Cases

OPINION Opinion by Justice ROSS. This case involves a dispute over a land sales contract. Bonnie Bryan Mayor, the seller, appeals a jury verdict and final judgment granting specific performance in favor of Vidal Garcia, the buyer. Mayor presents four points of error: (1) whether the property description in the land sales contract was in

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 129 In 1990, Danny Asher, sole owner and president of Asher Investments, Inc., opened "Prime Time," a nightclub in Clifton near the University of Cincinnati. Asher and Asher Investments, Inc. are the plaintiffs-appellants. For convenience, we refer only to Asher throughout this decision. Before opening Prime Time, Ash

In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana ______________________________ No. 06-02-00159-CV

SS Medical Care, P.C., as Assignee of Campbelll Asher, Appellant, against21st Century Insurance Company, Respondent. The Rybak Firm, PLLC (Damin J. Toell and Karina Barska of counsel), for appellant. Law Offices of Buratti, Rothenberg & Burns (Argyria A.N. Kehagias and Bryan Rothenberg of counsel), for respondent. Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City

Matter of Antonio T. (Franklin T.) (2019 NY Slip Op 00888) Matter of Antonio T. (Franklin T.) 2019 NY Slip Op 00888 Decided on February 6, 2019 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Repor

OPINION OF THE COURT GREENBERG, Circuit Judge. I. INTRODUCTION This matter comes on before the court on an appeal by Sandra Register, Grace B. Merchant, Susan L. Wilson, Kristina Beck-man, John J. Daggett, and Richard Rhoades, (“appellants”), from the district court’s order entered on November 21, 2005, granting PNC Financial Service

Matter of Naphtali A. (Winifred A.) (2018 NY Slip Op 06733) Matter of Naphtali A. (Winifred A.) 2018 NY Slip Op 06733 Decided on October 10, 2018 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Rep

222 B.R. 243 (1998) In re MARVEL ENTERTAINMENT GROUP, INC.; The Asher Candy Company; Fleer Corp.; Frank H. Fleer Corp.; Heroes World Distribution, Inc.; Malibu Comics Entertainment, Inc.; Marvel Characters, Inc.; Marvel Direct Marketing, Inc.; and Skybox International, Inc., Debtors. Civ.A. No. 97-638-RRM. United States District Court, D. Delaware. June 25, 1998.

Gary Feinerman, United States District Judge W. James Mac Naughton holds two judgments against Shai Harmelech and his company, USA Satellite & Cable, Inc. In this diversity suit against Shai, Shai's son Etan Harmelech, Shai's wife Judith Harmelech, USA Satellite & Cable, Chicago Title Land Trust Company, JPMorgan Chase, and Citibank, Mac Naughton seeks to collect on the judgments, alleging that the Harmelechs fraudulently c

234 B.R. 21 (1999) In re MARVEL ENTERTAINMENT GROUP, INC.; The Asher Candy Company; Fleer Corp.; Frank H. Fleer Corp.; Heroes World Distribution, Inc.; Malibu Comics Entertainment, Inc.; Marvel Characters, Inc.; Marvel Direct Marketing Inc.; and Skybox International, Inc., Debtors. No. Civ.A. 97-638-RRM. United States District Court, D. Delaware. May 13, 1999.

FLAUM, Circuit Judge. Jeffory Schane, now retired, receives a monthly pension from his union pension plan. The plan’s board of trustees has determined that, based on its interpretation of the pension plan, Schane is entitled to $2,600 per month. Schane reads the plan differently, and believes he should receive $2,900. We are asked to decide whether the trustees’ interpretation o

WIGGINS, Justice (concurring in part, dissenting in part). I agree with the majority’s conclusion that the instruction given was erroneous, *905but depart from the majority’s conclusion that the instructional error does not require a new trial. I conclude a new trial is required for the following reasons.

209 B.R. 832 (1997) In re MARVEL ENTERTAINMENT GROUP, INC., The Asher Candy Company, Fleer Corp., Frank H. Fleer Corp., Heroes World Distribution, Inc., Malibu Comics Entertainment Inc., Marvel Characters Inc., Marvel Direct Marketing Inc., and Skybox International Inc., Debtors. OFFICIAL BONDHOLDERS COMMITTEE, LaSalle National Bank, as Indenture Trustee, Appellants, v. The CHASE MANHATTEN BANK, as Agent, Appellees. In re MARVEL ENTERTAIN

OPINION AND ORDER CHRISTOPHER A. BOYKO, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on Trustee Richard Zellers’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (ECF # 16), and Petitioners’ Motion for Summary Judgment as to the Claims of Richard G. Zellers, Trustee (ECF # 22). For the following reasons, the Court denies the Trustee’s Motion and grants, in part, and denies, in part, Petitioners’ Motion.

*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr

675 F.3d 1047 (2012) FULTON COUNTY EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM, on behalf of a class, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MGIC INVESTMENT CORPORATION, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 11-1080. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued January 12, 2012. Decided April 12, 2012. Geoffrey M. Johnson, Attorney, Scott & Scott, Cleveland Heights, OH

13 F.Supp. 654 (1936) ASHER et al. v. INGELS, Director of Department of Motor Vehicles of California, et al. No. 814. District Court, S. D. California, Central Division. February 8, 1936. *655 Russell D. Garner, of Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiffs. U. S. Webb, Atty. Gen., and Frank Richards, Deputy Atty. Gen., for defenda

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 19a0278p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT DENNIS GALLIVAN, ┐ Plaintiff-Appellant, │ │

626 F.Supp. 667 (1985) PACIFIC FURNITURE MANUFACTURING CO., Plaintiff, v. PREVIEW FURNITURE CORPORATION, Defendant, and PREVIEW FURNITURE CORPORATION and Eli J. Ehrlich, Counterclaim Plaintiffs, v. PACIFIC FURNITURE MANUFACTURING CO., Counterclaim Defendant, and PACIFIC FURNITURE MANUFACTURING CO., Counterclaim Plaintiff, v. PREVIEW FURNITURE CORPORATION, Furniture Marketing Specialists, Inc., and Eli J. Ehrlich, C

Illinois Official Reports Appellate Court Vrakas v. County of Will, Illinois, 2015 IL App (3d) 140424 Appellate Court GEORGE VRAKAS, DAVID J. ADAMS, RONALD ADAMS, Caption ROSE ALBANO, DOREICE ALEXANDER, APRIL ARAMBASICH, ROBERT D. BAIKIE, KAREN M. BAKER, TERENCE A. BERGIN, CHERYL L. BEVERLY, JANETTE E.