Cases

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-02-00117-CV Bruce A. Clark, Appellant v. State of Texas, Appellee FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 345TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. 98-13289, HONORABLE CHARLES F. CAMPBELL, JR., JUDGE PRESIDING \ MEMORANDUM OPINI

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-02-00117-CV Bruce A. Clark, Appellant v.

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-02-00117-CV Bruce A. Clark, Appellant v. State of Texas, Appellee <

Opinion filed October 9, 2008 In The Eleventh Court of Appeals __________ No. 11-08-00192-CV __________ RAYMOND FRANKE AND CECILIA FRANKE, Appellants V. BRUCE A. CLARK & BRUCE C. CLARK, INTERVENOR, Appellees On Appeal

Opinion filed October 9, 2008

CLARK TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-95-00349-CV Bruce A. Clark, Appellant v.

PER CURIAM. AND NOW, this 6th day of February, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED.

MEMORANDUM** G. Daniel Walker appeals pro se the district court’s judgment dismissing his second amended complaint alleging Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”) and civil rights claims against prison officials and state agencies in California and Illinois. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo dismissals for failure to state a claim under the screening provis

737 F.Supp.2d 239 (2010) Raul CLARK, Bruce Clark, and Iraida Clark, Plaintiffs, v. Michael T. CONAHAN, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 3:09-CV-2535. United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania. August 25, 2010. *248 Bridget E. Montgomery, Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott, LLC, David J. Schertz, Harrisburg, PA, Michael

FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit January 28, 2014 PUBLISH Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court UNITED STATES C

BATCHELDER, Circuit Judge. The defendant, Bruce Clark Reliford, was convicted of motor vehicle theft and carjacking in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2119; interference with commerce and robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1951; and two counts of use of a firearm during commission of a crime of violence in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c). Reliford appeals his conviction, arguing that

439 F.Supp.2d 364 (2006) Murray Floyd BRUCE, Plaintiff v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant. No. 3:CR-05-318. United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania. July 13, 2006. Douglas A. Clark, Peckville, PA, for Plaintiff. Daryl Ford Bloom, U.S. Attorney's Office, Harrisburg, PA, for Defendant. MEMORANDUM VANASKIE, Chief Judge.

OPINION OF THE COURT Gonzalez, J. In this action for defamation and breach of contract, we must decide whether letters written by defendant Bruce Clark to two former clients disparaging the professional competence of plaintiff, his former associate attorney who had recently resigned from the firm and taken clients with her, are protected by the absolute defense of truth, or by a qualified or absolute privile

(2008) Khaliq CLARK, Plaintiff, v. A. DANNHEIM, Dennis Hardy, T. Breckon, Donald Selsky, David Matyas, Defendants. No. 02-CV-6525L. United States District Court, W.D. New York. December 2, 2008. DECISION AND ORDER DAVID G. LARIMER, District Judge. Plaintiff, Khaliq Clark, commenced this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff, an inma

ORDER PEGGY A. LEEN, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Before the court is Defendant’s Motion to Compel (Dkt. #57) and request for Qualified Protective Order (Dkt. #60). The court has considered the motions, Plaintiffs Oppositions (Dkt. #75, #76), Defendant’s Reply in Support of Motion to Compel Discovery and Responses and Request for Qualified Protective Order (Dkt. #79, #80), and the arguments of counsel at a

997 A.2d 461 (2010) 297 Conn. 1 STATE of Connecticut v. Michael K. CLARK. No. 18186. Supreme Court of Connecticut. Argued February 22, 2010. Decided June 15, 2010. *464 Bruce R. Lockwood, senior assistant state's attorney, with whom were Margaret Gaffney Radionovas, senior assistant state'

ANN WALSH BRADLEY, J. *54 ¶1 The petitioners, collectively the MacLeish children, 1 seek review of an unpublished court of appeals decision affirming the circuit court's order dismissing their legal malpractice claim against the law fi

60 F.3d 817 Bruce A. Quarlesv.Graig Taylor, Mary A. Clark, Donald T. Vaughn, Joseph D.Lehman, A. Fernandez, Officer NO. 94-2240 United States Court of Appeals,Third Circuit. May 18, 1995 Appeal From: E.D.Pa., No. 94-cv-02776, Ludwig, J.

21st MORTGAGE CORPORATION vs. DeMUSTCHINE, 100 Mass. App. Ct. 792 21st MORTGAGE CORPORATION vs. BRUCE CLARK DeMUSTCHINE. 100 Mass. App. Ct. 792 January 6, 2022 - March 30, 2022 Court Below: Housing Court, Northeast Division Present: Neyman, Ditkoff, & Hand, JJ. Summary Process, Appeal. Practice, Civil, Summary proc

57 P.3d 95 (2002) 2002 OK CIV APP 96 George J. CLARK, Jr., Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Douglas G. CLARK, Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith, Incorporated, a Delaware corporation, Jerry S. Sellars, and Daniel B. Jay, Defendants/Appellees. No. 95,797. Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma, Division No. 1. February 25, 2002. Rehearing Denied