3M Co.public domain
OPINION LARKIN, Judge. Appellant challenges the district court’s dismissal of its claims for breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. Because the dismissal was based on the erroneous conclusion that a party may not maintain both a claim for breach of contract and a claim for breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing based on the same conduct, and because appellant st
Planned Parenthood of AR, etc. v. Cindy Gillespiepublic domain
COLLOTON, Circuit Judge. The Arkansas Department of Human Services terminated its Medicaid provider agreements with Planned Parenthood of Arkansas and Eastern Oklahoma after the release of controversial video recordings involving other Planned Parenthood affiliates. Planned Parenthood of Arkansas and Eastern Oklahoma could have challenged the termination through an administrative appeal and judicial review in the Arkansas c