Cases

Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS No. 23-CF-0388 DONTE J. CARTER, APPELLANT, V. UNITED STATES,

OPINION MYRON H. THOMPSON, District Judge. Defendant Kimberly Lashun Flowers pled guilty to one count of passing a forged United States Treasury check in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 510(a)(2). Flowers entered her plea pursuant to an agreement with the government according to which the government would recommend a sentence of monitored home confinement rather than imprisonment. At sentencing, the United State

Case 1:17-cv-01783-KBJ-RMM Document 12 Filed 10/09/19 Page 1 of 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) BRIGHTWELL DISPENSERS LIMITED ) ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) ) Civil Action No. 17-01783 (KBJ/RMM) D

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2011 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2010 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit

Case: 21-60626 Document: 532-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/11/2024 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________ FILED December 11, 2

OPINION & ORDER ANDREW J. PECK, United States Magistrate Judge: Francis Wilson, represented by counsel, brings this action pursuant to § 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), challenging the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (the “Commissioner”) denying him Disability Insurance Benefits (“DIB”). (Dkt. No. 2: Compl.) Presently before the Court are the par

ON REHEARING EN BANC PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-4233 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. BILLY CURRY, JR., Defendant – Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond.

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2010 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2010 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit

66 F.Supp.2d 518 (1999) Ruth C. JONES, Plaintiff, v. Kenneth S. APFEL, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. No. 98 CIV. 3389(WHP). United States District Court, S.D. New York. September 20, 1999. *519 *520 Ian F. Feldman, Legal Aid Society, Bronx, NY, for Plaintiff. Susan Baird,