Cases

146 F.Supp. 876 (1956) Weldon Bruce DAYTON, Plaintiff, v. John Foster DULLES, Secretary of State, Defendant. Civ. A. No. 4890-55. United States District Court District of Columbia. December 21, 1956. *877 Harry I. Rand, Washington, D. C., for plaintiff. George Cochran Doub, Asst. Atty. Gen., Oliver Gasch, U. S. Atty., Edwa

PHILLIPS, Chief Judge. These consolidated cases require us to decide which Circuit Court of Appeals should hear petitions filed by numerous parties seeking review of certain regulations promulgated by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). For the reasons stated below, we believe that the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1857 et seq., establishes the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit as the proper court to d

247 F.Supp.2d 913 (2002) J. Bruce BEELER, Plaintiff, v. The WESTERN SOUTHERN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. No. C-3-01-237. United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division. November 7, 2002. *915 Jeffrey Michael Silverstein, Jeffrey M. Silverstein & Associates, Dayton, OH, for plaintiff. George Edward Yun

PER CURIAM. This is an appeal from a judgment of the district court holding invalid certain patents on rearview mirror assemblies and brackets, and dismissing the complaint charging defendant with unfair competition. The district court ruled that the patents in suit were anticipated by the manufacture and sa

128 Mich. App. 165 (1983) 339 N.W.2d 857 LEWIS v. DAYTON-HUDSON CORPORATION Docket No. 64957. Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided August 16, 1983. James R. Pearson, for plaintiff. Smith, Haughey, Rice & Roegge (by Lance R. Mather), for defendant on appeal. Before: DANHOF, C.J., and ALLEN and K.N. HANSEN,<

513 U.S. 265 (1995) ALLIED-BRUCE TERMINIX COS., INC., et al. v. DOBSON et al. No. 93-1001. United States Supreme Court. Argued October 4, 1994. Decided January 18, 1995. CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA *267 *267 Breyer, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in whi

Curt C. Hartman, Judge This matter is before the Court on the Motion to Stay Execution of Judgment Pending Appeal wherein Plaintiff WBCMT 2007-C33 OFFICE 7870, LLC, seeks "to maintain the status quo" by staying execution or enforcement proceedings of the Final Judgment Entry , entered on February 21, 2018, as well as staying the underlying Opinion Concluding Court Lacks Continued Jurisdiction Over Current Pro

CULLEN, Commissioner. Raymond Haggard, proprietor of Mike’s Cafe in the City of Dayton, Kentucky, made application in May 1973 for renewal of the distilled spirits and malt beverage licenses he held for the cafe premises. His application for renewal of his city licenses was approved by the city alcoholic beverage control administrator and on the basis of that approval his state licenses were renewed in accord

KEITH, Circuit Judge. Appellants, The Cincinnati Post, et al., appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 from orders issued by the district court on September 14, 1987, October 5, 1987, and November 20, 1987, which appellants contend denied them their first amendment right of access to the summary jury trial conducted in the underlying action. For the reasons set forth below, we AFFIRM the district court. I.

444 F.Supp.2d 755 (2006) George FERGUSON, Individually, and as Parent of Gabriella FERGUSON, a Minor, Plaintiffs v. AVENTIS PASTEUR INC., et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 05-9-DLB. United States District Court, E.D. Kentucky, at Covington. March 30, 2006. *756 Barbara D. Bonar, Law Offices of B. Dahlenburg Bonar, P.S.C., Holl

102 F.Supp.2d 798 (1998) Florencio REYES, M.D., Plaintiff, v. WILSON MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, et al., Defendants. No. C-3-93-187. United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division. September 21, 1998. *799 *800 Firooz Taghi Namei, McKinney & Namei Co. LPA, Cincinnati, OH, for Florencio R

894 F.Supp. 1190 (1995) DORR-OLIVER INCORPORATED, Plaintiff, v. FLUID-QUIP, INC., Andrew Franko, and Pic Tek, Inc., Defendants. No. 93 C 0842. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. August 17, 1995. *1191 *1192 *1193 William Terry Ri

730 F.Supp.2d 567 (2010) Kimberly LENTZ, in her capacity as interim trustee of the bankruptcy estate of Gary Eugene Hale, v. Claire W. TRINCHARD, esq., et al. Civil Action No. 02-1235. United States District Court, E.D. Louisiana. August 2, 2010. *571 Bruce Arne Cranner, Benjamin Melvin Castoriano, Michael H. Pinkerton, Miles Pau

FLAUM, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff Dorr-Oliver, Inc. (“Dorr-Oliver”) filed suit in district court, claiming that defendants Fluid-Quip, Inc. (“Fluid-Quip”), and its president and majority stockholder, Andrew Franko, copied the trade dress of an industrial machine sold by Dorr-Oliver, in violation of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1051, et seq., and various state la

Per Curiam. In determining whether to award permanent total disability compensation, the commission must consider every allowed condition. State, ex rel. Rouch, v. Eagle Tool & Machine Co. (1986), 26 Ohio St. 3d 197, 26 OBR 289, 498 N.E. 2d 464, validated commission consideration of medical reports which evaluated only one of several conditions, so long as the report acknowledged the existence of

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GETTLEMAN, District Judge. Defendants seek attorneys’ fees as the prevailing parties in this trademark/unfair competition litigation pursuant to Section 35(a) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1117(a) (“ § 35(a)”), and the Illinois Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act, 815 ILCS 505/10a(e) (the “CFA”). The court should exercise its discretion to award such fees, def

747 F.Supp. 1243 (1989) Dwight PURK, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES of America, et al., Defendants. No. C-3-88-516. United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, W.D. April 12, 1989. *1244 Dwight Purk, Piqua, Ohio, pro se. Jan M. Holtzman, Asst. U.S. Atty., Dayton, Ohio, Gerald C. Miller, Tax Div., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.

Alexander, J.** ¶23 (dissenting) —Although I agree with the majority that we should remand to the trial court for “further proceedings,” I disagree with its determination that these proceedings should be conducted consistent with the majority opinion. Majority at 690.1 reach that conclusion because the majority incorrectly determines that an insurer, like Farmers Insurance Company, is not entitled to t

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GETTLEMAN, District Judge. On April 15, 1995, the court issued a memorandum opinion and order finding against plaintiff Dorr-Oliver Incorporated (“Dorr-Oliver”) on the issue of whether Dorr-Oliver had a trademark right in the name “clam-shell” for its Dorr-Clone starch washing machine, but finding in Dorr-Oliver’s favor on the issue of trade dress for that machine. The

WILLIAM E. MILLER, Circuit Judge (concurring in part and dissenting in part). A reversal in this case sets at naught a protracted and complex trial presided over by the District Judge with patience, fairness and ability. Nevertheless, considering the record as a whole and the theories on which the case was presented to the j